(L'ralntuviX *t* c£ad* LAURISTON CASTLE. I Presented to the LIBRARY of the UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO by A. Huestis THE CASTELLATED AND DOMESTIC ARCHITECTURE OF SCOTLAND Edinburgh : Printed fry George Waterston &° Sons FOR DAVID DOUGLAS LONDON HAMILTON, ADAMS, AND CO. CAMBRIDGE MACMILLAN AND BOWES GLASGOW JAMES MACLEHOSE AND SONS THI<: CASTELLATED AND DOMESTIC ARCHITECTURE OF SCOTLAND FROM THE TWELFTH TO THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY BY DAVID MACGIBBON AND THOMAS ROSS ARCHITECTS rYrf^f?! -VO LU Mff ' iT H Ifi ***** "* • ** - —mm •' % — . * • *• ir EDINBURGH: DAVID DOUGLAS MDCCCLXXXIX All riyhts reserved Nfl 97?- PREFACE. THE reception which the first two volumes of the Castellated and Domestic Architecture of Scotland met with from the public, and the .kind aid which the authors have received from all parts of the country in reply to the appeal contained in the Postscript to the second volume, have encouraged them to proceed with the work they had set before them- selves of making a record of the architectural features and history of all the castellated and domestic structures of any importance erected in the country up to the time when the Scottish style of architecture ceased to exist. They believe that — thanks to the above assistance — they are now in a position to do so, and they entertain the hope that, as the two additional volumes now to be published will complete the subject, they will be not less welcome to all interested in Scottish architecture than the preceding ones. The subject is treated in a manner similar to that of the two first volumes. The third volume contains an account of the structures previously undescribed in the First, Second, and Third Periods, and the portion of the Fourth Period which comprises the Simple Keeps and the Castles of the L Plan. The fourth and last volume will contain the remaining edifices of the Fourth Period, comprising those of the Z Plan, the E Plan, the T Plan, the Courtyard Plan, and modified and exceptional Plans. It will also give illustrations of a large number of houses and mansions from the different PREFACE VI — CASTELLATED AND DOMESTIC towns, numerous altered and fragmentary remains of domestic structures, and a series of Tolbooths or Town Halls, Churches, and Monuments, illustrative of the Scottish style of the Fourth Period. Valuable assistance in many ways, including Plans, Sketches, Photographs, &c., has been received from a great many quarters, and is gratefully acknowledged in the body of the work in connection with the detailed description of the various Castles ; but special thanks are due to the following gentlemen for the interest they have taken in the subject and the important aid they have rendered, viz. : — Colonel ALI/ARDYCE, Aberdeen. A. WHITEFORD ANDERSON, Esq., Warwick Gardens, London. WILLIAM ANDERSON, Esq., Architect, Edinburgh. DAVID ANDREWS, Esq., Girvan. R. BRUCE ARMSTRONG, Esq. A. B. ARMITAGE, Esq., C.A., Edin- burgh. JOHN BAIRD, Esq., Architect, Glas- gow. JOHN BRYCE, Esq., Architect, Edin- burgh. THOMAS M. BROWN, Esq., Closeburn, Dumfriesshire. JOHN WILLIAM BURNS, Esq. of Kil- mahew, Dumbartonshire. ALEXANDER CARMICHAEL, Esq., Bae- burn Place, Edinburgh. T. CRAIG CHRISTIE, Esq. of Bedlay, Lanarkshire. Dr. D. CHRISTISON, Edinburgh. J. T. CLARK, Esq., Advocates' Library, Edinburgh. WILLIAM CRAMOND, Esq., School- master, Cullen. THOMAS DICKSON, Esq., LL.D., Register House, Edinburgh. ROBERT DUNDAS, Esq. of Arniston. H. T. DONALDSON, Esq., Banker, Nairn. JOHN FLEMING, Esq., Scotland Street, Woodlands, Glasgow. WILLIAM FOWLER, Esq., Architect, Edinburgh. WILLIAM GALLOWAY, Esq., Architect. H. WOLRIDGE GORDON, Esq. of Essle- mont, Aberdeenshire. Lord HAMILTON of Dalzell. JAMES HARDY, Esq., Berwickshire Naturalists' Field Club. J. F. HISLOP, Esq., Castlepark, Prestonpans. J. AULDJO JAMIESON, Esq., W.S., Edinburgh. W. C. Jo ASS, Esq. , Architect, Dingwall. Major ARCHIBALD LESLIE of Kinin- vie, Banffshire. Colonel ELLIOT LOCKHART, Branx- holm, Roxburghshire. WALTER F. LYON, Esq., Architect, London. Sir HERBERT E. MAXWELL, Bart., M.P., of Monreith, Wigtonshire. Sir ROBKRT MENZIES, Bart, of Castle Menzies, Perthshire. Kev. ALEXANDER MILLER, Buckie, Banffshire. ARCHITECTURE OK SCOTLAND Vll — PREFACE G. GORDON MILNE, Esq., Architect, T. S. ROBKRTSON, Esq., Architect, London. Dundee. ROBERT MURRAY, Esq., Architect, W. W. ROBERTSON, Esq., Architect, Edinburgh. Edinburgh. Colonel M 'LEO D of Saddell, Argyll- THE COUNCIL of the ROYAL SCOTTISH shire. ACADEMY. HENRY HAY NORIE, Esq., W.S., CHARLES G. SHAW, Esq., Ayr. of Coltbridge Hall, Edinburgh. J. W. SMALL, Esq., Stirling. T. T. OLIPHANT, Esq., St Andrews. J. GUTHRIE SMITH, Esq. of Mugdock J. BALFOUR PAUL, Esq., Advocate, Castle, Stirlingshire. Edinburgh. DAVID THOMSON, Esq., Architect, WILLIAM RAILTON, Esq., Architect, Glasgow. Kilmarnock. Colonel HUNTER WESTON of Hun- J. D. ROBERTON, Esq., Park Terrace terston, Ayrshire. East, Glasgow. JOHN J. WILSON, Esq., Penicuik. The authors desire particularly to acknowledge their obligations to Messrs John Baird, Architect, Glasgow- John Bryce, Architect, Edinburgh — John William Burns of Kilmahew — J. T. Clark, Keeper of the Advocates' Library — Walter F. Lyon, Architect, London — G. Gordon Milne, Architect, London — the Rev. Alexander Miller, Buckie — Robert Murray, Architect, Edinburgh — William Railton, Architect, Kilmarnock — J. D. Roberton, Park Terrace East, Glasgow — and J. Guthrie Smith of Mugdock Castle, Stirlingshire. Information regarding some edifices of the Simple Keep Plan and the L Plan has been obtained too late to permit of their being described in their proper places, but these and any others omitted will be given in a Supplementary Chapter in the fourth volume. Any information regarding structures not yet described, or otherwise, will be most welcome, and will be thankfully acknowledged. o EDINBURGH, November 1889. CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION. PAGE General view of subject — Historical associations — Brochs — Primitive fortresses — Norman keeps — Thirteenth -century castles —Earliest stone and mortar castles in Scotland intro- duced by Normans — Norman churches — Position of country in thirteenth century —The Highlands and Islands, state of — Castles of, similar to those of mainland — Prosperous condition of Scotland before 1286 — Large castles of period — Exhaustion caused by War of Independence — Small keeps of fourteenth century — Contrast of castles and churches of France and England with those of Scotland — Improvement in fifteenth century — Courtyard castles introduced —Perfected in royal palaces — Revival of trade — Haliburton's ledger — Collegiate churches — Scottish style of — Castellated features introduced into — Development of chivalry — Decline of chivalry — Effects of the Reformation — Difference between French and Scottish chateaux — Town houses — Enlarged plans of keeps, L plan, Z plan, E plan, T plan — Modifications to meet requirements — English influence — Churches and monuments in Scottish style — The waggon vault and other domestic details employed, 1-40 FIRST PERIOD— 1200-1300. Castles with a great wall of enceinte — Many preserved in Highlands and Islands — Comparatively few on mainland, . . . 41 Descriptions of the following examples : — Mingarry Castle, . . . Argyllshire, .... 42 Duart Castle, . • . . Do., ... . 46 Kismull Castle, . . Inverness-shire, . 51 Ellan-Tirrim Castle, . . Do., . . .... 56 CONTENTS — X CASTELLATED AND DOMESTIC PAGE Castle Swin, .... Argyllshire, . . . . 58 Skipness Castle, . . . Do., . . . . 63 Achanduin Castle, . . Do., .... 75 Dunvegan Castle, . . Inverness-shire, . . . 77 Ellandonan Castle, . . Ross-shire, .... 82 Duntroon Castle, . . . Argyllshire, .... 85 Dunskaich Castle, . . Inverness-shire, ... 87 Ardchonnel Castle, . . Argyllshire, .... 87 Urquhart Castle, . . . Inverness-shire, ... 90 Loch Doon Castle, . . Ayrshire, .... 96 Achincass (or Auchen) Castle, Dumfriesshire, . . .105 Home Castle, . . . Berwickshire, . . .106 Moulin Castle, . . . Perthshire, .... 109 Bruce's Castle, . . . Ayrshire, . . . .110 Kincardine Castle, . . Kincardineshire, . . . Ill King Edward Castle, . . Aberdeenshire, . . . 112 SECOND PERIOD— 1300-1400. Consists of small keeps — A few of L plan introduced later — Order of description, . . . . . . . . .114 Descriptions of the following examples : — SIMPLE KEEPS : — Borve Castle, . . . Inverness-shire, . . . 115 Breacacha Castle, Coll, . . Argyllshire, . . . . 117 Castle Coeffin, . . . Do., . . . .120 Ardtornish Castle, . . Do., . . . .122 Aros Castle, .... Do., . . . .125 Kildonan Castle, Arran,. . Buteshire, . . . . 125 Moy Castle, Lochbuy, . . Argyllshire, . . . .127 Closeburn Castle, . . . Dumfriesshire, . . . 128 Cassillis Castle, . . . Ayrshire, . . . . 131 Balthayock Castle, . . Perthshire, . . . .132 Drumin Castle, . . . Banffshire, . . . .134 Old Man of Wick, . . Caithness-shire, . . .134 Braal Castle, . . . Do., . . ; . 137 L PLANS : — Cessford Castle, . . . Roxburghshire, . . . 138 Dalhousie Castle, . . . Midlothian, . .144 Ravenscraig Castle, . . Aberdeenshire, . . .149 Portincross Castle, . . Ayrshire, . . . . 151 ARCHITECTURE OF SCOTLAND — XI — FRAGMENTARY REMAINS : — Duchal Castle, Ballumbie Castle, . Tinnies Castle, CONTENTS PAGE Renfrewshire, Forfarshire, . Peeblesshire, 156 158 159 THIRD PERIOD— 1400-1542. Coincides with reigns of Jameses — Courtyard plans introduced — Keeps still continued — Description commences with West Highlands and other districts taken up in succession, . . 161 Descriptions of the following SIMPLE KEEPS : — Castle Stalcaire, Kinlochaline Castle, Castle Mearnaig, . Castle Maoil, Skye, Craignish Castle, . Little Cumbrae Castle, . Fairlie Castle, . . Law Castle, . Skelmorlie Castle, Barr Castle, . Carrick Castle, Kaimes Castle, Giffen Castle, Hunterston Castle, Saddell Castle, Sorn Castle, . Barr Castle, . Mauchliue Castle, . Penkill Castle, Ailsa Craig Castle, Carleton Castle, Lochnaw Castle, . Rusco Castle, Hollows Tower, Bemersyde, . Billicastle, Cockburnspath Tower, . Fast Castle, . Lennox Castle, . , Blackness Castle, . examples : — Argyllshire, . Do., Do., Inverness-shire, Argyllshire, . Buteshire, Ayrshire, Do., Do., Renfrewshire, Argyllshire, . Buteshire, Ayrshire, Do., Argyllshire, . Ayrshire, Do., Do., Do, . . Do, Do., Wigtonshire, Kirkcudbrightshire, Dumfriesshire, Berwickshire, Do, Do, Do, Midlothian, . Linlithgowshire, . 162 168 170 172 173 173 173 173 173 183 186 192 194 194 197 200 201 202 204 206 209 210 213 217 220 220 220 222 224 225 CONTENTS Xll — CASTELLATED AND DOMESTIC Craiglockhart Castle, Kinneil Castle, Mains Castle, Cathcart Castle, Bardowie Castle, . Covington Tower, Lochore Castle, Bruce's Castle, Arnot's Tower, Balrnuto Tower, Pitcruivie Castle, . Gutlirie Castle, Old Slanes Castle, Boddam Castle, Ackergill Tower, . Dirlot Castle, Castle Varrich, L PLANS : — Lethington Castle, Merchiston Castle, Hatton House, Bridge Castle, Lordscairnie Castle, Stanely Castle, Inverquliarity Castle, Brodick Castle, Thomaston Castle, Denmiln Castle, COURTYARD PLANS : — Glengarnock Castle, Craigie Castle, Ardrossan Castle, Ardstinchar Castle, Dunglass Castle, . Mugdock Castle, . Dalzell Castle, Boghall Castle, Innerwick Castle, St Andrews Castle, Balfour Castle, Bucholie Castle, Findlater Castle, . Midlothian, . Linlithgowshire, Lanarkshire, Renfrewshire, Stirlingshire, Lanarkshire, Fifeshire, Stirlingshire, Kinross-shire, Fifeshire, Do., Forfarshire, . Aberdeenshire, Do., Caithness-shire, Do., . Sutherlandshire, Haddingtoiishire, Midlothian, . Do., Linlithgowshire, Fifeshire, Renfrewshire, Forfarshire, . Buteshire, Ayrshire, Fifeshire, Ayrshire, Do., Do., Do., Dumbartonshire, Stirlingshire, Lanarkshire, Do., Haddin gtonshire, Fifeshire, Forfarshire, . Caithness-shire, Banffshire, . I'AGE 227 228 231 233 236 239 241 245 245 247 247 248 249 250 250 253 253 256 263 268 275 278 280 282 285 289 291 293 296 301 302 305 308 312 320 325 328 337 338 340 ARCHITECTURE OF SCOTLAND — Xlll — CONTENTS PAGE SPECIAL PLANS : — Dunure Castle, . . . Ayrshire, . . . .341 Dalquharran Castle, . . Do., . . . .344 Mochrum, The Old Place of, . Wigtonshire, . . . 349 Littledean Castle, . . Roxburghshire, . . .351 Kunraw, .... Haddingtonshire, . . . 353 Newbattle Abbey, . . Midlothian, .... 354 Castle Lachlan, . . . Argyllshire, . . . .357 FOURTH PERIOD— 1542-1700. Reign of Queen Mary unfavourable for building — Border castles ruined — Reformation favourable — Secularised church lands — Connection with England — Traditional plans followed, but modified — Z, T, and E plans introduced — These plans ex- plained— Changes in ground floor, staircases, '. . . Do., '. .396 Edingham Castle, . '. . Kirkcudbrightshire, . . 398 CONTENTS XIV CASTELLATED AND DOMESTIC Bonshaw Tower, , Robgill Tower, Wardhouse Tower, Thirlstane Castle, . Gamelscleuch Castle, Dryhope Castle, . Blackhouse Castle, Kirkhope Tower, . Oakwood Tower, . Goldielands Tower, Barnes Tower, Castlehill, Posso Castle, Wrae Castle, Horsburgh Castle, Nether Horsburgh Castle, Hutcheonfield Tower, . Hyrendeaii Castle, Minto Tower, Timpendean Castle, Corbett Castle, Co wdenkno wes, Corsbie Castle, Cranshaws Castle, . Gamelshiel Castle, Central District — Carberry Tower, . Cramond Tower, . Lamington Tower, Stonebyres, . Castle Gary, . Dumfriesshire, Do., Do., . Selkirkshire, Do., . Do., Do., . Do., . Do., . Roxburghshire, Peeblesshire, Do., . Do, . Do, . Do, Do, . Do, . Midlothian, . Roxburghshire, Do, Do, . Berwickshire, Do, Do., . Haddingtonshire, Midlothian, . Do, Lanarkshire, Do, . Stirlingshire, Crossbasket and Calderwood Castles, Lanarkshire, Kilmahew Castle, . . . Dumbartonshire, Banachra Castle, . . . Do, Darleith Castle, . . . Do, Rossdhu Castle, . . . Do, Kilundine Castle, . . . Argyllshire, . Castle Shuna, . . . Do, East and North Districts — Monimail Castle, . . . Fifeshire, Seafield Tower, . . . Do, Pitteadie Castle, . . . Do, PAGE 398 398 398 402 403 403 404 405 408 413 414 416 417 418 418 418 419 419 420 421 423 425 426 428 430 430 432 436 438 439 442 443 445 447 447 447 447 448 449 450 ARCHITECTURE OP SCOTLAND — XV — Garden Tower, Bandon Tower, Meggernie Castle, . Drumlochy Castle, Garth Castle, Easter Clune Castle, Colquhonny Castle, Invermark Castle, Fairburn Tower, . Castle Craig, L PLANS : — West District — Bedlay House, Monkland House, . Auchenvole House, Jerviston House, . Garrion Tower, Haggs Castle, Greenock Mansion-House, Old Bishopton Castle, . Loch Ranza Castle, Corsehill Castle, . Stair House, Auchinleck Castle, Maybole Castle, Baltersan Castle, . Pinwherry Castle, South - West District — Galdenoch Castle, . Dunskey Castle, . Stranraer Castle, . Carsleuth Castle, . Park House, . Sorbie Castle, Barholm Castle, Earlston Castle, Barscobe House, . South-East District — Gogar House, Inch House, . Bavelaw Castle, Bonhard, :v — CONTENTS PACK Fifeshire . 446 Do., . 446 Perthshire, . . 447 Do., . . . 458 Do., . 458 Aberdeensh i re, 458 Do., . 459 Forfarshire, . . 459 Ross-shire, 462 Do., . 465 Lanarkshire, . 467 Do., . . . 471 Dumbartonshire, . . 474 Lanarkshire, . 474 Do., 476 Renfrewshire, 478 Do., . 484 Do, . . 489 Buteshire, . 490 Ayrshire, 495 Do, . . 495 Do, . 496 Do, . 498 Do, . . . 502 Do, . 504 Wigtonshire, . 506 Do, . 507 Do, . 511 Kirkcudbrightshire, 513 Wigtonshire, . 515 Do, 519 K irkcudbrightshire, . 520 Do, . 521 Do, . 523 Midlothian, . . 525 Do /. 528 Do, . . 531 Linlithgowshire, . . 533 CONTENTS XVI CASTELLATED AND DOMESTIC Herbertshire Castle, Newbyres Tower, . Colinton Castle, Greenknowe Castle, Evelaw Tower, Hillslap Tower, Colmslie, Langshaw, Buckholm Castle, . Frenchland Tower, Drummelzier Castle, Cardrona Tower, . Haystoun. House, . East and North-East District — Rossend Castle, Anstruther Manse, Pitairthie Castle, . Queen Mary's, St Andrews, Fernie Castle, Creich Castle, Cleisli Castle, Pitfirrane Castle, . Blairlogie Castle, . Duchray Castle, Balmanno Castle, . Newton House, Doune, Aberuchill Castle, Comrie Castle, Finlarig Castle, Achallader Castle, Balhousie Castle, . Pitheavlis Castle, . Cluny Castle, Lethendy Tower, . Bannatyne House, Flemington House, Finhaven Castle, . Forter Castle, Ballinshoe Castle, . Kelly Castle, Leith Hall, . Balfluig Castle, . . Westhall Castle, . Stirlingshire, 537 Midlothian, . . 538 Do., . . 540 Berwickshire, . 542 Do., . . 546 Roxburghshire, . 547 Do., . . . 547 Do., . . . 547 Selkirkshire, . 551 Dumfriesshire, . 552 Peeblesshire, . 553 Do., . . . 554 Do., . . 555 Fifeshire, . 559 Do., . 560 Do., . 562 Do, . . . 563 Do., 566 Do., 568 Kinross-shire, . 569 Fifeshire, . 572 Perthshire, . . 577 Stirlingshire, . 577 Perthshire, . . 579 Do., 581 Do, . . 582 Do., 583 Do, 583 Argyllshire, . . 585 Perthshire, . 585 Do, . . 588 Do, 589 Do, . . . 590 Forfarshire, . . 592 Do, , 592 Do, ..' , 594 Do, . . . 596 Do, . 598 Do, . . 599 Aberdeenshire, . 600 Do, . . , 600 Do, . 601 ARCHITECTURE OF SCOTLAND — XV11 CONTENTS PAGE Tilly cairn Castle, . . . Aberdeenshire, . . .601 Esslemont Castle, . . . Do., .... 603 Pittullie Castle. ... Do., .... 605 Fordyce Castle, . . . Banffshire, . . . .606 Findochty Castle, . . . Do., . . . .608 Boharm Castle, . . . Do., . . . .609 Elchies Castle, Easter, . . Morayshire, .... 609 Do., Wester, . . Do., .... 610 Aslisk Castle, . . . Do., . . . .611 Castle Grant, . . . Do., .... 611 North - West and North District — Dundarave Castle, . . Argyllshire, . . . .613 Barcaldine Castle, . . Do., . . . .618 Invergarry Castle, . . Inverness-shire, . . . 620 Redcastle, .... Ross-shire, . . . .623 Castle Leod, . . . Cromarty, . . . .625 Brims Castle, . . . Caithness-shire, . . . 628 Downreay Castle, . . . Do., . . . .630 Ardvreck Castle, . . . Sutherlandshire, . . . 631 Edderchalder or Calda House, Do., . . . .633 THE CASTELLATED AND DOMESTIC ARCHITECTURE OF SCOTLAND ERRATA. Contents, page xv. — Garden Tower, for 446, read 456. ). „ Baiidon Tower, for 446, read 456. » » Meggernie Castle, for 447, read 457. Page 117.— Delete " Iron gate " on illustration. „ 263.— Eighth line from bottom, for "on the north," read "in the north." „ 281.— For "Maxwell of Calderwood," read "the Maxwells of Calderwood." „ 351.— For " Goldenock," read " Galdenoch." „ 356.— For "N.K.L.K," read "M.K.L.N., for Mark Ker, Lord Newbattle." propose, before entering into the detailed description of the various struc- tures not hitherto illustrated, to take a general view of the subject as a whole, endeavouring to draw attention to its important bearing on the social and historical, as well as the artistic aspects and relations of the country. Our old Scottish castles and mansions are so numerous, and form such prominent objects in the landscape, that they never fail to strike even the most careless observer. Their picturesque outlines and mouldering ruins have always been a favourite subject with our artists, and are the constant theme of our foreign visitors and all lovers of the picturesque. Their historical associations with the names most famous in Scottish history add largely to their interest. They recall the great struggle for independence under Wallace and Bruce, the daring exploits of the Douglas, the vigour and chivalry of the Jameses, and their frequent expeditions to the remoter A THE CASTELLATED AND DOMESTIC ARCHITECTURE OF SCOTLAND FROM THE TWELFTH TO THE EIGHTEENTH CENTUEY. INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME III. IN the previous volumes of this work an attempt was made to define the successive stages through which the Castellated and Domestic Archi- tecture of Scotland has passed, and to describe the characteristic features of each period. The various periods were illustrated with numerous examples, which, it was believed, would be considered sufficient to prove the views enunciated. But since those volumes were published we have been enabled — as we then ventured to express a hope that, with the assistance of others interested in the subject, we might be — to ascertain particulars regarding the present and original condition of every structure, so far as we know, of any importance falling within the range of our subject. The information thus collected corroborates generally the conclusions formerly arrived at, and it also comprises some additional materials which bear especially on the earlier castles of Scotland. Being now in a position to trace accurately, and with as much certainty as the nature of the subject allows, the history of the architecture of our castles and houses during the period selected, we propose, before entering into the detailed description of the various struc- tures not hitherto illustrated, to take a general view of the subject as a whole, endeavouring to draw attention to its important bearing on the social and historical, as well as the artistic aspects and relations of the country. Our old Scottish castles and mansions are so numerous, and form such prominent objects in the landscape, that they never fail to strike even the most careless observer. Their picturesque outlines and mouldering ruins have always been a favourite subject with our artists, and are the constant theme of our foreign visitors and all lovers of the picturesque. Their historical associations with the names most famous in Scottish history add largely to their interest. They recall the great struggle for independence under Wallace and Bruce, the daring exploits of the Douglas, the vigour and chivalry of the Jameses, and their frequent expeditions to the remoter A INTRODUCTION — 2 — HISTORICAL ASSOCIATIONS parts of their kingdom ; the happy as .well as the sad experiences of Mary; the disturbances of the period of the Reformation; and the visits of James VI. (often forced and unwelcome, and not always pleasant for himself) to the castles of bis nobility and gentry. Associations such as these, together with the quaintness and originality of the buildings themselves, create in the mind of the observer a certain admiration and respect. But it may be doubted whether the attention of the public has yet been fully awakened to the more important bearings of these ancient structures on the history of our land, and we trust that what we have got to tell about them may have some influence in arousing a deeper and more intelligent interest in the venerable remains of our castles and domestic edifices than they have hitherto excited. We hope to be able to show that they contain a most genuine and un- challengeable record of the gradual development of the country, and of the various stages of civilisation through which the nation has passed. They reveal to us the social relations of the people of Scotland, both in peace and war, during all the periods of our national life. They exhibit the state of comparative prosperity and adversity, of rudeness and refinement, of jealousy and suspicion, or of neighbourly confidence and friendship, in which our forefathers dwelt during all the vicissitudes and trials of the varied epochs of Scottish history. They present to us impressive pictures of the domestic conditions of the various classes of society, and enable us to trace the gradual progress of the inhabitants, from a primitively rude and barbarous condition to one of comfort and refinement. They further convey to us some idea of the position of this country in relation to other lands, and the influences produced by the ties of alliance and friendship, as well as by the experiences of war and invasion — the former leading to the gradual amelioration of manners and the encouragement of the ameni- ties of life ; while the latter, although tending to strengthen the national vigour and love of liberty, having for immediate result the suppression of the country's commerce and prosperity, and the retardation of her progress amongst the nations of Europe for a long period of years. The History of our Ecclesiastical Architecture, while it is most in- teresting in itself, and shows the influence of alliances with foreign countries, does not convey to the mind the same vivid impressions of the condition of the people as that of the castles and houses in which they dwelt. It will, however, be pointed out as we proceed how the Civil and Ecclesiastical styles acted and reacted on one another. It has already been shown* how mediaeval castle building originated in Gaul, and the great impetus given to it by the Normans. Before that vigorous race had developed its full strength in the eleventh century, the fortifications in use, both abroad and in Britain, consisted either of ditches and earthen mounds strengthened with wooden palisades, or of * Vol. i. pp. 2-4. NORMAN KEEPS 6 INTRODUCTION cranoges or artificial islands erected in lakes on piles driven into the ground. Of these early fortifications many fine specimens are to be seen north of the Tweed. Another kind of defensive structure prevailed in Scot- land in pre-historic times, of which a large number of examples exist in various parts of the country. These fortresses consisted of a round tower constructed with a very thick wall of uncemented masonry, so built as to leave an open circular courtyard in the centre of the tower. The wall contained a staircase and small apartments and galleries hollowed out of its thickness and lighted with windows looking into the central courtyard. These forts, or "Brochs," as they are called, have this re- markable peculiarity, that while they are traceable in every part of Scotland, from Berwickshire to Caithness, they are strictly limited to the soil of the country north of the Tweed, no examples having been found to the south of it. Dr. Joseph Anderson regards them as a part -of that wonderful Celtic civilisation which reached such a high point of develop- ment in this country in the centuries before the eleventh. The design and construction of the Brochs are unique, and as places of security they are well adapted for their purpose. Yet they do not seem to have produced any lasting influence on the style of fortress adopted in later times. We have, however, already drawn attention,* and shall again have occasion to advert to some particulars in the fourteenth-century keeps, for which the galleries and pigeon-holes wrought in the walls of the Brochs may well have served as prototypes. The palisaded mounds surrounding the primitive fortresses were of con- siderable size, and contained extensive enclosures or courtyards in which were situated wooden structures consisting of granaries, barracks, &c. In the centre of the courtyard, and surrounded with its ditch, was raised the " motte," or mound, on which stood the wooden redoubt, which constituted the citadel or residence of the commander. But these citadels were liable to destruction by fire; and the Normans, who were great workers in masonry, desiring a more solid and less perishable fortress, substituted a stone and mortar tower for the wooden redoubt. Thus originated the formidable and gloomy structure so well known as the "Norman Keep."f For the wooden palisades were now also substituted solid stone and mortar walls as the enclosure of the courtyard. Such castles were numerous in Normandy by the middle of the eleventh century ; and after the Conquest the whole of England became studded with these symbols of the Norman power and rule. They spread to the very borders of our own land, one being erected at Carlisle on the west, and another at Norham on the Tweed, on the eastern side of the frontier. But it is a remarkable fact that not one Norman keep was ever reared in Scotland which is thus entirely free from those marks of subjection to the Norman invader which are everywhere impressed upon the soil of England. * Vol. i. pp. 62 and 236. t For examples see Vol. i. pp. 5-18. INTRODUCTION — 4 — CASTLES OP 13TH CENTURY The Norman keep (as more fully described in Vol. I.) was almost invariably an oblong tower, of three stories in height. The walls were of great thickness, with only a very few small loopholes for ventilation in the ground floor, which was reserved as a storeroom for provisions and munitions in case of siege.* The first floor was entirely occupied by the great hall, or common living room, where the chief and his retainers and domestics fed, and most of them slept ; while the top story formed the private apartment of the Norman lord and his family. The entrance door to the keep was placed for security on the first floor level, and was approached by a moveable wooden ladder, or by a strongly-fortified outer staircase, contained in a f orebuilding. f The doorway opened directly into the hall, from which a wheel-stair in the thickness of the wall led to the top of the tower. The defences of these keeps were mainly passive, chief reliance being placed on the massive walls, usually twelve to twenty feet in thickness. So substantially constructed were the walls, and so firmly cemented together with hot-run lime, that when in recent years it was desired to form an aperture in the ground floor wall of the Tower of London, it required six weeks' labour, with all the appliances of modern science, to penetrate the solid masonry. The active defence of the keeps was carried on from the parapet which ran round the top of the walls, and was provided with embrasures or crenellations, from which arrows and other missiles could be showered upon the assailants. These Norman castles, when properly provisioned and garrisoned, were able to resist all the means of assault then known. What chiefly strikes us now-a-days in connection with these edifices is the very primitive and rude nature of the domestic accommodation which satisfied the brilliant chivalry of Normandy, amongst whose requirements and attainments that of domestic comfort must certainly have held a very subordinate place. Yet for two centuries after the Conquest such primi- tive and simple keeps continued to be the abodes of the chief nobles of England. Early in the thirteenth century, however, improvements began to be introduced both in France and England. Great advances had been made in Ecclesiastical Architecture, and fresh skill had been acquired in the art of attack and defence of fortresses by the Crusaders, who in this depart- ment had gained much instruction from their contact with the more scientific Moors. The passive strength of the massy keep was now found insufficient to cope with the new military engines employed in sieges. These hurled great stones against the parapets, and threw balls of Greek fire against the roofs, demolishing the former, and setting the latter in flames. It therefore became necessary to keep these formidable engines at as great a distance as possible, and with this view the walls of the courtyard were extended and strengthened. Towers were also erected at * See Castle Headingham and Rochester Castle, Vol. i. pp. 13 and 16. t EARLIEST SCOTTISH CASTLES 0 — INTRODUCTION the angles and along the flanks, from which they boldly projected, in order to enable the defenders to protect with cross fire the " curtains " or spaces of wall between them. The keep, originally the chief feature in the fortress, now became of minor importance, although still retained as a last resort or citadel. The great enclosing wall, or " wall of enceinte," with its towers, now really constituted the castle. Each tower was so constructed and designed as to form an independent post, or little keep, which had to be assailed separately — the principal keep, or lord's resi- dence, being merely the largest and most carefully protected of these redoubts. Great credit is given by Viollet-le-Duc to Richard Cceur de Lion for his skill in designing castles of this form, that of Chateau Gail- lard,* which was built by him in a single year, exhibiting all the newest ideas introduced into the military architecture of the period. These castles, with great walls of enceinte, prevailed in France and England during the thirteenth century; and this is also the type of fortress with which the history of castle building in Scotland commences. It has already been mentioned that no Norman castles are to be found in Scotland. While the latter structures were being reared in England, the ancient wooden fort, upon its "motte," surrounded with an earthen palisaded mound, or a wall composed of mingled stones and earth, seems to have been still adhered to in this country. Such was the Pele of Lumphanan on Deeside, where Macbeth was slain in 1057. But at the period we have now reached (the twelfth century) a great change took place in the style of castle building, as well as in the condition of affairs in the country generally. From the time of the Norman Conquest numerous English refugees had fled to the Scottish Court. Amongst these were the Aetheling and his sister Margaret. The latter, who subsequently became the queen of Malcolm Canmore, was naturally desirous to civilise and improve the rude country of her adoption, and, with this view, was favourable to the influx of Anglo-Saxons, and to their establishment in the land. These refugees were in course of time followed by hosts of Norman adventurers, either attracted by the hope of pushing their fortune under the favour of David I., or driven northwards by the disturbances of the time in England. Such adventurous knights were well received at the Scottish Court, and were frequently gifted with newly-acquired lands. It was doubtless hoped that their culture and skill in arms would prove useful in defending and developing the country, and in civilising the inhabitants ; and it was reasonably to be expected that such wardens would be faithful to the sovereign to whose generosity they owed their appointment. These new lords would, as soon as they found it safe and practicable, try to establish themselves in their possessions by the erection of, castles, which would naturally be designed in accordance with the system of * Vol. i. p. 26. INTRODUCTION — O INFLUENCE OF NORMANS defence and style of castle building to which they had been accustomed in the more advanced regions from which they came. In this way it is probable that building with stone and mortar was first introduced into the construction of castles in Scotland. This also explains how it is that the earliest mediaeval castles in the country are founded on the design at that time prevalent in France and England, in which, as above stated, the castle consists mainly of a great wall of enceinte. The advent of these Southern guests was very opportune at the time we are considering, their skill and enterprise being found valuable in consolidating the outlying and newly-subdued districts. For it must be kept in mind that the kingdom of Scotland in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries was far from being the homogeneous realm we are in the habit of regarding it in later times. Up to the period of David I. the royal authority scarcely extended beyond the Grampians. But the Scottish kings were constantly endeavouring to push forward their borders, and whenever they did so they at once built castles for the defence of the territory acquired, or called upon the knights to whom they entrusted the lands, to erect fortresses for their security. Thus, Moray was annexed by David I., and forthwith a castle was raised at Inverness to secure it. William the Lion extended his rule still further northwards, adding the county of Ross to his dominions, and planting two castles to the north of the Moray Frith for its defence. It is highly probable that these and other early castles before the thirteenth century were of the primeval kind, consisting of palisaded earthen mounds and ditches. But about that time the new style of castle with a great wall of enceinte built with stone and mortar began to be introduced. The general form of this kind of fortress is not very dissimilar to that formerly in use in Scotland, the chief difference being in the substitution of a high wall built with stones and mortar instead of the ancient vallum composed of great masses of rock mixed with turf and earth, and of a keep constructed with masonry instead of timber. The change was thus not so marked here as in England, where the square Norman tower with its courtyard had super- seded the older earthen fortress, and occupied the country for the two centuries which intervened between the date of the latter and the new thirteenth-century castle. The important change in Scotland was the introduction into castles of regular stone and mortar masonry. This, as we have above seen, was most likely brought with them from the South into the land of their adoption by the Norman and English settlers. Hitherto these immigrants had been content to accept the primeval forts they found on the lands assigned to them, or to construct similar ones. But in the thirteenth century a new order of castles arose. This new departure was no doubt encouraged by the example of the ecclesiastics. From the time of St. Margaret the ecclesiastical system of Scotland had undergone a complete change, the early Culdees, or CHURCH BUILDING EPOCH — 7 — INTRODUCTION priests, being gradually superseded by those under the Roman influence. The chapels of the former were probably small cells similar to those still to be found in Ireland, whence the original missionaries of the Scots came, and in some of the western islands of Scotland. But in the twelfth century numerous bodies of monks and priests were brought into Scotland. Alexander, David, and William the Lion distinguished themselves by their zeal for the Church, and by the establishment of monasteries in their newly-acquired domains. These institutions were found valuable not only as centres of religious influence, but were also planted for the purpose of reclaiming the soil, establishing industries, encouraging agri- culture, and generally acting as pioneers to civilise and develop the country. Of the perseverance and success of the many religious colonies which were at that time imported into all parts of the country, we have abundant evidence in the splendid architectural remains of the churches erected within a century of their establishment. David I. (1124-53) is well known as the great promoter of this en- lightened policy. When he began his reign he found only four Episcopal Sees established in the kingdom, all of which he renovated, while he also formed five new ones, thus leaving nine bishoprics behind him. Almost all the great monasteries and churches were founded by him, or at least before the death of William the Lion in 1214. The names of Kelso, Dry- burgh, Jedburgh, Melrose, Dundrennan, Whithorn, New Abbey, in the south ; of Holyrood, Cainbuskenneth, Dunblane, Brechin, Dunfermline, St. Andrews, Arbroath, Glasgow, Paisley, in the central districts ; of Elgin, Pluscardine, Urquhart, and Kinloss in Moray ; of Fearn, Beauly, Tain, Dornoch, Kirkwall, in the north ; together with a host of other less known abbeys and churches, show the extraordinary enthusiasm for church building which prevailed in Scotland, as it did everywhere throughout Christendom, during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. Nearly all the great churches and cathedrals of France and England were also founded at that time. In the latter century the religious impetus continued unabated, many of the first modest structures of the twelfth century being demolished, and larger and more imposing edifices reared in their stead, or great additions made to the earlier buildings. Such was the case in Scotland at Dunfermline, Kirkwall, Kelso, Melrose, Holyrood, Dun- blane, Glasgow, St. Andrews, — in fact, at almost every one of the early establishments. These rebuildings and additions were, of course, executed in the style of the period when they were done, while many edifices founded somewhat later are carried out in the first Pointed style. Such were Arbroath, Stirling, Ardchattan, Crossraguel, Dundee, Inchmahome, Kilwinning, New Abbey, Saddell, Oronsay, &c. The number of churches thus reared throughout Scotland was immense, and so constantly and vigorously were the works pushed on that it was said that "preaching could not be heard for the sound of the hammers and trowels." INTRODUCTION POSITION OP SCOTLAND This was pre-eminently the church building epoch in Scotland, as it was also everywhere throughout Europe. The number of men engaged in the erection of churches must have been very great. It is difficult to conceive how such an army of skilled workmen should have sprung up so suddenly amongst this remote and lately rude and uncivilised people. It may possibly be suggested that they came from England, whence we know so many of the monks were fetched. These certainly brought with them the style of church architecture then practised in the South, and which was thus adopted at a shortly later date in Scotland. But as regards the artisans the same difficulty arises, whether we turn to England or France. The church building mania was, if possible, in a more fully developed condition in those countries than in Scotland, and it is difficult to imagine how they could provide the necessary workmen for their own requirements, not to speak of sparing a multitude for employment else- where. It is a well-known fact that, during the reigns of Alexanders II. and ill., in the middle of the thirteenth century, Scotland held a somewhat prominent position amongst the nations of Europe, and performed her part in the international policy of the time. She contracted alliances with foreign countries ; she contributed her quota of knights and soldiers for the Crusades ; she carried on considerable commerce with France and the Low Countries, and, as above pointed out, she also joined the community of European nations in their artistic endeavours to glorify the Church and exalt the Christian faith by the establishment of monasteries and the erection of cathedrals and churches. The workmen required were doubtless natives trained to the work by the ecclesiastics. There is no reason to suppose that Scotland was not at that period as capable of supplying workmen as she was of maintaining her position in other respects. There can be no doubt that the policy above described of importing strangers, both lay and ecclesiastical, had the effect of producing an entire revolution in the culture and condition of the country. One effect of this introduction of new blood certainly was a burst of prosperity such as had never before been known. Scotland had, in fact, by this revolution been subjected to a real though quiet Norman Conquest— very different, indeed, in its process, but very similar in its results, to that of England. The principal fiefs had all passed into the hands of Norman barons of the highest name and descent, in whose favour feudal charters were granted. The following quotation from Professor Cosmo Innes' Sketches of Early Scottish History (p. 10) shows how thoroughly the land had been Normanised : — " It is astonishing with what rapidity those Southern colonists spread even to the far North. From Tweed and Solway to Sutherland, the whole arable land may be said to have been held by them. The great old Houses of Athol, Lennox, and Strathearn IN 13TH CENTURY - 9 - INTRODUCTION were within the fastnesses? of the Highlands. Angus soon came into the De Umphravils through marriage. But of the race of the English colonists came Bruce, Baliol, Biset, Berkeley, Colville, Cumin, Douglas, Dunbar — descended of Northumbrian princes, long themselves princes in the Merse— Fleming, Eraser, Gordon, Hamilton, Lindsay, Maule, Max- well, Morvil, Moubray, De Quinci, Ruthven, Stewart, Sinclair, Somer- ville, Soulis, Valoines, Wallace, and many other names, not less powerful though less remembered." " Norman knight and Saxon thegn set himself to civilise his new acquired property, settled his vil or his town, built himself a house of fence, distributed the lands of his manor among his own few followers and the nativi whom he found attached to the soil." In a similar manner they founded churches and monasteries, and distributed their church patronage amongst their relatives and followers. The old primeval system of the Culdees was soon swept away, and the new Roman system introduced. Monks and bishops were brought from England and France ; and, indeed, the whole clergy of Scotland were at one time within the jurisdiction of the Archbishop of York. Under this new condition of affairs the country became civilised and con- solidated. The maormors of the North, with their Highland followers, were subdued and held in check by the royal castles and the barons appointed to command them ; while the influences of religion and instruction brought to bear on the people through the monks and emissaries of Rome tended to the cultivation of the land and the improvement and enlightenment of the inhabitants. The art of building with stone and mortar was also thoroughly introduced and established, and the abundant natural resources of the country for that purpose were discovered and developed. The application of the new method of building to civil and military uses, as well as ecclesiastical, would naturally follow. That the church building, of which so many examples still survive, was accompanied with castle building in the same style of masonry, may be well imagined ; but of that fact we are able to adduce some remarkable proofs in the existence of castles which are evidently contemporary with the churches of the same locality, both detached and connected. Together with the new civilisation which, in the above manner, overspread the land, the latest style of castle em- ployed in England and France in the thirteenth century was naturally imported. This, it will be remembered, is the castle consisting of a great wall of enceinte, strengthened with towers, of which the keep forms the largest. Much evidence still survives in every part of the country to show that this was the case, and that these castles are the earliest of which any trace exists. Several examples of this, the " first period " of our Scottish Castellated style, have already been exhibited in Vol. i. (p. 65); and others in different parts of the country, including Dumfriesshire, Berwick- shire, and Ayrshire, besides a number in the Highlands and Islands, are included in the present series. INTRODUCTION — 10 — HIGHLANDS AND ISLANDS While adhering to the general idea of the great wall of enceinte, these Scottish castles vary not a little in their mode of carrying out the plan. Some consist, like Mingarry and Duart, of nothing but a plain wall of enceinte ; others, like Castle Roy and Dunstaffnage, show signs of incipient towers ; while in others, such as Inverlochy and Achencass, the towers are more fully developed; and in the castles of Bothwell, Kildrummie, and Dirleton are displayed, along with the same military features, the richness and grandeur of the style as it was carried out in France and England. Castles of this period are not now, however, very numerous in the populous and pi'ogressive parts of the country, where they have, in many cases, been altered or removed to suit the requirements of later times. But in the more remote and stationary districts of the Highlands and Islands, where changeful influences have not been so strongly felt, the result has been that a large proportional number of our primitive Scottish castles have survived, and remain almost unaltered till the present day. It is with agreeable surprise that the investigator finds his labours rewarded by the discovery of so many examples of the style of the thir- teenth centuiy in the Highlands and Islands of the West Coast ; and it is satisfactory to observe in them a striking corroboration of the views already submitted regarding the first period of our Castellated style. Owing to the comparative scarcity of examples of that period on the mainland, it was with reference to this first division Of the subject that confirmation of the classification adopted in Vol. I. was required; but the examples now adduced will, it is believed, entirely remove all possibility of doubt as to its accuracy. As might be expected, most of the castles in these outlying localities are of a simple form and somewhat rude construction, consisting, as they chiefly do, of a plain wall of enceinte. Unfortunately, they are also almost entirely destitute of any history beyond what can be gathered from the internal evidence of the structures themselves; but considerable light is thrown on the subject by a consideration of the general history of the Highlands and Islands during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. We have already seen how the kingdom was extended northwards in the twelfth century. At that period, however, little progress had been made westwards through the mountain barrier of Argyllshire. That region, together with the Western Islands, as well as the Orkneys and the northern parts of the mainland, were in the hands of the Scandinavian Vikings. These bold and enterprising rovers had, in the ninth century, spread their arms over all those portions of the northern coasts of Scot- land and the adjacent islands to which their formidable galleys could find access. In several encounters on the east coast they had been successfully resisted, but they ultimately succeeded in obtaining complete possession of all the islands as far south as the Isle of Man, and had also established themselves in Caithness, and at various points on the West Coast of Scot- HISTORY OF — 11 — INTRODUCTION land, as well as on the mainland of Ireland. These possessions formed what was called the "Kingdom of the Isles." It was held nominally under the Crown of Norway, but really by almost independent rulers, con- stantly in revolt against Norway and at war with one another. These petty kings were for a time brought into subjection by Magnus Barefoot, who, in 1093, carried out a formidable expedition for that purpose. He re-established the suzerainty of Norway, and entered into an agreement with the King of Scotland, whereby his sway was acknowledged over all the islands between which and the mainland a helm-carrying ship could pass. In this category the cunning Norseman managed to include Kintyre, his right to it being supposed to be established by his causing his galley, himself seated at the helm, to be dragged across the narrow isthmus between East and West Lochs Tarbert, which joins the peninsula to the mainland. Soon after this time, however, the native inhabitants, oppressed by the Norwegian yoke, appear to have shown a strong desire to rise and drive out the strangers. In this movement they were aided by Somerlid, thane of Argyll, a somewhat mythical personage, who, however, embodied the spirit and aspirations of the people. Under him the Southern Islands were recovered from the Norsemen towards the middle of the twelfth century, and by him they were transmitted to his sons, Ronald and Dougal. The former became the ancestor of the Macronalds, Lords of the Isles, and the latter of the Macdougals, Lords of Lorn. Thus, in the middle of the twelfth century, the Kingdom of the Isles was divided into two, the Point of Ardnamurchan marking the division between the northern and southern groups. Argyll then formed the headquarters of the southern portion, or the " Suderies," as it was called. This extensive and wild province of the mainland was not as yet incor- porated with the royal domain, but steps were taken for that purpose early in the thirteenth century, and in 1222 Argyll was brought under the Crown by Alexander n. Negotiations were then entered into between the king and Haco of Norway, but these proving unsuccessful, the reduc- tion of the islands was resolved on. Alexander at once entered vigorously on the task, but he died in the island of Kerrera (opposite Oban) while prosecuting the attack. This led to the great invasion of the islands, and threatened assault upon Scotland, by King Haco, with an overwhelming fleet, which resulted in his well-known overthrow at Largs in the Frith of Clyde, and the cession of all the Western Isles to Scotland, in 1263. By that act the consolidation of the country was accomplished under Alex- ander in., who first ruled over the whole kingdom of Scotland, in the sense in which we now understand the name. But although thus brought under the Scottish Crown, the islanders were for a long time most unruly subjects, and very fluctuating in their allegiance. Thus Bruce was cordially supported by Angus Oig of Islay, but bitterly opposed by the Macdougals INTRODUCTION -12 — CASTLES IN THE of Lorn, while John of Islay (Angus Oig's successor) at first joined Baliol, but subsequently yielded to David n., by whom he was pardoned and allowed to retain a large portion of the islands. In 1346, Amie, the wife of John of the Isles, succeeded, on the death of her brother Ronald Mac- alan, to Uist, Barra, Eig, and Rum ; and John, having by this succession become by far the greatest chief in the Hebrides, assumed the title of Lord of the Isles. He and his successors long maintained a kind of inde- pendence, but during the fifteenth century their power was curbed ; and, notwithstanding many outbreaks and rebellions, the island chiefs were gradually brought under complete subjection to the Jameses, and were found to form an important accession to the strength of the kingdom. After that time the castles erected in the islands were naturally Scottish in character (as the examples of the different periods given in the present series show) ; but it was scarcely to be anticipated that the castles of the isles during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, when they were prac- tically independent, would also closely resemble those of the mainland. The same influences, however, prevailed in those early times among the Hebrides as in Scotland. We have seen how the Scottish kings, as they extended their territories in other regions, planted castles for their defence, and entrusted their safe keeping to some knight in whom they had confidence. It was impossible in those times to garrison such castles in any other way, and the keeper had the same interest as the Crown in protecting his domain against foreign foes. This led to the founding of William's castles at Edindower and Dunskaith, north of the Moray Frith, and to the planting of a chain of castles along the Caledonian Valley, to keep the Highlanders of the north-west in check. Thus Urquhart Castle, on Loch Ness, and Inverlochy Castle, at the western extremity of the valley, were called into existence, while Dunstaffnage seems to have been erected to secure Argyll and form a basis for operations in the Western Isles. These royal castles were entrusted to wardens, Urquhart being in the keeping of the Durwards ; Inverlochy in that of the Comyns, Lords of Badenoch; and Dunstaffnage under the care of Macdougal of Lorn. Two of these keepers, it will be observed from their names, belong to Norman families already established and grown powerful in the North. The Mac- dougals, again, were descendants of Somerlid, but they were in close con- tact with the Comyns and other Normans, and if Dunstaffnage was erected by them, they must have borrowed from their neighbours their style of castle building. The other Highland and Island chiefs would in a similar manner acquire from the barons in their vicinity the art of constructing castles with lofty walls of enceinte. The Church, too, had spread its influence into these regions, and numerous chapels exist throughout Argyll and the Isles which belong in all probability to the Norman and Early English periods (twelfth and thirteenth centuries). These structures, although very numerous, are HIGHLANDS AND ISLANDS - 13 - INTRODUCTION for the most part so simple in form and devoid of ornamental features that their age is not easily determined.* In some cases, however, the date can be fixed either by the style of the architecture or by written evidence. At Dunstaffnage, for instance, the style of the chapel is so distinctly Early English f that there can be no hesitation in assigning its date to about the middle of the thirteenth century. And as the castle is of similar workmanship, and is known to have existed before the time of Bruce, it may safely be inferred that we have here a genuine thirteenth- century structure. At Skipness, too (illustrated in this volume), the chapel of St. Columba, which is distinctly in the style of the thirteenth century, still stands not far from the old castle. Both these buildings have features in common, and both are referred to in a charter of 1261, in which Dufgal, the son of Syfyn, presents the patronage of the chapel close to his castle at Skipness to the monks of Paisley. The style of the architecture and facts in the history of others enable us to assign a considerable number of the castles of the Highlands and Islands to the same period. There is thus every reason to believe that the castles of the first period in those regions were erected shortly after the isles came under the sway of King Alexander in., either as royal castles or by the island chiefs under the royal authority and instructions. They all present the leading feature of the thirteenth- century strongholds of Scotland and England, viz., the great wall of enceinte, with or without towers. They are built with stone and mortar, and most of them have the long narrow windows with pointed arches or loops of a cruciform design characteristic of the period. In some (such as Castle Swin) broad buttresses like those of Norman work are used, and many have the large gateway of the period, covered with a pointed arch provided with a portcullis, and surmounted by a chamber on the top of the wall, which contained the machinery for working the latter, and also served as a post for the defence of the gateway. The conclu- sion to which we are led by all the circumstances above narrated connected with these castles of the Western Highlands and Islands is that they are the result of the general policy of the Crown, which was to raise fortresses of the thirteenth-century type all over the country, and entrust them to the keeping of local barons, for the purpose of maintaining law and order, and with a view to ensure the carrying out of the royal decrees in every part of the dominion. These fortresses might either be constructed by royal mandate, or by the powerful barons and chiefs recog- nised by the Crown, and encouraged to hold their lands under the authority of the king, to whom they thereby acknowledged themselves vassals. That these castles should constitute the first period of our Scottish Castellated Architecture is thus seen to be quite natural. They 'arose at * See Mr. T. Muir's Characteristics of Old Church Architecture in Scotland. t Vol. i. p. 91, INTRODUCTION 14 DR. HILL BURTON'S VIEWS the period when the Norman strangers had introduced a new order of culture, both civil and ecclesiastical, into the country, and are therefore in the style of architecture then practised throughout Europe. It appears at first sight strange that this advanced order of fortress should thus suddenly, without any preliminary or tentative steps, spi'ing up in every part of the country. But we trust that the above considerations make it evident that it could scarcely have been otherwise. The primeval structures in the form of earthen forts and Culdee chapels continued in force till the quiet " Norman. Conquest " of the twelfth century, above referred to, had taken effect. Then, exactly as occurred after the more violent conquest of England in the eleventh century, everything was changed, and a new civilisation introduced along with the feudal system. This, too, was the period when the Roman Church and the civil power spread their influence over the remote parts of the kingdom, including the islands, and planted everywhere the new forms of architecture peculiar to the period both in castles and churches. Dr. Hill Burton, in his careful and generally accurate account of Scottish Architecture,* refers to the above castles in the Western High- lands and Islands only to wonder at them ; and while professing his inability to explain their existence, asks whether they may not have been reared by the princely Scandinavian rulers of the isles. But we have no evidence that the Norsemen, like the Normans, were builders in stone and mortar. Their strength lay on the sea, and they put their trust in the powerful galleys which they so skilfully constructed, and in which they could move from place to place as their desire for fighting and plunder might prompt them. Now, however, when it is seen how naturally these primitive castles of the West fall into their place as part of the earliest period of our National Castellated Architecture, their origin seems to be explained in the simplest, which in such cases is generally the best way, and speculations such as the above become unnecessary. The distinguishing feature of all the Scottish castles of the thirteenth century, or first period, is, as already mentioned, a great wall of enceinte, with or without towers at the angles, crowned with a walk on the top, defended by a crenellated parapet. The space enclosed is frequently more or less quadrangular ; but in several instances the wall follows the outline of the mass of rock or other site on which it stands, thus giving the struc- ture an irregular and multangular form. Examples of both these designs are found equally 011 the mainland and in the islands. Lochindorb in Moray, Inverlochy in Argyll, and Achencass in Dumfriesshire, show the square plan, with towers at the angles. Duart in Mull, Skipness and Castle Swin in Argyll, and Castle Roy in Inverness, were originally simple parallelograms, two of them with one or two square towers. Loch * Hist. Vol. ii. p. 100. CASTLES OP FIRST PERIOD - 15 - INTRODUCTION Doon Castle, Ayrshire, Mingarry and Kismull in the Hebrides, Home Castle in Berwickshire, and Urquhart on Loch Ness, follow the outline of their elevated rocky sites ; while the round form of Rothesay and the triangular plan of Caerlaverock are special shapes, probably arising from some peculiarity of the sites, which were by those arrangements the better adapted. for defence by the wet ditches which surrounded them. Some of these early fortresses, as originally constructed, are of the most primitive and simple design, and presented to view no other elements besides the crenellated enclosing wall : such, for example, is Mingarry on the Sound of Mull. Others were distinguished in outward aspect by the greater elevation of the angle towers above referred to over the curtains, and by lofty pointed gateways, armed with a portcullis and its machicolated chamber above. Thus Inverlochy and Achencass would be relieved by the commanding towers at the angles ; while Skipness, Swin, and Duart presented to the eye nothing but a plain enclosing wall, with an outline broken only by the great gateway, defended by a portcullis, and surmounted by an upper chamber armed with machicolations. Such are the simpler forms of the Scottish castles of the first period ; but (as shown in a previous volume),* the same style of castle is carried out in a much more extensive and splendid scale in such structures as Kildrummie in Aberdeenshire, Dirleton in East Lothian, and Bothwell on the Clyde. An example of fine masonry combined with simplicity of general form occurs in the present volume, in Loch Doon Castle in Ayrshire. In these buildings the materials and workmanship are superior, the walls being constructed with finely wrought ashlar, and the doors, windows, and parapets ornamented with mouldings and carved work. So great is the difference between the style of these castles and that of the ruder erections above referred to, that many have attributed this superior work to the English during their occupation of the country under the Edwards. But this supposition does not appear to be necessary. The more elaborate castles are in the central and civilised parts of the country, where good freestone abounds, and where building in ashlar was familiar through the work of the ecclesiastics ; and there seems to be no reason why families such as the De Moravias should not desire to have as fine work in their castles of Bothwell and Kildrummie as in the numerous churches erected by them. Besides, as previously pointed out, it should not be forgotten that Bothwell rather resembles a French than an English castle of the thirteenth century, while Dirleton was in existence before the time of Edward's invasion, and was destroyed — not restored — by the English. Yet the work at Dirleton is of as highly finished a character as that of any of the castles in Scotland. Attention has already been drawn to the prosperous condition of the country during the reigns of Alexanders n. and in., and the magnificent * Vol. i. p. 93, INTRODUCTION 16 - WAR OF INDEPENDENCE churches and castles which were then erected, whose remains still convey to us some impression of the rapid progress the kingdom had made in the two centuries which had elapsed since Queen Margaret inaugurated the new system of things. But this state of prosperity was brought to a sudden close. In 1286 King Alexander in., in a foolhardy ride in the dark, from Burntisland to his hunting seat at Kinghorn, on the coast of Fife, was thrown from his horse over the rocks, and killed. His grand- daughter, the Maid of Norway, his only heiress, died in Orkney, while on her way to Scotland to ascend the throne. The country, thus deprived of any legitimate head, was immediately plunged into the difficulties and disorders of a disputed succession. The nobles were split up into parties, rule and authority were paralysed, and commerce and business were brought to a standstill. Then followed the arbitration of Edward I., resulting in the appoint- ment of John Baliol as king, and leading to Edward's invasion of Scotland in 1296, and the occupation of the country by his troops. The people of Scotland, long accustomed to freedom and independence, could not endure the loss of liberty and the presence of the stranger in the land ; and, first under Wallace, and subsequently under Bruce, they rose against the invaders, and maintained for eighteen years a fierce though inter- mittent struggle for liberty and independence, which was at length brought to a successful issue at Bannockburn in 1314. But the conflict was long and severe, having lasted practically from Alexander's death in 1286 till 1314. Nor was it yet over; during the greater part of the fourteenth century a constant strife had to be maintained with Edward in., and even Richard II., and it was not till the weak government of the latter, and the foreign wars and internal dissensions of England, gave the Scots a favourable chance, that they succeeded in finally establishing their independence. While this war of a hundred years lasted the country was over and over again devastated and its resources exhausted. Many of the Norman nobles, who held the largest estates, forsook Scotland and left her to be defended by the natives. Thus deprived of her most influential barons, and thinned out and impoverished by war and famine, the condition of the country was reduced to one of great misery. The golden age of Scotland had passed, her commerce was destroyed and her people ruined. Nothing remained to them save their liberty and independence. The effect of this disaster is at once apparent in the castles and houses erected during the above period. Before this time we have seen that Scotland occupied an acknowledged place amongst the European nations, and that she kept pace in Castellated and Church Architecture (in style, if not in dimensions) with other countries. But from the time of the wars of secession and independence her position is completely changed. So utterly exhausted and im- KEEPS OF 14TH CENTURY 17 INTRODUCTION poverished was the country by that protracted struggle that in the fourteenth century none, not even the highest and most powerful, could undertake such extensive works as had been universal in the two preceding centuries. Besides this, the policy of Bruce forbade the construction of large castles, which, it was feared, might fall into the hands of the enemy and give him a secure footing in the land. In these circumstances, although it is at first sight somewhat surprising, on consideration it is not unnatural to find that the nobles fell back on the plan of the ancient Norman keep, which had been abandoned in the land of its birth and adoption for about two hundred years. Many of these keeps were doubtless still in use in England, and their arrangements must have been familiar to those of Norman descent who still held possessions both in England and Scotland, while their strength would be impressed on the Scots by experience during their raids over the Border. But the movement was one of retrogression, and shows how terribly the condition of the country had been thrown back by the fiery trial through which it had passed. Here, then, we have another example of the influence of the " Norman Conquest " upon Scotland. The Norman institutions of Church and State had, as above pointed out, already spread themselves over the country, and now, at the late date of the fourteenth century, the Norman keep is also introduced, and is found as suitable for the nobility of Scotland in their reduced condition as it had been for those of England two centuries before. The close resemblance of the castles of Scotland at this period to the Norman keep is shown, and their arrangements are fully described, in a previous volume.* The Scottish, like the Norman keep, con- sisted of a three-storied tower — having stores in the vaulted basement ; a common hall on the first floor, where all the retainers, guests, and domestics fed and slept promiscuously ; and a second floor, which formed the private apartment of the lord and his family. The walls, like those of the proto- type of the eleventh century, were massive, the entrance door was on the first floor, and the defences were at the parapet of the roof. A small courtyard, containing outhouses, was generally attached to the castle. The hall was often vaulted, and the roof was frequently formed of stone slabs, laid on a pointed arch, so that the whole structure might be rendered completely fireproof. These simple keeps are especially characteristic of the century which succeeded Bannockburn, all the castles then erected being of this descrip- tion. In many instances, particularly in the Western Highlands and Islands, keeps of this sort have been added to the great wall of enceinte of the more ancient castles, such as Duart, Kismull, and Ellan-Tirrim. Even the king's palaces were simple keeps such as above described. At Rothesay the keep was added to the existing circular wall of enceinte ; and the castle of Dundonald, in Ayrshire, in which Robert II. lived, and * VoL i. p. 144. B INTRODUCTION — 18 — ACCOMMODATION IN KEEPS died, although on a larger scale, is on the same plan as the other keeps of the fourteenth century. Dundonald is about 80 feet by 40 feet, while the castles of the nobles generally vary from 40 to 60 feet in length, by 20 to 30 feet in width. The limited accommodation provided by these structures would appear to have well suited the requirements of the country in its reduced condition, both then and for a long time afterwards, as keeps of this kind continued to be erected for the mansions of the smaller proprietors down to the seventeenth century. As already mentioned, the accommodation contained in the castles of the fourteenth century is of the most meagre description — one common hall being the only apartment for retainers, visitors, and servants. Bed- rooms were unknown, and even a kitchen was wanting, the cooking being done at the hall fire or in some shed in the courtyard. In the description of Pitsligo Castle, to be given in the following pages, there is an old account, written in 1723, which mentions that "the top story was the sleeping apartment for the whole family, and had in it twenty-four beds." There is one chamber, however, which is seldom absent, viz., the prison or "pit," an adjunct of some importance at a time when every lord of the manor possessed the power of "pit and gallows," and could imprison and execute as seemed to him right. Every castle, therefore, has its prison or "pit," a small chamber about 8 or 9 feet long by 3 or 4 feet wide, formed in the thickness of the wall, and to which access was obtained only by a stone trap-door in the floor of a guard- room above. In old castles attention is frequently drawn to iron hooks or rings in the vaults, which are said to have been used for sus- pending prisoners from. But that is a popular fallacy. Hangings were generally executed on a large tree near the castle, where the victim might be seen and produce the proper effect on the beholders. The gallows-tree is still pointed out in the vicinity of many of the larger castles. The hooks in the vaults were used for the innocent purpose of hanging up provisions or lamps, while the prisons are carefully-constructed pits such as above described. They had no windows, but are usually ventilated by a small opening in the wall placed at a high level, and sloped upwards diagonally through the masonry. As may be readily conceived, everything in the form of ornament was entirely absent from the fourteenth-century keeps. The corbelling of the parapet was of the simplest kind, and was even frequently absent, the parapet being carried up flush with the face of the wall. A round over- hanging bartizan corbelled out at each angle, together with a few plain gargoyles to carry off the water from the parapet walks, are the only objects which break the plain, grim aspect of the structure. Such were the castles or houses in which the king and the nobility of Scotland dwelt during the fourteenth century, and these simple keeps constitute the second period of our Domestic Architecture. The contrast \ FRENCH AND ENGLISH CASTLES 19 - INTRODUCTION between the cramped dimensions of these rude and mean abodes and the grand and imposing castles of the first period is striking indeed, and conveys a very palpable impression of the miserable and poverty-stricken condition of the country during the fourteenth century. Nor did it fare much better with the Ecclesiastical Architecture of this period, which in the neighbouring kingdom was then at its zenith. While in England there arose such splendid monuments in the Decorated style as the west front of York Minster, the Minster and St. Mary's at Beverley, and the beautiful works at Newark, Carlisle, Ely, Selby, Lich- field, Exeter, Dorchester, Oxford, and a hundred other places throughout England, there scarcely exists in Scotland a single edifice which can claim a place in this the most perfect of Gothic styles. A solitary exception may perhaps be made in favour of Melrose Abbey, which was the favourite shrine of the Bruce, and to the restoration of which he largely contributed. But even here the work of the fourteenth century was subsequently much destroyed, and most of the existing building is of a later date. While the magnificent churches of the Decorated period were in pro- gress in England, the castles of that country and of France were also advancing in stateliness and convenience. The great wall of enceinte of the thirteenth century, with its keep and round towers, was found to be a somewhat dismal abode. Extended and more cheerful accommodation was called for, and was gradually provided by the erection of halls, private rooms, bedrooms, 4._.Dunblane cathedral. Tower. OF CHIVALRY IN SCOTLAND — 29 — INTRODUCTION FIG. 5. — Corstorphine Church. It was in the midst of this feudal life and spirit that we might naturally look for the full development of the mediaeval castle — ttya,t combination of the fortress and the palace — which, as we have seen,* had attained to such perfection in France and England somewhat before this time. And specimens of this pride and dignity of feudalism are not wanting here. The great Castle of Tantallon represents the power of Angus, the head of the younger branch of the Douglases ; Edzell, that of the Lindsays ; the Dean, that of the Boyds ; Crichton Castle, that of the Crichtons ; Dunnottar, that of the Earls Marischal. The state and strength of the feudal Church also is well maintained in such structures as Arbroath and Dunfermline Abbeys, the Bishops' Palaces at Spynie and Kirkwall, and the Castle of the Primate at St. Andrews. These structures reveal to us, and picture vividly to the mind, a state of life and society so different from our own, and so full of the picturesque- ness of mediaeval times, that we are inclined to linger over it and dwell upon its peculiarities, as we would upon those of a foreign country we are visiting. We feel in a new element, and stop to enjoy the novelty and variety of the surroundings. The feudal pomp and state of the king as he moved from one palace to another, surrounded by a brilliant Court and attended by all the dis- tinguished of the kingdom, lay and ecclesiastic, as his ministers and servants, and encouraging by his patronage the poets, artists, and musicians of the day ; the great barons in their several castles repeat- ing on a variety of scales the same display, sometimes equalling, if not exceeding, that of royalty in magnificence; the bishops and abbots, in their fortified palaces and monasteries, vying with the nobles in the splendour of their retinues and the number of their armed followers; and every smaller proprietor endeavouring to maintain in his tower of fence, with a few retainers, an independent state — all completely fortified and in a constant position of watchfulness and armed neutrality or actual warfare ; the innumerable feuds and constant clash of arms ; the frequent movement of bodies of steel-clad troops, or the swift passage of the solitary armed messenger — present a picture as widely different from that of modern times as it is possible to conceive. But shortly after the death of James v., by the middle of the sixteenth century, a change in the conditions and relations of the various elements of society began to manifest itself, the result of which became apparent in * Vol. i. p. 44. INTRODUCTION - 30 - CHANGE OP CONDITIONS the establishment of the Reformation and the introduction of modern ideas and modes of life. The unsettled condition of the country during the minority and reign of Queen Mary, the troubles of the Reformation, and the disputes with England under Henry vin. were very unfavourable for the progress of architecture, and tended rather to the destruction than the development of our buildings, whether civil or ecclesiastical. The ruthless invasions of Hertford and Somerset in 1544 and 1547 were especially severe on the castles, churches, and every kind of property in the south-eastern district. Amidst all the strifes, however, of that agitating period the country generally was progressing, education was advancing, manners were soften- ing, the towns were growing in importance, and the voice of the people was making itself heard, as was particularly apparent in the popular manner in which the Reformation was adopted and maintained. Agricul- ture was improving and business was spreading ; and when the compara- tively quiet reign of James vi. succeeded, a remarkable tide of prosperity displayed itself. Not only were the landed proprietors, who had obtained large accessions to their incomes by the secularisation of the church lands, enabled to build themselves splendid mansions, both on their estates and in the towns, but the merchants and citizens now also found themselves in a position to maintain town mansions and warehouses of some pretensions ; while the humbler members of the merchant guilds could also afford to erect substantial dwellings and shops of masonry, some of which have survived to our own time. The period of the power and supremacy of the feudal barons was now passing away. The king and the commons were gradually gaining the ascendancy, and the importance of the feudal castle and the monastic rule was in the decline. The merchants and craftsmen of the towns were now independent of them. The education and training of the people enabled them to carry on their business without the protection of a feudal superior, and the craftsmen and traders who formerly clustered round the baron's castle or the abbot's gate now prosecuted their affairs under the shelter and privileges of the towns and guilds. The castle and the hall declined and the towns prospered. The barons no longer erected huge walls of enceinte for defence, and great halls for the entertainment of numerous retainers and visitors. Their castles became mansions for the private occupation of themselves and their families, and were constructed of suitable size and arrangements for that purpose. But the country was not yet free from feuds, and many bloody scenes disgraced the reign of James vi. "Wars of religion and private quarrels still created some disturbance, and it was necessary that every man's house should still be his " castle," in the sense of being strong enough to resist such sudden onslaughts as might yet be expected. Hence there AND STYLE AT REFORMATION - 31 — INTRODUCTION arose in the country those numerous structures generally dignified with the name of "castles," which are in fact only the private mansions of the nobles and landed proprietors, but retain so many of the defensive features of the days of feudal power and chivalry as give them that picturesque and unique character for which our Scottish " chateaux " of the beginning of the seventeenth century are so remarkable. In France and England a similar period had been passed through, but it had occurred at an earlier time. Although, therefore, a corresponding mixture of domestic and military elements may be observed in the mansions of these countries, yet, as the transition did not take place at the same date as in Scotland, it is somewhat different in style and character. In the former countries the passage from the warlike castle to the peaceful mansion took place while the style was still Gothic, and gave rise to the beautiful chateaux of the time of Louis xi. and xn. and Francis i. in France, and of the Tudors in England. By the time of James vi. the mansions in those countries were almost entirely free from warlike features, and the well-known dwellings of the Elizabethan period were about as complete in domestic arrangements and innocent of defensive elements as the country houses of the present day. But in Scotland the change was later in coming, and we thus find that the corbellings and turrets of the Castellated style continued to be employed along with the Renaissance elements which at the same time were gradu- ally growing up here. The result is a blending of Scotch Castellated and Renaissance features quite different in style from the mixture of defensive elements with the late Gothic details, which is found in other parts of Europe. This forms one of the great charms of the Scottish style, and gives it that unique and distinctive character which renders it so striking and attractive. This, too, constitutes a positive refutation of the theory which assumes that the Scottish architecture of this period is all borrowed from France — on which enough has already been said in a previous volume.* In the Elizabethan Architecture of England, and in the domestic work of the Continent in the sixteenth century, a considerable amount of timber construction was employed, and everywhere picturesque examples are to be met with of the overhanging and trussed and framed structures thus produced. In Scotland, too, a great deal of this sort of work was em- ployed, particularly in the towns, where the traditional wooden construc- tion of the houses rendered its adoption easy and natural. A few of these interesting relics of our municipal edifices still survive, and drawings of many remarkable examples now gone are preserved in the fine work of the late James Drummond, R.S.A., on Old Edinburgh. In the following volume are given some of the few specimens of our town houses still remaining, and attention is directed to these as examples of the corbelled and projected fronts which (as elsewhere pointed out f) we * Vol. ii. pp. 12-14. t Vol. ii. p. 10. INTRODUCTION — 32 - HOUSES IN TOWNS believe to be the original motive or idea on which the large amount of stone corbelling, so distinctive of our Scottish buildings of the fourth period, is founded. In the introduction to the fourth period* it has been shown how the various circumstances of the time combined to produce the characteristics of our latest style. The gradual encroachments of the Renaissance modi- fied, as above mentioned, the aspect of the transition from fortified to peaceful design. The invention and use of artillery rendering the mediaeval fortress untenable, served, along with the social changes we have alluded to, to hasten the fall of the " castle," and the substitution of the " mansion " instead. The Reformation supplied funds to the landowners (from the secularised church properties) with which to build and decorate their houses ; and the union of the Scottish with the English Crown brought about closer relations between the countries, and led to the improvement of manners and the assimilation of the conditions of life in the North to those of the more advanced and cultivated South. All these changes in the social condition of the country could not fail to produce a strong effect on the buildings of the period. We have already seen how the domestic elements were superseding the military, and the idea of comfort and ease was overcoming that of strength and security. This is distinctly observ- able in the plans of the mansions. The "courtyard plan," which was rudely begun in the third period, and was only carried out with anything like regularity in the royal palaces of Linlithgow and Stirling, was now adopted in many of the mansions throughout the country. At first it was applied in a somewhat crude and tentative manner (as at Tolquhan, Dunnottar, Stobhall, &c.) ; but in later examples, such as Heriot's Hospital, Argyll's Lodging, Stirling, Caroline Park, and Drumlanrig, the quadrangle is designed with the buildings arranged around it in perfect order and strict symmetry. In the larger mansions, too, like Drumlanrig, the accommodation provided is very abundant, so much so that the latter still serves as the residence of one of the principal nobles of Scotland. The old " hall," with its numerous and miscellaneous occupants, was now converted into the modern dining-room, and the other apartments also assumed a modern guise. Drawing-rooms, galleries, libraries, boudoirs, parlours, and private suites of apartments were distributed round the courtyard, and all the arrangements of modern life gradually superseded the older forms. Of these changes the plans of Holy rood Palace (to be given in the following pages), and of Dunnottar, Drumlanrig, and Caroline Park,f give good illustrations. Seton Palace, near Tranent, was probably the most sumptuous example of the Domestic style of the fourth period, both as regards its arrangements and design. It has unfortunately been completely swept away ; but from what remains of the beautiful work, * Vol. n. p. 1. t Vol. i. p. 562 ; n. 446, 453. PLANS OP THE 4rTH PERIOD 33 INTRODUCTION both internal and external, at Winton House,* built by the same family and about the same time, we may form a fair idea of the magnificence of its greater contemporary. The above remarks on the improvement in accommodation and disuse of defensive features apply of course to mansion houses, which henceforth occupy a different position and are entirely separate from the castles. The latter, such as Edinburgh, Stirling, Dunbar, Tantallon, and Dumbar- ton, were now regarded as national fortresses, to be held and maintained by the Crown for the defence of the country. Private mansions were no longer considered " castles " in the old sense, although still built sufficiently strong to resist a sudden raid ; but they generally still retained the name simply as a title of courtesy. The numerous mansions erected in the fourth period present us, how- ever, with other plans besides that of the quadrangle. As in the third period, the traditional plans of the previous period are still retained, many houses being erected both on the simple keep and on the L plan. But these generally present certain slight modifications, which serve to show that the work is late in date. The simple keep — such, for example, as Amisfieldf — although quite a plain oblong on plan, is carried up with so remarkable a variety of corbelled turrets, ornamental dormers, and pointed gables and chimneys, that the original simplicity of the plan is lost sight of. The L plan also has the plain outline occasionally broken, as at Craigievar, J with a number of small projections on which turrets are corbelled out, while the parapet and upper story are surmounted with that picturesque variety of turret and gable which render the style so attractive and so unique and unmistakable. But with all these ornamental details a certain number of defensive elements are still preserved, as necessary amidst the jealousies and petty feuds of the period. Thus, the angle turrets, which at that time had come to be used as small closets or dressing-rooms, enter- ing off the rooms, were provided with shot-holes in the floor, and might be made available by lifting a small trap-door. Very frequently shot-holes are also pierced under the window-sills, and the vaulted basement is sup- plied with similar apertures, one or more being always placed so as to command the entrance door. Firearms being now in common use, these shot-holes are generally small apertures, just sufficient to allow the muzzle of a gun to pass through. . The introduction of firearms had the further effect of producing a new form of plan in many of the Scottish mansions of the sixteenth century. This was a novel modification of the keep. Instead of having one square wing, like that of the L plan, placed at one of the angles of the oblong block, the new plan has a round or square tower placed at two of the diagonally opposite angles, thus producing a zigzag figure, which we have designated the " Z plan." * Vol. n. p. 520. t Vol. ii. p. 20. J Vol. n. p. 106. C INTRODUCTION 34 THE Z, E, AND T PLANS This design well meets the various requirements of the period by enabling each face of the main-block to be defended with shot-holes in the angle towers, and also by providing a considerable amount of addi- tional accommodation in the second wing or tower. A large number of country houses were erected on this plan, some of them, such as Terpersie,* being quite small, but furnished with a great many little chambers in the two wings ; others, such as Castle Fraser,f of considerable size, but with similar arrangements on a much larger scale. It is worthy of note that as the " mansion " took the place of the house of fence, the Z plan gradually gave place to the L and other more peaceful and convenient arrangements of the apartments. These various modifications of the keep plan continued to be erected till far on in the seventeenth century. In some are found only the simplest elements of the original keep — the plain three-storied square tower ; others have a kitchen and a few bedrooms in the single wing of the L plan, or a larger number of chambers in the two wings of the Z plan. It is thus seen that, although a few proprietors remain satis- fied in the seventeeth century with the primitive accommodation of the time of Bruce, still a great advance in manners and mode of living has evidently been made on the whole. This is specially noticeable in the efforts made, and the expedients adopted in most of the smaller mansions, to supply the number of private rooms now universally demanded. These efforts naturally produced further variations of the traditional plans, so that in the seventeenth century we find not only simple keeps and L and Z plans, but other modifications of the keep which require two additional letters of the alphabet to distinguish them, and which we accordingly designate the E and T plans. The first consists, as before, of the main oblong building, with two wings or towers attached to it, but, instead of being placed at the diagonally opposite corners as in the Z plan, they are both projected from one side. The object of this arrangement probably was to produce a symmetrical design, a desire for symmetry being now a marked feature in the architecture of the period, and considered of more importance than the superior power for defence of the Z plan. Of this arrangement Pitreavie and MagdalensJ are good examples, and others will be found in the following volumes. It will be observed that in Cowan's Hospital, Stirling, the resemblance of the plan to the letter E is completed by the projection of the central tower containing the entrance doorway. The T plan has also the old oblong block for its main body, but it is lengthened so as to form two apartments, and a tower is placed on one side (generally about the middle), which contains the entrance doorway and a staircase arranged so as to provide a separate access to * Vol. n. p. 205. f Vol. ii. p. 229, £ Vol. n. pp. 543, 546, MODERN REQUIREMENTS — 35 - INTRODUCTION each of the two rooms on every floor. This is evidently a step in the direction of the open dwelling-house, as compared with the defensible tower.* Other modifications of the traditional plans will be noticed as we proceed ; but in course of time these, too, were gradually departed from, and double blocks, having central passages with rooms on each side, which were necessarily lighted from windows on one side only, as in modern houses, were adopted. As the circumstances and causes which had given rise to the keep plan and its various modifications changed and ceased to operate, so the expedients required to meet the defensive requirements of the different periods gradually disappeared, and only the arrangements available for modern open intercourse survived. Thus the Z plan was soon abandoned, while the L plan, the T plan, and the courtyard plan have continued in use till modern times. Improvements in the interior arrangements and designs were soon introduced. Almost all the houses designed on the above plans were now provided with a wide wheel staircase leading up to the first or hall floor, and sometimes rising as high as the second floor, of which the finest example occurs at Fyvie (Vol. II. p. 351). Numerous turret stairs were likewise introduced to give private access to the separate bedrooms, so as to avoid having to pass through one room in order to reach another. In the earlier houses of this, as of the previous periods, the principal apartments are invariably placed upon the first floor, the ground floor being vaulted and utilised as cellars and stores. Encroachments were now gradually made upon this arrangement, and the domain of the cellars was invaded, first by the kitchen and its offices, and finally, in consequence of the demand for increased accommodation, by the living rooms of the house. Thus we find at Argyll's Lodging in Stirling,! Magdalens House, and elsewhere, the hall and other apartments are placed upon the ground floor, and the cellars are greatly curtailed in extent. This formed another step towards modern arrangements. Before the basement floor came to be thus interfered with, it was almost an invariable practice to set apart one of the cellars as a wine and spirit store ; and in order to enable the proprietors of the house to maintain complete control over this cellar, a small stair was always constructed in the thickness of one of the walls, leading to it from the hall. Supplies could thus be brought from the cellar to the hall under the master's eye without the necessity of opening the principal cellar door or of admitting any one without proper authority. These wine cellars with their small private stairs communicating with the hall are visible in almost every plan, whatever the size of the castle or mansion, * See Gardyne, Megginch, Cardarroch, in Vol. n., and numerous examples in the succeeding pages. t Vol. n. pp. 417, 545. INTRODUCTION 36 — ENGLISH INFLUENCE till towards the close of the fourth period, when the cellars were done away with and the space occupied by them was devoted to family apartments. The cellars and store-rooms were no longer required for victualling the castle or mansion, as the days when it might be called on to stand a siege were now over. The " keep " mansions of all the above varieties of plan were carried to a great height as a simple method of supplying additional rooms. The turrets were frequently enlarged so as to form small apartments, while in some instances, such as Earl Patrick's palace at Kirkwall, they are so designed that they may be almost regarded as angle bow windows. Indeed, had the Renaissance and the English influence not supervened, it seems from the above and similar designs of the period that Scottish architecture would have worked into a characteristic domestic style in which most of its picturesque features would have been preserved, while its rude and warlike elements would have been gradually dropped. Even as events -turned out a considerable step was made in this direction, and in mansions such as Argyll's Lodging, Stirling ; Kelly Castle, Fifeshire ; Auchans, Ayrshire; Fountainhall, Midlothian, and many others, we see indications of what the style might have come to, when simplified and domesticated.* The growing taste and softening of manners are further marked by the improvement in the comfort and adornment of the interiors. At Huntly Castle we have bow windows after the English pattern, a new feature in Scotland. At Earl's Hall, Crathes, and Pinkie, long galleries with decorated ceilings, also imitated from the English mansion, are intro- duced, and in almost all, as the seventeenth century advanced, the walls are finished with wooden panellings, relieved with pilasters and other Renaissance decorations, and the ceilings are ornamented with plaster panelling and ornaments, f There can be no hesitation in ascribing much of this interior decora- tion to the English influence after the Union of the Crowns, while a certain proportion is also due to the constant intercourse and commercial relations with the Netherlands. To the latter we are certainly indebted for the quaint paintings in ceilings and panels, which were now becoming common (see Glamis Castle, Kellie Castle, &c.), and it is well known that Jameson, the "father of Scottish painters," studied in Antwerp under Rubens in the beginning of the seventeenth century. * For further details in connection with this subject see the introduction to the fourth period, in the following volume. t See Moray House, Vol. n. pp. 533, 534 ; Carnock Castle, Vol. n. p. 495 ; Wintoun House, Vol. n. pp. 522, 524 ; Rowallan House, Vol. n. pp. 379, 380. SCOTTISH STYLE IN CHURCHES — 37 — INTRODUCTION CHURCHES AND MONUMENTS IN THE SCOTTISH STYLE. Although it would be entirely beyond the scope of this work to attempt to include a general account of the Ecclesiastical and Monu- mental Art of Scotland in our description of the Castellated and Domestic Architecture of the country, still there exist some examples of churches and monuments containing such striking illustrations of the Scottish style that the exposition of the subject would be incomplete without some notice of them. These serve to show how native to the soil the Scottish style was, and how naturally it adapted itself to every kind of structure in the land. It has already been observed that in the earliest period of our style, where any signs of ornament exist in the castles, as, for instance, at Bothwell, Kildrummie, Dirleton, &c., the details correspond with those of the Gothic architecture of the churches, as indeed was universally the case at that time all over Christendom. During the second period we saw that the barons and laity generally were too much impoverished to think much of orna- ment; but where it does occur, the same tendency to imitate ecclesias- tical details continues, as, for example, in fireplaces, aumbries, &c. In the third period (fifteenth century), when the style of ornament became more distinctly Scottish in character, we find that the process began to be reversed, and that many features of our civil style are gradually intro- duced into the ecclesiastical edifices, where they mingle with the Gothic forms (ante, p. 27). This process is further continued as we progress, until, in the fourth period, the application of the details of domestic architecture to ecclesiastical buildings becomes common, and Gothic features gradually disappear from our churches and monuments. These finally assume the style of architecture of the houses and castles of the period, and become entirely Scottish in design. Thus, in the gateways of Arbroath* and Dunfermline Abbey, may be seen the intermingling of castellated with ecclesiastical elements at an early period; and it has been indicated above how the corbels, turrets, crow-steps, and other cas- tellated features gradually found their way into the ecclesiastical edifices. It is in the later churches, however, that the adoption of domestic elements becomes general, nearly every church of the fifteenth and six- teenth centuries being distinguished by its crow-stepped gables and cor- belled and embattled parapets, precisely in the style of the castles and mansions. The towers, like those of Dunblane and Dunfermline, already referred to (ante, p. 28), are further made to resemble castles by the addi- tion of corbelled and embrasured parapets with bartizans at the angles. The south porch of Linlithgow Church, with its corbelled oriel and crow- stepped gable, has a still more domestic aspect (Fig. 6) ; while the central tower of Melrose shows a curious though elegant mixture of features, * Vol. i. p. 561. INTRODUCTION 38 CASTELLATED FEATURES FIG. 0.— Linlithgow Church. Porch. IN CHURCHES — 39 — INTUODUCTION derived partly from the Ecclesiastical and partly from the Domestic styles (Fig. 7). Some of the examples to be subsequently adduced, such as the west front and tower of the Greyfriars at Stirling, the towers of Pittenweem and Anstruther in Fifeshire, Fenwick in Ayrshire, and others in different parts of the country, show the spirit of the Scottish style in the free use of corbelling, zigzag stringcourses, turrets, &c. In the case of Dysart Church (infra) the tower has the complete appearance of a fortified keep. At Torphichen, again, a story for a resi- dence is built above the church, and gives it a strong resemblance to a place of strength. In still later churches, erected after the revival of Episcopacy in the seventeenth century, the employment of the Domestic Pio. 7. — Melrose. Tower. style is very pronounced. Thus at Dairsie (infra) the corbelling of the belfry, and the classic balustrade with which it is crowned, remind one of the similar features at Crathes and Craigievar. As already stated, a very prominent constructional form is adopted in the roofing of our late churches, which no doubt they owed to the example of the castles, viz., the barrel vaults covered with roofs of overlapping flagstones, with which they are almost invariably finished. The barrel vault, as we shall have abundant evidence, is universally employed in the vaulting of the ground floor of the castles, while the upper floors are also frequently covered with similar vaults, and the roofs are very often composed of overlapping flagstones resting on barrel vaults, either round or pointed. We shall also see that similar features are intro- duced in the churches. / The gradual adoption of the Renaissance during the first quarter of the seventeenth century in the domestic architecture of the country INTRODUCTION - 40 — MONUMENTS produced a marked influence on that of the churches also, and, as it at first chiefly affected the internal finishings of the former, so in the case of the latter it is especially observable in the fittings of the pulpits, galleries, and similar internal departments.* At this period the erection of sepulchral monuments in the Renaissance style took a remarkable development throughout Europe, — a fashion which found its votaries in Scotland also; indeed, so popular did this method of following the ancient heathen fashion of seeking after immortality on earth become, that every one who could afford it endeavoured to rear a monument to himself, on which, surrounded with classic pomp and presided over by heathen gods and goddesses, a record of virtues (whether his own or not) should be handed down to posterity. Every churchyard in the country bears testi- mony to this outburst of Renaissance feeling, that of the Greyfriars at Edinburgh being a typical example. The more wealthy and ambitious further added " aisles " or wings to the churches, in which to exhibit and preserve their more splendid monuments. These " aisles " were naturally in the same style as the monuments, and both together thus helped to impress the Renaissance upon ecclesiastical edifices. The same style soon became general both in domestic and church architecture ; and we find fountains, arbours, and similar structures attached to the mansions for their adornment, which are almost identical with the sepulchral monu- ments in the churchyards. Of the former we have already given specimens in the fine fountains at Pinkie House f and Dundas Castle ; J and many interesting examples of this style of design, including a large number of sun-dials, will be described in a later part of this work. The monuments have already received illustration in that of M'Lellan at Kirkcudbright j§ and some fine specimens from Largs, Ballantrae, Crail, and elsewhere will be given in the sequel. * See Pitsligo, Fen wick, &c., infra. J Vol. I. p. 333. t Vol. n. p. 397. § Vol. ii. p. 155. THE CASTELLATED AND DOMESTIC ARCHITECTURE OF SCOTLAND. FIRST PERIOD. DURING the century before the war of independence a considerable number of castles seem to have existed in Scotland. But from the facility with which these were generally taken and destroyed by King Edward, they probably consisted chiefly of fortifications composed of earthen mounds and wooden palisades, such as Edward himself caused to be erected round Berwick, after he took the town. Many stone and mortar fortresses were, however, in existence at the date of the English invasion. Some of them, as fully explained above, were composed of the simplest elements of the style, and consisted of a great enclosing wall, with a fortified parapet ; while others were provided with towers at the angles, and a few were carried out with the fine workmanship, and provided with the numerous halls and other apartments within the courtyard, which were then usual in France and England. In Vol. I. a number of illustrations of castles in different parts of the country exhibiting all those phases of the thirteenth-century fortress were described. But, as above mentioned, it is chiefly in the Highlands and Islands that examples are now to be found. In the more populous and changeable portions of the kingdom many of the earliest castles have doubtless been altered or removed to make room for those of later times, but in the remoter Highlands and Islands the primitive structures have remained longer undisturbed. This distribution of the castles of the first period recalls to mind what happened to a still earlier form of fortress which preceded them. It has been shown by Dr. Joseph Anderson, in his interesting works on Celtic Art and Architecture, that the Brochs of Scotland, although now rare in the more southern and cultivated districts, are still very abundant in the remoter and less altered northern counties; and he expresses the belief that they were at one time common over the whole land, but have been to a great extent destroyed by the operations of the agriculturist. / The case of the thirteenth-century castles is exactly parallel. Amidst the various struggles for existence, both with the sword and with the FIRST PERIOD — 42 MINGARRY CASTLE plough, which have taken place in the more active parts of the country, the structures most suited to the wants of the times have been preserved, and the older disused forms have been obliterated ; while in the distant and less changing Highlands and Islands castles, like other things, have longer retained their original shape. We shall now proceed to give some account of these ancient strengths of the Highlands and Islands, as well as the few remaining examples on the mainland not already described. Of these primitive fortresses there are two which occupy important positions at each end of the Sound of Mull, viz., Mingarry Castle, on the Ardnamurchan coast, at the north-west end of the Sound, near the entrance to Loch Sunart ; and Duart, at the north-east point of Mull, where it commands the entrance to the Sound from the east. MINGARRY CASTLE. There is no record of the erection of this castle, but from various indications in the structure itself it may be concluded that its original construction dates from the thirteenth century. In later times it was well known, having been twice occupied by James iv. (in 1493 and 1495) when engaged in controlling the isles and receiving the submission of the chiefs. The castle was for long occupied by the M'lans, a sept of the Macdonalds, descended from "the good John of Isla," Lord of the Isles, and Margaret Stewart, daughter of Robert II. The castle was several times besieged, and in 1 644 it was taken by Colkitto, and by him used as a prison for a number of Covenanters. The situation is very conspicuous, and the castle is well seen from the Sound and from Tobermory, which is about six miles distant. Occupy- ing, with its irregular outline, the whole of the top of an isolated rock from 20 to 30 feet high, close to the shore, this fortress guards the entrance from the open sea, both to the Sound of Mull and to Loch Sunart, while it is so placed as to command a view down the greater part of the Sound. The Point of Ardnamurchan, which is only a short distance off to the westward, formed the division between the Norderies and the Suderies. Mingarry thus possessed the gateway to the southern division of the islands. In form the structure is an irregular hexagon (Fig. 8), the rocky site of which rises abruptly from the sea on four of its sides, and is detached from the mainland on the remaining two sides by a deep ditch cut out of the rock. The walls enclose a space about 65 feet from north to south, and 53 feet from east to west. Those on the three sides next the sea are about 6 feet in thickness, and 25 feet in height above the level of the courtyard, while those on the three sides next the land are raised con- siderably higher, probably both for defensive purposes, and also to MINGARRY CASTLE — 43 — FIRST PERIOD conceal the roof of the hall and other buildings, which it seems likely were erected in that position. The principal entrance was naturally in the south wall, towards the sea, so as to give convenient access to and from the ships, which formed the principal means of communication amongst the islands. The doorway stands at a considerable height above the water, and is approached by rough steps cut in the rock. The entrance, which is only 2 feet 10 inches wide, PIG. 8.— Mingarry Castle. Plan. was defended by an iron gate, which still exists ; and the inner wooden door was strengthened with a strong oaken sliding bar, for which the slot in the wall still remains, and there is a recess in the ingoing which might contain arrows or other weapons for the use of the sentinel. "Within the enceinte the principal residence was no doubt constructed on the north or landward side, where the wall was sufficiently high to allow of a building several stories in height, and where several very early FIRST PERIOD — 44 — MINGARRY CASTLE MINGARRY CASTLE - 45 - FIRST PERIOD pointed loopholes or windows are visible on the exterior of the wall. The original structure would therefore occupy very much the same position as the present one (shown by hatched lines). The latter, however, is probably an erection of last century. It is three stories in height, and had a scale staircase and large modern windows and fireplaces. The hatched walls at the sides also indicate offices and outhouses, appar- ently of the same date. The width of these places, which otherwise would have been very narrow, especially on the east side, has been increased by hollowing out the lower part of the ancient thick walls to the depth of 2 or 3 feet (see Plan) — the upper part of the wall above the excavation being sustained by strong wooden beams. The two small wall- chambers or garde-robes in the east and west walls seem to be the only original recesses in the walls. The erections on the west side have been two stories high, and contained apartments on the upper floor and cellars beneath. The offices on the east side seem to have been stables or byres. In the north-west angle of the courtyard, an outside stair (the solid under-building of which still remains) led up to the battlements, having a landing for access to the parapet walk on the lower walls, and being then continued to the higher level of the north wall, as shown. Beneath this staircase was the postern or landward door, with its long narrow ingoing. This would originally communicate with the mainland by means of a wooden bridge across the fosse, although in more recent times it has been supplanted by a stone bridge. The walls of this castle have a very ancient appearance, and the idea of antiquity is strengthened by the form of the loopholes or windows above referred to, which are evidently original, though now built up internally. These, as seen in view of the north side (Fig. 9), are all narrow openings with pointed arches and plain splays, similar in style to those at Dunstaffnage and Duart. The walls at the parapet have all the appearance at first sight of having been armed with wooden hoardings — owing to the number of square apertures like those formed for the reception of short wooden beams for their support. But a closer examina- tion leads to the conclusion that these apertures have simply been gutters (without projecting gargoyles) to carry off the water from the parapet walk. Those over the postern seem, however, to be exceptional, and probably carried a breteche, to which the larger openings in the parapet at this point gave access, for the defence of the doorway below. The remains of the crenellations of the parapet are still observable, as well as long loops in the merlons on the west side. The upright loops under the level of the parapet walk on the north side were probably intended to allow of shooting downwards from the parapet into the ditch below. It will be observed that the angles of the enceinte, even where these are very obtuse, are all rounded, and three of them are FIRST PERIOD — 46 — DUART CASTLE crowned with angle turrets. The latter are not supported in the usual manner on continuous courses of corbelling, but rest on single boldly projected corbels, which would leave the space between them open and available for defensive purposes. We have here undoubtedly one of the primitive castles of the Western Islands. The general plan of the enceinte — the small doorways — the narrow windows with their pointed arches, similar to those at Duart and Dunstaffnage, all indicate a date as old as the thirteenth century. The parapet seems also to be of the same date, and the angle turrets have a very simple and original appearance. It is possible, however, that the parapet may have been reconstructed and the turrets added in the fourteenth century. They have been further altered in later times to suit firearms. DUART CASTLE, ARGYLLSHIRE. This massive ruin occupies a very prominent position at the north- east angle of the island of Mull, and commands the entrance to the Fia. 10.— Duart Castle. View from North-East. Sound from the east. It was for long the stronghold of the principal branch of the Macleans, but the history of its erection is unknown, \ \ DUART CASTLE — 47 — FIRST PERIOD The earliest notice of the castle is in 1390. Its most prominent feature from a distance is the great oblong keep, 63 feet long by 46 feet wide (Fig. 10), with high and massive walls varying from 10 to 15 feet in thick- ness, which towers above the lofty and precipitous site. On the north and west sides the walls of the keep are close to the edge of the rock, there being just room enough left at the north side to permit of a passage to the entrance doorway, which is placed there. On the east of the keep is the courtyard (Fig. 11), enclosed on the south and east sides with a great wall of enceinte, from 6 to 10 feet thick, and still about 30 feet high. Beyond this the castle was further protected by a deep ditch cujb in the rock, of which traces still remain. */• :, '•*//. FIG. 11. -Duart Castle. Plan. What the age of this building may be it would be difficult to determine but for the analogy of others of the same description. Castles of some kind no doubt occupied important strategic points such as this in the Western Islands from a very early date. Of the existing structure the primitive portion undoubtedly consisted of the great wall of enceinte enclosing a courtyard, 80 feet by 65 feet. This fortress would thus cor- respond in design with other rude castles of the first period, such as Mingarry, Castle Roy, and Kinclaven. The keep of Duart is of a different style from the wall of enceinte, and is clearly an addition of the second period, its construction being exactly similar to that of the other large keeps of the period on the FIRST PERIOD — 48 — DUART CASTLE mainland, such as Dundonald in Ayrshire, and Drum in Deeside. The keep has in this case, as in many others in the West, been added to "the primitive wall of enceinte. The entrance gateway to the courtyard (Fig. 12) is in the centre of the south wall. The original opening was 6 feet wide, surmounted with a plain pointed arch splayed on the angle. This has been reduced at a late time by partly building up the opening, when also a porch or gate-house was added. Surrounding the interior of the courtyard on the east and north sides are the remains of a mansion, apparently of the seventeenth century. Returning to the keep, the original doorway, which has a round arched head, was on the first floor, at some height above the level of the rock outside. The sill has, however, been cut down to suit the new levels Fro. 12.— Duart Castle. View from South-East. of the floors, which have evidently been altered when the later additions were made in the courtyard. The keep seems originally to have had a basement story, but apparently the floor has been lowered (at the same time that the door sill was cut down, as above mentioned), and the base- ment may then have been filled up. This could now only be ascertained by excavation. The windows on the existing ground floor have the deep round- arched recesses with stone seats and small openings for light usual in the fourteenth-century keeps. The floor of these window recesses is con- siderably above the existing level of the keep floor, showing that the latter has been lowered, as already noticed. The eastern wall is of the great thickness of 15 feet. This probably arises from the east wall of the keep having been built against the older west wall of enceinte, DUART CASTLE — 49 FIRST PERIOD which has been preserved and heightened along with the east wall of the keep. This view is supported by the fact that there are chambers in the upper or raised portion of this wall (not now accessible, however), while there do not appear to have been any on the lower floors. The walls at the north-west angle are further strengthened with a great buttress, which is carried up about one half the height of the building (Fig. 10). The access to the upper floors and the parapet is by a single narrow wheel -stair in the east wall, the door to which was (like that of the keep) strengthened with a stout sliding bar. The upper floors were of wood, the corbels which supported the beams being still visible in the walls. The top of the walls, which formed the original parapet walk, is now a broad platform, well defended from the weather by a coating of cement. There are indications of a corbelled bartizan having existed at the north-west angle, and the other angles were probably all provided with similar defences, having a crenellated parapet between them, similar to that, for instance, of Doune Castle. The alterations above referred to in the keep, and the extensions in the courtyard, seem to have been executed in the seventeenth century. The lat- ter consist, on the north side, of a two- story building 48 feet long and 14 feet wide internally. The entrance doorway is in the centre, and is surmounted with a shield (Fig. 13), which no doubt con- tained the arms of the M 'Leans, but the carving is now too far decayed to be intelligible. The floors here have been entirely of wood, and there has been no vaulting. A straight stone staircase cut out of the west end of this building leads from the principal courtyard to the small open court opposite the entrance to the keep. The passage has been defended with a door. In this small courtyard there have evidently been some latrines with shoots at the north-west angle. The northern wall of the north addition, although not of the same great thickness as those on the east and south, is apparently very old, from the small loopholes, with pointed arches similar to those at Dunstaffnage and Mingarry, which occur in it. It P Fio. 13.— Duart Castle. Doorway. FIRST PERIOD 50 — DUART CASTLE was not necessary that this wall should be so thick as the others, the castle being unassailable on the north side, owing to the precipitous rock immediately beneath it. Access to the upper floor was obtained by the circular staircase jutting out to the north, which also contains a window with a pointed arch. The building on the east side of the courtyard is probably of older date than that on the north, but it possesses almost no distinctive features to fix its age. The basement contains four vaulted cellars, two of them being each provided with a small window. The doors and windows next the courtyard are round arched. The entrance to the northmost cellar has been built before the addition of the north wing, thus showing that the east wing is, the older of the two. Above these cellars there has seemingly been a great hall with four large windows looking to the east, of which the ingoings are still visible. These have been cut through the original thick wall of enceinte. The entrance to this hall has probably been by some kind of outer stair in the open space at the south end. At the north end the north wall is curved out to a point to prevent any passage round the rock at the foot of the walls. A blunt edge is thus formed like the outer face of a buttress, which is surmounted by a large round turret with entrance from the hall on the first floor. The north gable is further made of great thickness and contains wall-chambers. The walls of enceinte all round have evidently been defended with a crenellated parapet. Some oval shot-holes have been inserted in the south-east angle at a late date. From the above description it will be evident that Duart has certainly been one of the most extensive and powerful of the castles of the West, and it belonged to a family who held a prominent place in the annals of the Isles. The founder of the House of Duart was Lauchlan M'Lean, surnamed Lubanach, who married, in 1366, Margaret, daughter of the first Lord of the Isles. The ancient walls of enceinte no doubt formed the castle previous to that time, and it is not improbable that the keep was erected by Lubanach, with whose date its style exactly corresponds. The family continued to flourish, and obtained extensive possessions both in the Isles and on the mainland, and M'Lean, in addition to Duart, became heritable keeper of a number of castles. In the " Account of the Clan M'Lean by a Seneachie," it is stated that " Hector M6r was the founder of that noble addition to Duart Castle called the Great Tower. He lived altogether more like a noble of our own day than a feudal baron." This was in the middle of the sixteenth century. It seems more likely that the alterations on the keep above referred to were carried out by Hector M6r, and he may also have built the earlier part of the additions. Hence his name has come by tradition to be connected with the "Great Tower." The latter, however, bears all the marks of a second-period keep, while the KI8MULL CASTLE - 51 - FIRST PERIOD later erections are in the style of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries throughout Scotland. In the sixteenth century the royal authority began to be practically felt in the islands, but insurrections and feuds continued to be endless. When James vi. found himself backed with the power of England he took stronger steps to ensure order. In 1608 Lord Ochiltree was de- spatched with a naval force to receive the submission of the chiefs. The castle of Duart was delivered up to him by Hector M'Lean, to whose keeping, however, it was again entrusted on his promise to surrender it when required. The Privy Council now held the chiefs well in hand. They were required to keep order in their domains, and were held responsible for any outrages. They had to appear annually before the Privy Council, and also to exhibit a certain number of their kinsmen. Duart had to produce four, which was a large number, and marked his importance. The chiefs were prohibited from maintaining in their households more than a certain proportion of gentlemen according to their rank. Duart was allowed eight such retainers, being the largest number sanctioned. They were also required to reside at certain fixed places, and, where necessary, to build " civil and comelie " houses or repair those damaged, and to occupy themselves with farming. Each chief was restricted to one birling or galley of sixteen or eighteen oars ; and the quantity of wine allowed in each household was strictly limited — Duart's allowance being four tuns per annum, the largest sanctioned to any chief.* From these regulations and other incidents it is evident that Hector M'Lean of Duart at that time occupied a foremost place in the islands, and it seems very probable that the enlargement of the castle by the buildings on the north was carried out under him and his son Lachlan, who in 1631 attended Court and was created a Nova Scotia Baronet. He died at Duart in 1669. The lintel of the doorway of the north range bears initials which seem to be S. L. M., for Sir Lachlan M'Lean, and the date 1633. The style of architecture accords with that of the period on the mainland. KISMULL CASTLE,! ISLAND OF BARRA, OUTER HEBRIDES, INVERNESS-SHIRE. This very interesting castle was the ancient stronghold of the Mac- neills of Barra. It stands on an islet in Castlebay, on the south coast of the island of Barra, in the Outer Hebrides. The structure is of * See Gregory's History of the Highlands. t The Plan of this castle is completed from measurements made by Mr. Donald M'Lean, schoolmaster, Castlebay, who has also kindly furnished particulars from which the description is partly written. FIRST PERIOD — 52 — KISMULL CASTLE the same primitive type as the castles in the Sound of Mull and on the mainland, and shows that the same influences which produced the latter were also in operation in the remoter islands. In the fourteenth century Barra, along with other domains, was restored by David n. to Ronald, son of Roderick M'Alan, who had followed Baliol, but who, along with John of the Isles, was pardoned by the king in 1344, with a view to securing the aid of the islanders in his intended wars with England. In 1427 Roderick Macmurchan Macneill obtained a charter of the island of Barra from the Lord of the Isles, and it continued thereafter in that family. They were followers of M'Lean of Duart, while the Macneills FIG. 14.— Kismull Castle. Plan. of Gigha, a different branch of the same clan, adhered to Macdonald of Isla. The latter Macneill was in 1472 keeper of Castle Swin under the Lord of the Isles. As above mentioned the castle of Kismull is of the type of the first period, and consisted originally of an enclosing wall of an irregular outline (Fig. 14) following the shape of the rocky site, so that at full tide the whole of the island outside the walls was covered with water. At a later period a keep tower has been added at the south-east angle of the enclosure, in the same way as a similar structure was added at Duart and many of the ancient fortresses of the first period. KISMULL CASTLE — 53 — FIRST PERIOD FIRST PERIOD - 54 - KISMULL CASTLE The castle is of considerable size, measuring about 100 feet in diameter. The principal entrance to the courtyard was on the south-east side, where a door is still visible (Fig. 15), though built up, surmounted by a machico- lated defence at the parapet. Like the doors to Mingarry and Ellan- Tirrim, this one is very narrow. Opposite the south wall a narrow creek in the rock, defended by a wall from the waves, is considered to have been the harbour or dock for the chief's galley. Externally the walls present an appearance very similar to those of Mingarry and Duart, being solidly built with rubble stones and mortar. The angles have a sharp arris at the base, but the northern angle (at N on Plan) is rounded as it ascends, and becomes a turret containing a small platform or sentinel's stance on top. Below this is what is called "the dungeon," there having probably been two apartments in the height of the tower formed by rounding the angle, — the lower one of which may have been a prison, while the upper one was a guard-room. The stones" which covered the platform or roof of the latter still partly exist. A ruined stair leads to the upper chamber and the sentinel's stance. There are two windows or loops for defence in the upper chamber. The walls of the enceinte are four feet in thickness on the north and west, and 7 feet thick on the east side, which is nearest the land, and about 50 feet in height. A. parapet walk goes round the top, and the parapet, which is 18 inches in thickness, has been crenellated. A number of holes are visible all round the outside at the level of the parapet walk. These, like the similar apertures at Mingarry, are evidently gutters or gargoyles to run the water off the walk. The wall on the north-west (Fig. 16) presents two rounded projections, which seem to have been embryo towers somewhat like those of Dunstaff- nage, introduced as points of vantage from which the curtains might be defended. Within the enceinte, a number of buildings have been erected at later dates for residential purposes. These have extended all round the walls, but they are now almost completely ruined. The portion at the western angle is best preserved. It shows a building two stories in height, with square doors and windows and crow-stepped gables. This range has apparently been divided into a number of apartments on the ground floor, each having a separate door from the courtyard. The width of the range is 18 to 19 feet. Each floor has a fireplace in the south-west gable, and these are the only fireplaces visible in the whole structure. There was also an attic floor, as is apparent from a door through the upper part of the central gable. In the open space between the gable of above building and the south-west wall is one of the two wells which supplied the castle with fresh water ; the other was in the centre of the courtyard, but is now filled up, and is no longer visible. That at the south-west angle is enclosed with a wall and partly covered with large stones. It is still 10 feet deep, although to some extent filled up with KISMULL CASTLE — 55 — FIKST PERIOD rubbish, and contains fresh water. This is certainly a somewhat remark- able circumstance, and the existence of this spring was doubtless one of the inducements which led to the adoption of the island as the site for the castle. The keep occupies the south-east angle of the enceinte. It measures 29 feet by 27 feet 8 inches, and is carried up from a broadly- splayed or battered base. The entrance door is in the north side, towards the interior of the courtyard, and is placed on the level of the first floor, so that it could only be entered by means of a ladder, or possibly by a moveable bridge from the parapet walk. There are remains of two stone stairs which led up to this door from the courtyard, but these are doubtless FIG. 16.- -Kismull Castle. View from North- West. additions of a much later date. From the first or entrance floor, a stair, 3 feet 3 inches wide, runs up in the thickness of the wall to the second floor, whence it is continued to the third or top floor. A similar stair descends in the thickness of the wall to the basement, but it is now choked with rubbish. The walls are 6 feet in thickness, and have been pierced with two loops on the ground floor. On the first floor there are two recesses, 7 feet high, with small windows, and larger arched openings at the stair landings. Very few and small window openings are now visible externally. The basement probably, as usual, contained the stores. The hall would occupy the first floor, and above this would be the chief's private apartment, which has windows in three sides. I FIRST PERIOD — 56 — ELLAN-TIRRIM CASTLE The gutter-holes, which were formed at the level of the original parapet, with their drip-stones, are still observable, but the parapet has been raised at a subsequent date so as to provide an additional story. In the upper story there occurs, on the north side of the keep, a projecting bartizan immediately over the entrance door, with a machicolation for its defence. A similar bartizan (as already noticed) is placed at the parapet of the wall of enceinte adjoining the north-east angle of the keep, for the protection of the entrance which existed in the rounded angle of the wall at this point. The doorway would also in this position be masked and protected by the keep. It is observable that the angles of the enceinte have been raised higher than the curtains, but they do not form projecting bartizans. CASTLE OF ELLAN-TIRRIM, INVERNESS-SHIRE. This ruinous and picturesque pile occupies the whole of the irregular platform on the top of an isolated rock nearly surrounded by the waters PIQ. 17.— Ellan-Tirrim Castle. Plan. of Loch Moidart, at the mouth of the River Shin. It was one of the castles on the estates of the Lady Amie M'Ruari, the first wife of John of the ELLAN-TIRRIM CASTLE — 57 — FIRST PERIOD 58 — CASTLE SWIN Isles, and is said to have been built by her after her separation from her husband, in the middle of the fourteenth century. (See also Borve.) But although doubtless occupied, and perhaps added to, by her, it is evidently a structure of an earlier time, and corresponds in its main features with the other castles of the first period in the isles. The wall of enceinte (Fig. 17), like that of Mingarry and Kismull, is of an irregular form, being constructed so as to fit the site on which it stands. This wall is for the most part ancient, but the north-eastern portion, which is thinner than the remainder, has possibly been rebuilt. The entrance doorway is in the north wall. It is small, like those of Mingarry and Kismull, and has a long narrow passage through the wall, while a wide machicolation corbelled out on the exterior defends it from above. The courtyard is irregular in its levels, the northern being several feet lower than the southern portion, and has been divided into sections with walls, which probably had steps leading from one to the other. An out- side stair in the inner side of the west wall led to the battlements. The gargoyles from the parapet walk are visible in the old part of the wall of enceinte (Fig. 18), and are similar to those of Mingarry and Kismull. The habitable buildings are ranged along the south and east walls ; none of these have the appearance of being very ancient. As is the case with most of the Western castles of the first period, a keep has been added to the great wall of enceinte at a later date. In this instance the keep is situated at the south-west angle of the enclosure. It is a square struc- ture, crowned with turrets at the angles, which have the corbelling of the fourth period. The apartment in the south-east angle seems to have been a kitchen, having a well under one of the walls and an oven in the angle. That to the north of it was probably the hall. In later times Castle-Tirrim became one of the fortresses of the Clan Ranald. It is said to have been occupied by Cromwell's troopers, and was finally burned in 1715. But its old walls of the thirteenth century still remain almost intact, and as the structure is well taken care of they may still survive for centuries to come, to perpetuate the memory of the unfortunate Lady Amie. CASTLE SWIN, ARGYLLSHIRE. A remote fortress which stands on a promontory near the mouth of Loch Swin, a long and picturesque arm of the sea, on the west side of Knapdale. It is one of the great first-period castles, of which so many are found in the West Highlands and Islands. The tradition regarding its origin is that it was built by Swin, or Sweyn, a Prince of Denmark, in the eleventh cen- tury. Possibly there may have been some primitive Danish fort on the site, CASTLE SWIN — 59 — FIRST PERIOD which gave its name to the locality ; but the existing structure has all the characteristics of the other thirteenth-century fortresses of the West. The chief feature is, as usual, a great quadranglular enclosing wall, 6 to 7 feet in thickness (Fig. 19), containing a space 70 feet by 50 feet. The wall is strengthened at the angles and in the centre of each side with broad buttresses in a manner not unlike a Norman building; indeed, this is the nearest approach to the " Norman " style of castle building to be met with amongst our Scottish castles. The projection is somewhat greater at FIG. 19.— Castle Swin. Plan. the south-east than the other angles, so as to admit of a wall-chamber (probably a guard-room) on the upper floor. A garde-robe is formed in a similar position in the north-west angle, where the wall is of considerable height towards the exterior. The gateway (Fig. 20) is in the usual style of a number of these primitive structures, such, for instance, as Duart, Skipness, and Inverlochy. The arch is semi-circular, and the opening 6 feet 6 inches wide. It is formed in a slight projection from the face of the wall, and has a long bar-hole for a strong bolt. The wall is thickened on the inside so as to make the entrance passage fully 10 feet deep, and FIRST PERIOD — 60 — CASTLE SWIN also to enable a wide platform to be constructed over the gateway for its defence. The approach to this platform was by an open staircase, of which some portions still remain. At a later date additions have been made to the original fortress at the north-east angle and along the west side. The former consists of a rectangular keep, such as we have seen was frequently added to these primitive fortresses, as, for example, at the castles of Barra and Duart. In this instance the keep is built on the outside of the enceinte, not within it, as in the latter castles. It measures 45 feet by 36 feet, and the walls are 7 feet in thickness. Owing to the slope of the site the first floor of the keep has been nearly on the level of the ground within the original castle, thus admitting of FIG. 20.— Castle Bwin. Vi«w from South- West. a basement floor beneath, which seems to have contained the kitchen and bakehouse. The oven and the water-supply spout are still in existence, as well as a dwarf wall in the centre, and a set-off round the outer walls to support the joists of the floor above. The first floor, no doubt, contained the hall, with a lord's room above, and bedrooms in the roof. The windows (Fig. 21) are all narrow loops with plain splays, similar in style to those of Dunstaffnage, Duart, and Mingarry. This keep is evidently of very old date, from the early character of its details above referred to — the narrow window-openings, with their pointed arches and plain splays, being of the same style as those we have already noticed at several of the primitive fortresses, white they also correspond with the similar features of the simple churches of the district dating from the thirteenth century. CASTLK SWIN — 61 — FIRST PERIOD There can, however, be no doubt about the fact of the keep being an addition to the original wall of enceinte, as the buttresses of the latter, which are adjacent to the keep, have evidently been completed so as to form the exterior of the enceinte, and have afterwards been incorporated with the keep ; but their original form and details have not been altered, and may still be seen. This keep may therefore be regarded as one of the earliest examples of that class of structure of which specimens of all dates up to the fourth period occur, added to the simple wall of enceinte of these primitive castles. The building at the west side consists of a round tower 25 feet in diameter at the north-west angle (Fig. 22), and a rectangular structure adjoining it. These extend to the verge FIG. 21.— Castle Swin. View from North-East. of the rock next the sea, and would strengthen the castle at this point. The round tower is well furnished with loopholes, and was, no doubt, crowned with a machicolated parapet. It commands a good view of the loch and would form a useful post of observation. There is a deep and carefully built and vaulted pit in the basement, with a drain led from it to the sea, and an aperture in the floor of the tower above. This no doubt formed the entrance to the prison or dungeon in the vault beneath from the guard-room in the tower. The adjoining square building may have comprised the quarters for the garrison. In the large courtyard some foundations of walls are observable, but they do not appear to be very old. There is also a well in the north-east angle. FIRST PERIOD 62 — CASTLE SWIN SKIPNESS CASTLE _ 63 — FIRST PERIOD The history of this castle is almost a blank. Like the other similar fortresses of the West it was probably erected by royal command in the thirteenth century. It afterwards became one of the castles of the Lord of the Isles. In 1472 it was in the keeping of Hector Torquil Macneill, the founder of the Macneills of Gigha, who held it for the Lord of the Isles. In 1481, after the resignation of the Eai'l of Ross and the insurrection of his son Angus, the keepership of Castle Swin, now again a royal castle, was granted, along with lands in Knapdale, formerly held by the Lord of the Isles, to Colin, first Earl of Argyll. Like so many other castles in the West, Swin was destroyed by Colkitto in the seventeenth century. SKIPNESS CASTLE, ARGYLLSHIRE.* This extensive and well-preserved fortress is situated at the north- eastern point of Kintyre, opposite the opening between Bute and Arran, where the waters of Kilbrannan Sound, Loch Fyne, and the Sound of Bute Fio. 23 — Skipness Castle. View from South-East. all meet. It stands on a level platform, reached by a gently sloping path, about 250 yards distant from the sea, from which it has a most imposing aspect, with its embattled keep rising proudly above its broad and massive walls and towers (Fig. 23). The castle was, in all probability, surrounded * We are indebted, for much valuable information regarding this castle, to R. C. Graham, Esq. of Skipness, who also kindly allowed us to examine a complete set of plans and elevations of the building prepared by Professor Middleton of Cambridge. FIRST PERIOD _ 64 — SKIPNESS CASTLE FIG. 24.— SMpness Castle. Plan of Ground Floor, and Section through Keep and Courtyard. SKIPNESS CASTLE — 65 FIRST PERIOD by a ditch and mound. The present road along the north side seems to occupy the site of the former, and probably the ground inclining upwards from the road is part of the sloping glacis. During the building in 1880 of the present house (which stands near the castle), " the workmen," Mr. Graham states, " found a soft piece of ground different from the surrounding soil, and had to dig into it to get a solid bottom for the foundation of the building." Mr. Graham believes this to have been a part of the moat. At a Fio. 25.— Skipness Castle. Plan of First Floor. distance of two hundred yards to the west a natural hollow forms the channel of a small stream, into which the north and south ditches may have debouched. This castle (Fig. 24) resembles in its general arrangements several of those in the islands already described belonging to the first period. It consists of a great quadrangle surrounded with a powerful wall of enceinte, and having a large keep in the north-east corner of a later date than the walls of enceinte, and partly built upon them. A square tower projects outwards from the west wall of enceinte, and another square tower is situated at FIRST PERIOD — 66 — SKIPNESS CASTLE the south-east corner of the enclosure. The walls of enceinte vary in thickness from 6 feet to 8 feet 6 inches, and are about 35 feet high. Along the south front they extend 95 feet, including the south-east tower. The greatest length is along the east side, which measures 133 feet. The interior of the courtyard measures about 109 feet by 66 feet. A two-story building extended along the inside of the south curtain, FIG. 26.— Skipness Castle. Interior of Court. as shown by dotted lines on the ground plan, and adjoining the south-east tower there was a turret stair in connection with that building, shown also by dotted lines. This stair led to the first floor, and continued to the straight stair shown on the first-floor plan (Fig. 25). By this stair access was gained to the parapet walk round the walls and to upper stories in the towers. A part of this inner wall still remains hanging out in the air a distance of five or six feet from the top of the east curtain, and SKIPNESS CASTLE 67 FIRST PERIOD another circular mass of masonry immediately over the doorway of the straight stair (shown by a rounded line on the first-floor plan) likewise overhangs considerably, all as shown by the sketch in Fig. 25. The whole of this wall and stair existed till within living memory, but they were removed many years ago, after which some building was done to prevent the overhanging stonework from falling. Another range of buildings lay along the west curtain, and seems to have been returned along the north wall in a line with the keep. This is evident from the fact that in the inner side of these walls (the south, west, and north) there are on the first floor wide window-openings splayed to narrow slits at the outside, and roofed with a sconsion arch. These slits along the west wall are from 3 to 4 inches wide and 5 feet 8 inches high, with a square recess in the wall 7 feet 7 inches wide. Those along the south wall are different on Plan (except the one immediately west of the entrance), being simply splayed openings about 5 feet 7 inches wide inside, with slits 8 inches wide by about 4 feet high ; many of them hav- ing the crossed form frequently adopted in early castles. There seem to have been no buildings along the inside of the east curtain. Originally the castle had one main entrance, which still exists in the south curtain, in the form of a projecting portcullised gateway 8 feet 9 inches wide (Fig. 27). There was also a postern in the east wall adjoining the keep, which is now built up. Exactly over it the indication of a window occurs, also built up. This was possibly used for access to a hoarding over the postern. The round arched gateway in the north curtain (see Figs. 26 and 28) has been opened up during the later occupancy of the building, and the door in the south-east tower, shown by white lines on the Plan, is modern. The entrance gateway, along with the portcullis room above it, are of considerable interest from the resemblance they bear to the gateways of other primitive castles, such as Swin and Duart. Un- fortunately the portcullis chamber is in a very ruinous and dilapidated condition. The floor, which was supported by the vaulted roof of the gateway, is gone, and the position of the portcullis slit can only be deter- mined by the grooves in the jambs below ; while the double-arched and ribbed roof is in a very frail condition. This roof, the vaulting of which is of a peculiar form, is shown on the section (Fig. 24) looking from the courtyard. In order to clearly explain this in connection with the gateway beneath, the inner wall of the room is supposed to be removed, and the interior of the room is drawn in strong lines. The portcullis room, which is constructed in the thickness of the wall (here 9 feet 9 inches), is 14 feet 2 inches long by 4 feet 10 inches wide and 10 feet high to the apex of its arched roof. It was entered from the first floor by a doorway now built up. Originally the front wall of this room was no doubt different from what it is now, and it was prob- ably provided with a wooden hoarding, such as that shown in the restored FIRST PERIOD — 68 — SKIPNESS CASTLE sketch (Fig. 27). It is quite evident that the masonry has been disturbed, and the fortified features removed, possibly at the same time that the northern arched entrance already referred to was opened out, and cer- tainly at a time when defence was no longer of paramount importance. The outer arch of the portcullised gateway was then altered, and a pointed arch constructed of long thin stones, exactly similar in workmanship to those of the north gateway, and entirely different in style from the bold, massive, and splayed voussoirs forming the ancient inside arches, seen in sketch (Fig. 27). When this new arch was erected, there can be little doubt but that the wall above was taken down and rebuilt as we now see it. (Present state.) FIG. 27.— Skipness Castle. Portcullis Gate. (Restored.) This castle was clearly intended to be one of uncommon strength ; but being easily assailable by sea, and the main entrance not being strengthened by any towers, it may be safely inferred that the gateway would be de- fended with a wooden hoarding or a stone machicolation. In the angles of the projection containing the portcullis room, two long narrow slits are introduced, which command the curtains on either side, and would be useful both for lighting the room and reconnoitring. In this castle, as in others of the same period, there are, for the sake of security, but few openings introduced in the lower part of the walls. In the keep (which, however, as we shall see, is of later date than the SKIPNESS CASTLE — 69 — F1KST PERIOD enceinte) a single loop gave light and air to the basement. This, together with a five-inch slit and a water-drain in the south-east tower, are the only ancient openings discoverable in the lower walls. It is, however, quite possible that in the south wall of enceinte there were three splayed slits, which are shown on Plan by a recess and white dotted line, and on the section above the inside formation of one of these openings is seen in elevation with a round arched top ; but there is no appearance of them outside. Before proceeding farther it should be observed that the whole of that portion of the castle lying to the north of the north-west tower, including the keep, appears to be of a somewhat later date than the rest. The FIG. 28. — Skipness Castle. View from Nurth-West. original north boundary of the castle probably extended across between the north-west tower and the keep, in the line of the south face of the latter. The portion lying to the west of the keep was probably first erected, and this appears to have been done at a time not very long after the construction of the castle, as the building is in very much the same style. The windows are, however, considerably larger and round-arched. That in the north wall is well preserved, and is shown both internally and externally in Figs. 26 and 28. There has also been a similar window on the first floor in the east wall of this addition (see Figs. 25 and 26), clearly -showing that that wall was an external one. This view is supported by the fact that the base splay which runs along the outer walls is still preserved in the FIRST PERIOD — 70 — SKIPNESS CASTLE interior of the keep, of which the wall in question forms the west side ; while the angle quoins which still remain at the north-west angle of the keep (see Fig. 28) show clearly that it was originally an external salient angle. The keep has evidently been built at a later time, so as to fill up the angle between the north addition and the original north wall, thus rendering the walls then existing to some extent available. The north extension was probably added for the purpose of giving a commodious and comparatively well-lighted hall, such as soon came to be considered necessary in all castles of any pretensions. A garde-robe is constructed in the thickness of the north-west angle. According to this view the original castle would be a nearly square enclosure, with one tower at the north-west angle and another at the south-east angle. The north-western tower has a projection of 14 feet from the face of the wall by a breadth of 16 feet 4^ inches, and enters from the courtyard level, and also from the first floor level, by a narrow- pointed doorway on each. It consists of three floors altogether. This tower, like a similar one at Rothesay Gastle, seems to have contained the latrines on the three stories, with a wide flue from each, the flues being separated from one another by a built partition, as shown by dotted lines on the ground floor Plan. The top of the tower would also be useful for defensive purposes. The allure or parapet walk on the top of the east wall (which is 7 feet 2 inches thick, and 29 feet above the ground) is in the centre of the wall, with the remains of a parapet on both sides. The outer parapet had a height of about 5 feet, but not much remains of the inner parapet. The section, Fig. 24, shows this arrangement, on the west wall instead of on the east wall, where this allure no longer exists, the east wall being now sloped on the top and cemented to protect it from the weather. The keep, as already mentioned, stands in the north-east angle formed between the original north wall and the northern addition. It is oblong on Plan, and measures 36 feet 3 inches from north to south, by 32 feet 10^ inches from east to west; 52 feet 4 inches from the ground to the top of the parapet, and 62 feet to the chimney top. A turret projects 6 feet 4 1 inches beyond the face of the north-east angle, and has a breadth of 11 feet 1 inch. The ground floor of the keep is vaulted (being the only apartment throughout the castle so treated), and enters from the courtyard. It has no communication with the upper floors except by a hatchway in the north-west corner of the vault. There is a recess about 7 feet wide by 3 feet deep in the north wall, carried up almost to the roof, where it is finely arched over. This no doubt formed the ingoing of a loop, with a shot-hole beneath opening to the north. A splay, as above mentioned (see the Section, Fig. 24), runs all along the inside of the west wall, which, together with the built-up window above, proves that this SKIPNESS CASTLE — 71 — FIRST PERIOD wall was once one of the outer walls of the enceinte before the keep was built, the splay being merely the base which is seen all round the outside of the castle. The present outside stair to the first floor (Fig. 26) is of comparatively modern construction, being doubtless of the period when the entrance through the north wall was made. In connection with this stair the east wall of enceinte has been thinned off so as to allow of a door being opened into the keep at the first floor level (see Figs. 25 and 26). The original entrance to the keep was undoubtedly from the allure of the east wall of enceinte at the south-east corner of the keep, where, at a height of about 30 feet above the ground, are the marks of a door on the outside of the keep, although no indication of it can now be traced on the inside of the wall. The entrance was thus on the second SECOND FLOOR u ii u t ' BATTLEMENTS —I FIG. 29.— Skipness Castle. Plans of Second and Third Floors and Battlements. floor, as was also the case in the keep of Lochleven Castle. From this floor a straight stair, entering by the door in the east wall, led down to the first floor, and a wheel-stair in the north-east angle conducted to the third floor and the battlements. There was also an outer door, as above mentioned, giving access to the basement from the courtyard. Each of the three upper floors (Fig. 29) consists of a single chamber about 25 feet by 19 feet, with small closets in the projecting turret. The recess or drain at the base, and the flues above, show that this turret was constructed for garde- robes on the different floors. But the loops in it being formed so as to give a view in all directions indicate that it was also available for defence. On the first floor the closet has pointed arched ribs, as s,hown by dotted lines on Plan, and has one entrance directly from the hall, and another from the ingoing of the window in the north wall, but the FIRST PERIOD — 72 — SKIPNESS CASTLE former is probably not original. The south window of this floor has been enlarged: i,o its present size in recent times. This apartment has no special fireplace, but is provided with a flue in the thickness of the wall over the north window, where a brazier or dog-grate could be placed. A door gives access to the straight stair in the east wall leading to the second floor, and also to the new door and outside staircase already referred to. A fireplace has been inserted in the second floor, and the adjoining closet in the wall built up to allow of its introduction. From this level a circular wheel-stair constructed of timber leads to the floor above and to the battlements, where there is a capehouse having a room with a fireplace and a garde-robe in the turret. It is evident from the nature of the workmanship that this capehouse is of much more recent construction than the keep. The latter, with its corbelled parapet (Figs. 26 and 28), is in the style of the third period, Fia. 30.— Skipness Castle. Plan of the Chapel. while the capehouse and the gables of the main keep seem to have been added in the seventeenth century. At a distance of about 320 yards south-east from the castle, and close to the sea, stands the chapel, which, according to Captain White in his work entitled Kintyre, is referred to in a charter of the thirteenth century (to be quoted further on) as the Chapel of St Columba. Around it is the graveyard which, as usual in mediaeval times, does not extend along the north side of the sacred edifice. The chapel is now a roofless ruin, but is otherwise fairly well preserved. It measures (see Plan, Fig. 30) inside the walls 73 feet 6 inches from east to west by 19 feet 1 inch from north to south, with side walls 12 feet high, and a gable at each end. Its external dimensions are 82 feet by 27 feet, and it is thus, according to Mr. Muir, the largest ecclesiastical structure in Kintyre, and probably in the whole of Argyll, the cathedral of lona alone excepted. But this is undoubtedly an error, as Dunstaffnage Chapel (Vol. I. p. 90) is considerably longer, and Captain White points out that the church at Saddell in Kintyre is likewise larger. Mr. Muir pronounces it to be in the advanced first pointed style which prevailed SKIPNESS CASTLE — 73 — FIRST PERIOD in Scotland during the thirteenth century. The entrance doorway is in the south wall, 20 feet 6 inches from the west end, and in the opposite wall there is another door, at the distance of 10 feet 11 inches from the west end : both of these are pointed. The chancel door is also in the south wall, 1 2 feet 2 inches from the east gable, and is round arched. The jamb and arch mouldings of the first mentioned doors are extremely simple, as will be seen from the sketch section (Fig. 31) ; the other two are built up, as are also the three eastmost windows of the south side, large family monuments having been erected against that wall. The principal entrance, as will be seen from the Plan, has a bar-hole inside for securing the door, an unusual arrangement in a church. At Stobhall there is a similar provision for security, the necessity for which, however, is easily understood, the church having been built at the Reformation in connection with the old and proscribed faith, and there being a dwelling- house attached, entering by the same door. At Temple Church, Midlothian, also a similar bar-hole occurs. The windows, of which there are four on the south side, two on the north, and one in the west gable, are all pointed lancets. The daylight of the side windows measures 13| inches wide by 4 feet 2 inches high, splayed inside to about 50 inches wide (Fig. 31). The east window is of two lights with a central mullion (Fig. 32). The daylight of each lancet is 15% inches by 8 feet 1 1 inches high. The splays of the mullion and the jamb mouldings do not coincide, as will be observed from Fig. 32, which probably arises from the mullion having been renewed. A rough recess, as if formerly a piscina or locker, exists in the south wall at the east end. Over the west gable there has been a belfry, but it is now quite ruinous. Beneath it is a square-headed slit, with a hole through the wall beneath, worn vertically to the outside by the action of the bell-chain. The copestones are all wrought on level beds as a part of the walling, to which excellent practice we probably owe the preservation of the gables to this day. Mr. Muir remarks that the castle (which he, however, does not describe) "is supposed in part to be coeval with the chapel itself." There can be no doubt but that they are contemporary, the few and simple details of each exactly coinciding and corresponding with those of other structures of the same date. Skipness Castle and the Chapel of St Columba thus form an exactly parallel case with that of Dunstaffnage, as in both we have a chapel out- side the castle walls, almost undoubtedly of the same period as the fortress. FIG. 31.— Skipness Castle. The Chapel : Details. FIRST PERIOD 74 SKIPNESS CASTLE From the following charter, dated 1261, it is evident that both the chapel and castle at Skipness were in existence at that early period. The charter, which, with other information on the subject, will be found in Captain White's work, runs thus : — " To all the sons and the faithful of holy Mother Church who may see or hear this present writing, — Dufgal, the son of Syfyn, greeting, — Be it known to your community " (i.e. the Paisley monks) " that I, in respect of charity and out of my own pure free-will, and with assent of John, my FIG. 32.— Skipness Castle. The Chapel : Details of East Window. heir, have given, granted, and by this present charter of mine confirmed, for the welfare of my soul, of my spouses Juliana and Johanna, and of my ancestors, as well as successors, to God, S. James, and S. Mirinus of Passelet, and to the monks now or hereafter ministering (Deo Servien- tibus) at that same place, the right of patronage of the Church of S. Colmanel, which is situated in my territory of Kentyr, for the purpose of a free, pure, and perpetual almsgiving, with all pertinents, lands, liberties, and easements (aysiamentis), which do or shall appertain to the ACHANDUIN CASTLE — 75 — aforesaid church, together with the Chapel of S. Columba, which is situ- ated close by my castle of Schepehinche (Skipness), after the decease of Clement, rector of the same church ; to be had and held in perpetuity by the aforesaid monks of Passelet, as freely, quietly, peacefully, and honour- ably, and quit of all secular burden, as the aforesaid monks hold and possess, other churches by any one's gift throughout the whole kingdom of Scotland," /// JV 1 '--, ?***&—-;•*:'£ ^ :^L FIG. 119.— Skelmorlie Castle, from North-East. sorts of cooking utensils ; with stores of barrelled meat and wine, full kists, large and small, with cattle, sheep, corn, and "beir," and numerous other articles, all carefully priced and printed at length in The History of the County of Ayr, by James Paterson. Law Castle is situated on an eminence overlooking the village of West Kilbride. "It is supposed to have been," says Dobie, "built about 1468 for the accommodation of the Princess Mary, sister of James IIL, on her marriage with Thomas, Master of Boyd, afterwards Earl of Arran," and THIRD PERIOD 182 LITTLE CUMBRAE CASTLE, KTC. it continued to be one of the residences of the house of Boyd till 1670, when William, third Earl of Kilmarnock, alienated this property to Major Hugh Bontin. The island of Little Cumbrae was from an early period under the guardianship of the Hunters of Hunters ton, but in 1515 "a Letter was addressed by the Privy Council to Hew, Earl of Eglintoun," making him keeper of the island " quhill the King's perfyte age of xv yere," because FIG. 120.— Skelmorlie Castle. South- West Corner of Offices. Robert Huntare " is iiocht of power to resist ye personis yat waistis the samyn without suple and help."* In these circumstances we may conclude that the castle was built by Lord Eglinton. It was certainly one of the residences of the family, as we learn from the following quotation from the burgh records of Glasgow, of date 1568, which is further interesting as giving an instance of the early use of glass for windows, and the care * Font's Cunningham Topographised, p. 190. BARR CASTLE 183 THIHD PERIOD with which it was employed. " Hew Erie of Eglintoun, contracted with George Elphinstoun, glassin-wricht, burges of Glasgow, that the said George suld uphald and mantene the places of Ardrossan, Eglintoun, Polnoiie, Glasgow, and Cumray in glassin warke, as also the place of Irvin," for all which he is to receive yearly " twa bollis meill, and ane stane cheis," " and gif it happinis the said Erie to hald hous in ony of thir foir-saidis places when it sal happin, the said George to wirk, the said George shall have his meit the time that he wirks, and als when the said George tursis creillis of glas and leid to Irvyn, Ardrossan, Eglintoun, and Cumray, the said Erie sal caus ane carrage hors to turs the samyn out of Glasgow." We further learn from Principal Baillie's Letters that when Cromwell invaded Glasgow he (the Principal) found refuge " in the Isle of Cumbrey with My Lady Montgomery." Skelmorlie Castle is finely situated about two miles south from Weniyss Bay. It was built about 1502, and belonged to one of the branches of the Montgomeries. In 1852 the castle was leased by Mr. John Graham, merchant in Glasgow, and, with the consent of the Earl of Eglinton, it was restored and incorporated with a large mansion erected by Mr. Graham. Fig. 119 shows what still remains of the old keep, and Fig. 120 shows a tower which formed part of the courtyard containing the offices, which are still preserved. BARR CASTLE,* LOCHWINNOCH, RENFREWSHIRE. This castle is situated in an extensive old park, about one mile west from the village of Lochwinnoch. The building is in tine preservation, and, although uninhabited, is well cared for. It is a simple parallelogram on Plan (Fig. 121), measuring about 35 feet 6 inches from east to west, by 26 feet from north to south. There has been a courtyard on the west side containing buildings, as indicated on the Ground Plan. The entrance to the courtyard is by a round arched doorway in the north side, which is defended with shot-holes in the wall adjoining (Fig. 122). There was also a wing on the south side of the keep, which existed down to this century ; it had a door of communication with the keep, as shown on the Plan of the first floor. The entrance doorway to the keep from the courtyard is by a porch (see Fig. 123), which is, however, of a later con- struction. There was likewise a high door over this, entering on the first floor level, but this has long since been built up. The ground floor contains two vaulted apartments entering from a small lobby. One of these is the kitchen, with finely arched fireplace, 11 feet wide by 4 feet 6 * The measured Plans (Fig. 121) are from drawings prepared by W. Galloway, Esq. , architect, and kindly placed by him at our service. THIRD PERIOD 184 — BARR CASTLE inches deep. At the back of the fireplace is the usual drain, and an inflow for water supply. The wheel-stair, which ascends to the four upper floors and battlements, is placed in the north-west corner. The hall on the first floor measures about 24 feet by 17 feet. It is BATTLEMENTS THIRD FLOOR FIG. 121.— Ban- Castle. Plans. lighted with four windows, one on each side, and has a large fireplace in the west wall. In the north-east corner is a mural closet, which may have been a sleeping place, as it measures about 7 feet by 3 feet 9 inches, and has two small slits for ventilation. There is a sink in the hall, and also various cupboards. The joisting of the floor above has rested on a BAKU CASTLE — 185 — THIRD PERIOD moulded projecting course of masonry. A narrow private stair in the south-west corner leads to the second and third floors, to which the main stair likewise gives access. These floors were probably each divided into two apartments, there being garde-robes provided for that number of rooms, besides various mural chambers. The battlements (Fig. 122) extend all round the building. The corner turrets have been roofed in, and had probably enclosing doors. The FIG. 122.— Bari^Castle, from North-East. corbelling which supports the parapet wall of the east front is not laid level. This has arisen either from design or carelessness, and does not appear to be due to any sinking of the foundations. There are various inscriptions on the building; over the porch (Fig. 123) are the letters I. W. and M. H. On the lintel at the foot of the stair are carved the initials L. H. I. C., with the date 1680 ; and on the battlements there appear the letters and figures W. O. 1699. THIRD PERIOD — 186 — CARRICK CASTLE Crawfurd, in his History of Renfrewshire, informs us that Barr was " the seat of an ancient family of the surname of Glen," and that about the end of the sixteenth century it was in the possession of a branch of the Ferguslie Hamiltons, with whom it remained till about the end of last Fio. 123. — Barr Castle. Entrance Porch. century. Certain of the above initials indicate this connection, but the castle would appear to have been erected early in the sixteenth century. It quite corresponds in design and arrangements with Law Castle and others of that date in the West. CARRICK CASTLE, LOCH GOIL, ARGYLLSHIRE. This remarkably fine specimen of a fifteenth-century keep is situated near the lower end of the west side of Loch Goil, on an isolated low- lying rock jutting out into the loch, which protects the castle on the east side, as the wall of the courtyard there rises out of deep water. The word CAKKICK CASTLE — 187 — TUIUD PK1UOD " Carrick," we understand, means a craig or rock. The castle (Fig. 124) is a simple oblong on Plan, with the north-west corner cut off at an angle of 45°. This angle is slightly hollowed in the lower part, and gets straight about the middle of the height of the wall (Fig. 125). None of the floors have been vaulted, which is singular in such an early building. PLAN OF. SECOND FLOOR PLAN OF FIRST FLOOR Fio. 124.— Carrick Castle. Plans. There is no projecting parapet at the top, the battlements being flush with the general face of the walls. Numerous gargoyles were provided for throwing off the water from the parapet walk, but all of them are more or less broken. The keep bears a considerable resemblance to Threave in some of its details, but it is of more refined workmanship, and is probably somewhat latar in date. THIRD PERIOD — 188 — CARRICK CASTLE |"'l^M////f;/;.:^ i!/j(|f WitfnnWnilnWi'tli CARRIOK CASTLE - 189 - THIRD PERIOD Most of the arches are pointed and moulded, the larger ones having hood mouldings, and the lintelled windows along the top have all arched ingoings; but the arches are not all alike — some, as shown on Fig. 126, are provided with broad splayed ribs, while others are moulded on edge, and have plain polished arched soffits. Some of the smaller arches of the windows and doors are angular instead of curved — i.e., formed by two stones leaning against one another, as shown in the entrance to the stair (Fig. 126). The entrance archway to the courtyard is three-centred, and, like all the others, beautifully and accurately wrought ; indeed, throughout the castle the masonry round all the openings is of the finest kind, composed of carefully wrought fine freestone. As not unfrequently happens, the fineness of the stone has to some extent proved the ruin of the structure, many of the wrought stones having been taken away for use elsewhere. But for this intentional destruction, the building would have remained almost entire. ,It sadly wants some little propping up where damaged as above indicated.; while the south gable above the parapet may be said to be hanging in the wind, and cannot much longer remain in its present condition. The approach to the castle is along the south side, where the courtyard gate is situated. The courtyard is small, and follows the configuration of the rocky site. The buildings along its north side are entirely ruinous. The entrance to the ground floor of the castle was near the centre of the east wall, but it has been completely pulled to pieces, and the whole floor is filled up with ruins. There seems to have been no communication from this floor upwards, except by internal ladders or stairs now gone. The principal entrance to the castle was, as usual, on the first floor level, and gave access directly into the spacious hall, which measures 56 feet by 24 feet. Three of the windows of the hall, as well as the door, are provided with bar-holes (see Plan), an unusual circumstance, and doubtless intended for the reception of bars to strengthen the shutters which closed the window openings. Two of these windows have stone seats in the recesses. From the ingoings of the entrance doorway, near the centre of the east wall, two stairs branch off on either hand. Both lead upwards ; that on the right, looking outwards, leads to the second floor only. Fig. 126 shows the entrance to this stair, with its angular top, leading off the ingoing of the door. The pointed door on the floor above, at the south end of the castle, shows the entrance from the stair landing, and the smaller pointed door adjoining is the entrance to a garde-robe. The stair on the opposite or left-hand side of the principal entrance leads to what must have been the north room of the upper floor, and from thence con- tinues to the battlements. Both of these stairs are contained in the thick- ness of the east wall. The passage giving entrance to them is placed, not in the centre of that wall, but a little nearer the south end, so as to give THIRD PERIOD 190 — CARRICK CASTLK Fro. 126.- Carrick Castle. South-East Corner of Interior. OARKICK CASTLE — 191 — THIRD PERIOD increased length for the longer stair leading to the battlements. There are four very perfect and entire garde-robes in the castle — two on the first floor and two on the second, nearly over each other. Their shoots, with sloping sills, discharge on the top of the rock, and are large, and finished with pointed arches (Figs. 125 and 127). The shoot from another garde-robe exists near the base in the splayed north-west corner, but where it comes from is not apparent. On the first floor there is a large gap in the inside of the west wall, where the masonry has been roughly torn out. This was probably the FIG. 127.— Carrick Castle, from Sonth-East. fireplace ; but a remarkable thing about it is that its flue must have passed in front of one of the windows of the upper floor, which has been built up ; but from the fireplace upwards, owing to the rough treatment it has received, a great portion of the masonry has fallen away, which makes it difficult to decide what the original state was at this part. Possibly this fireplace is an insertion at a later time, and the window above may have been built up at that time, and the chimney carried up in the wall above the parapet, which has the appearance of being more modern than the wall below. Adjoining the fireplace a drain leads THIRD PERIOD - 192 — KAMES CASTLE through the wall. On the outside of this wall, between the fireplace and the splayed corner, there occur the rybats of an opening (see Fig. 125), but with neither lintel nor arch on top. To this there is nothing cor- responding inside. The fireplace just referred to (if it was one) is the only fireplace in the castle ; but from the arched soffit of the window, in the splayed corner on the second floor, a flue leads up to the battlements (it is shown in outline on the Second Floor Plan), where the stump of a chimney still remains, so that a fire could evidently be kindled in this window recess, and the smoke would escape by the flue overhead. This seems rather a primitive device, and is all the more remarkable from occurring in a castle of such fine workmanship and material as this. In the east wall of the courtyard there is a narrow postern to which boats can come up at any state of the tide. It is generally believed, and it seems quite probable, that the water formerly surrounded the castle. We have met with little reliable information regarding the history of Carrick Castle. Almost nothing seems to be known about it. It is said to have been the residence of the family of the Murrays of Dunmore, and is also supposed to have been used as a hunting lodge by the Scottish kings. KAMES CASTLE,* ISLAND OF BUTE, BUTESHIRE. There are two castles of this name within half a mile of each other ; one of these, which is not illustrated, was on the Z Plan, and is now a total ruin. The castle here illustrated is situated on a level plain within a few hundred yards of the sea. It was evidently moated, as traces of a ditch are still visible, and a burn flows past on the south and east sides. The original building (Fig. 128) seems to have been a simple keep of five stories in height, with one apartment on each floor. It measures about 36 feet by 25 feet 6 inches, with walls about 5 feet 4 inches thick. The round arched entrance doorway is situated on the north side at about 2 feet above the ground. There does not appear from the Plan to have been any stair from the ground floor to the upper floors, so that in all probability the first floor was reached by a ladder which gave access to a door at a high level. . As within the main tower there is no stair from the first floor to the upper floors, it seems probable that the north-east wing containing the scale and platt stair may be a part of the original design, or a later enlarged edition of a small wing which contained a wheel-stair. From the landing of this stair on the attic floor it will be observed on the Plan that in the thickness of the east and north walls * The Plans of this castle have been kindly supplied by Mr. Bryce. KAMES CASTLE — 193 — THIRD PERIOD was u narrow passage with steps leading out to the battlements on the west side. The modern O. G. roofed turret seen in the Sketch is over this passage at the north-east corner. During some alterations the battle- ments have been continued along the north side as shown on View ; previously they terminated as shown on Plan. PLAN or TOP FLOOR GROUND FLOOR FIG. 128.— Kames Castle. Plan and View from North-West. The Bannatynes of Kames can be traced back as far as the time of Alexander in. They appear to have been chamberlains to the Stewart kings when Bute formed part of the royal property. The existing structure seems to date from the sixteenth century, but the greater portion of the upper part is quite modern. N THIRD PERIOD — 194 — HUNTERSTON CASTLE GIFFEN CASTLE, AYRSHIRE. This ancient fortalice, which is situated between Beith and Dunlop, occupied a strong position on the edge of a scar, and rose conspicuously above the undulating country around, from which a most commanding prospect is obtained. It is now unfortunately reduced to a mere frag- ment. After being deserted for over a century, during which time a great part of the castle was taken down, the remainder fell in 1838. Some curious carved stones from the castle are built into the walls of Giffen Mill, about a mile distant. Sketches of these and of the ruins before they fell, with minute particulars of the castle and its owners, will be found in Dobie's edition of Cunningham by Pont. " Sir William Montgomerie, second son of Sir John Montgomerie of Ardrossan, received in patrimony from his father the lands and barony of Giffen," evidently about the middle of the fifteenth century, and the property continued in the Montgomerie family till 1722. HUNTERSTON CASTLE, AYRSHIRE. A keep, with a modern house attached, standing on a level plain about half a mile inland from the Frith of Clyde, and about midway between FIG. 120. — Hunterston Castle. Plans and Section. Largs and West Kilbride. In. ancient times a morass stretched round the castle, with a protecting moat and rampart, all of which have now IIUNTERSTON CASTLE — 195 — THIRD PERIOD disappeared, the morass being changed into cultivated land and a beauti- fully-wooded park. The original keep (Fig. 129) is of small dimensions, measuring about 24 feet 6 inches by 21 feet 6 inches, and about 34 feet high to the top of the parapet. It contained four stories, of which the undermost is vaulted, and was probably the store. It has no fireplace, but there is the usual stone drain, and an opening for a hoist in the arch overhead, but no other communication with the floor above. The main entrance was on the first floor, from which a wheel-stair in the thickness of the wall led to the topt The parapet walk is protected by a battle- ment projected on small corbels round three sides only (Fig. 130). The Fio. 130. — Hunterston Castle, from North-East. corbelling ceases near the end of the north wall (see Fig. 130), and the parapet is continued round the east side flush with the walls of the keep. This has probably been an alteration made when the wing was added to the east. The walls of the keep are nearly 5 feet in thickness, and it has generally the character of a structure of the beginning of the sixteenth century. The keep was enlarged, apparently in the seventeenth century, by the addition of the building shown by hatched lines on the Plan, thus converting it into a house of an oblong plan, with a staircase turret project- ing in the middle of the south side (Fig. 131). In this turret is the entrance doorway, on the ground floor, and the circular staircase which gives access THIRD PERIOD — 196 — HUNTERSTON CASTLE both to the old and new parts of the structure. On one of the skew stones of the staircase turret are the initials R. D. (see Sketch, Fig. 131). The new building has been divided by timber partitions into apartments, and probably at the same time the old hall on the first floor was screened off from the wheel-staircase and garde-robe. This hall is still used as an occasional room by Colonel Gould Hunter Weston, the proprietor, and is fitted up as a library. The large old stone fireplace has been filled in with a smaller one, probably at the time the additions were made. The caps of the ancient fireplace are still in position, as shown on the Section (Fig. 129). Above it is an old painted hatchment con- Fio. 131. — Hunterston Castle, from South- West. taining the Hunter arms, with the motto CURSUM PERPICIO. The building is in good preservation, and was the family residence till the erection of the present mansion house (which is in the immediate neigh- bourhood) in the early part of this century. There were ranges of offices attached to the castle, on the south side, which no longer exist, the site being now occupied by a modern homestead. The small courtyard on the south side seems, however, to be old. What remains is very picturesque, and comes on the visitor as a surprise, owing to its not being visible from any distance. Hunterston derives its name from the office of Hunter, or Venator of the King's lands, held by the family from a very early period. SADDELL CASTLE 197 — THIRD PERIOD SADDELL CASTLE, ARGYLLSHIRE. Saddell Castle is situated on the Kintyre shore of Kilbrannan Sound. It occupies a low-lying situation at the base of a thickly-wooded hill not far from the ruins of Saddell Abbey, and was, it is believed, at one time surrounded by the sea.* ENTRANCE COURTYARD GATEWAY BATTLEMENTS THIRD FLOOR FIG. 132.— Saddell Castle. Plans. The abbey is an utter wreck, but fortunately the castle is well preserved, and is cherished with pride by its owner, Colonel Macleod. It is an oblong keep (Fig. 132), measuring about 48 feet 10 inches by 28 feet, and 50 feet 9 inches in height from the ground to the top of the battlements. The entrance door is on the east side, and adjoining it is a wheel-stair, which juts into the interior of the tower and ascends to the * New Statistical Account. THIKD PERIOD - 198 - SADDELL CASTLE top of the building. The ground floor is vaulted, and is about 4 or 5 feet below the level of the passage at the entrance door. It contains two cellars, from the smaller of which — that on the left hand — a private stair leads up to the first floor. This cellar also contains a garde-robe with shoot. The arrangement of the first floor, with the kitchen cut off from the end of the hall, recalls other examples above described, also situated in the locality of the Frith of Clyde — viz., Little Cumbrae, Law, Fairlie, and Skelmorlie. In these cases, however, the arrangements can only be made out from the ruins, while at Saddell they can still be seen in their entirety. The kitchen is 7 feet 6 inches wide, with an arched fireplace extending to 5 feet 6 inches more. It contains the usual oven and various ambries. Beside the kitchen, and to the south of the staircase, there has been a small apartment, and the hall probably occupied all the space north of the kitchen partition, although it is now divided into two apartments. The second floor is divided into four apartments, three of which have original fireplaces ; and one of the windows on this floor has a stone seat, with a garde-robe entering from the ingoing. The third floor is divided into three apartments ; the centre room, which is without a fireplace, has a seat in the window and a garde-robe, while the irregularly-shaped south room has a mural closet entering from its window. Over the east recess off this room two arches are thrown, so as to give increased thickness for carrying the masonry of the battlements above. The partitions dividing the various floors into the rooms just described are probably of a later date than the keep, as are also most of the fittings. The gable of the capehouse over the staircase is seen in the view (Fig. 133). It was fitted with doors, and access is obtained from it right round the battlements, which are laid with stone. At the four corners of the tower there are round open bartizans supported on large corbels, having openings in the spaces between for defence. A similar turret occurs at one side of the capehouse, and it is likely that originally a corbelled defence of the doorway was continued across in front of the capehouse, but this seems to have been altered in the seventeenth century. The parapet round the tower is 4 feet 8 inches high, and is carried on large corbels, but of a lesser size than those of the turrets, while the spaces between are closed. The Bernardine Cistercian abbey, which is almost all destroyed, is situated in a beautiful valley shut out from the sea. It was founded by Reginald, Lord of the Isles (son of Somerlid), between 1166 and 1207.* It remained an independent foundation till about the year 1520, when David Hamilton, Bishop of Argyll, obtained its annexation to his See. Previous to this, however, in 1508, " the abbey lands were made a barony, and license to build castles within Kintyre, and fortify them with stone * Proceedings of Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, Vol. x. p. 205. SADUKLL CASTLK — 199 — T1IIUD PERIOD walls, ditches, &c., including what is termed le Muchcoling, was given to Bishop David," who received from James iv., for the maintenance of its keepers, the " fermes, here, and aitis " of " Kilyownane and Lochea."* FIG. 133.— Saddell Castle, from South-East. From the following accountf the castle had apparently become ruinous in the seventeenth century: — " Betwixt the years 1640 and 1674, William Ralston of that ilk, who married Ursula Mure, daughter to William Mure of Glanderston, was * Proceedings of Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, Vol. vm. pp. 125 and 128. + Robertson's Ayrshire Families, Appendix, Vol. in. p. 51. THIRD PERIOD 200 — SORN CASTLE forced to seek shelter from the rage of persecution which at that time prevailed in the Lowlands of Scotland; came to the bay of Saddell, about eight miles from Campbelton, and having built the ramparts which still remain on the Castle of Saddell, there resided for some time. She lies interred in the churchyard of St. Colinkeil." It was probably at this time that the present internal fittings were put in. SORN CASTLE,* AYRSHIRE. An ancient fabric, to which a modern mansion has been added, finely situated on the crest of the precipitous bank of the River Ayr, about one and a half miles from Catrine. It is probable (as suggested by Mr. Railton) BASEMENT FLOOR. FIG. 134.— Sorn Castle. Plans. that the south-west portion (Fig. 134) is an old keep, and that the north- east portion is a later addition, the floors being on different levels. By this enlargement a great hall, 29 feet by 17 feet, was obtained on the first * The Plans have been kindly supplied by Mr. Bryce, and the elevations by Mr. Railton. BAKU TOWER — 201 — THIRD PERIOD floor, and two cellars and a kitchen on the ground floor. The thick wall which contained the kitchen fireplace and chimney still remains at the north-east end. A parapet, with ornamental corbelling and bartizans (Fig. 135), has been carried round the building at the time when the above additions were made, probably the end of the sixteenth century. SOUTH-EAST ELEVATION NORTH-EAST ELEVATION Fio. 135. — Sorn Castle. Elevations. The corbelling closely resembles that of several other Ayrshire castles of that period, such as Fairlie. In the beginning of the fifteenth century the manor of Sorn was acquired by Andrew Hamilton, third son of Sir David Hamilton of Cadzow, ancestor of the Dukes of Hamilton. It after- wards passed by marriage and purchase to the Earl of Winton and the Earl of Loudoun, and is now the property of James Somervell, Esq. BARR TOWER, GALSTON, AYRSHIRE. A solid tower, standing on a rock slightly raised above the level of the road, in the middle of the town of Galston, about five miles south- east from Kilmarnock. It is also called Lockhart Tower, from the name of the former proprietor, Lockhart of Barr, a family of ancient standing in Ayrshire. The keep (Fig. 136) measures about 48 feet by 35 feet, and the walls are about 7 feet thick. The entrance doorway is on the first floor level, and the circular staircase to the upper floors starts from the ingoing. The windows have wide square recesses, and are furnished with stone seats. These, together with the numerous wall recesses in the thick walls, and other features, indicate that the tower belongs to the Third THIRD PERIOD 202 - MAUCHLINE CASTLE Period. Externally it has been much modernised, and has entirely lost its original character. It is now used as a wool store, and amidst the Fia. 13(3.- Barr Tower. huge piled up bales it is with some difficulty that one can see and measure the architecture. MAUCHLINE CASTLE, AYRSHIRE. The old tower of Mauchline, standing on the edge of the small stream which runs through the town, strikes one at first sight as being somewhat different from an ordinary Scottish keep. Its situation is not a strong one, and its ashlar walls, its round-headed mullioned windows, and care- fully constructed garde-robes with their covered shoots, are features which confirm that view. On turning to its history the peculiarity of its character is accounted for. The lands of Mauchline were granted in the twelfth century by Walter, the High Steward of Scotland, to the monks of Melrose, who established a cell there, and greatly extended their possessions. In 1521 Hew Campbell of Loudoun, availing himself of the perturbation then existing amongst the monastic institutions in anticipation of their being broken up, made a contract with the abbot, whereby he was appointed Bailie of Barony, and finally became possessed of the whole as a temporal lordship in 1606. The existing tower is the only relic of the ancient priory. There is nothing to indicate for what purpose it was originally used, but it may well have been the residence of the prior. It consists (Fig. 137) of two vaulted floors, with walls 5 feet in thickness, and an attic floor in the roof. The outer door is situated at the south-west angle, and communicates with the first floor by a wheel- stair (Fig. 138) in the same angle of the tower. The first floor has been a handsome hall, 25 feet by 20 feet, vaulted in two bays with groined arches springing from carved corbels, but it is now in a sad state of MAUCHLINE CASTLE 203 — THIKU PBBIOO neglect and decay. Besides the garde-robes, there are several wall- chambers. The window in the north gable has been large, and is still furnished with stone seats. From the style of the architecture it is evident that the building belongs to the fifteenth century. It may possibly have undergone some repairs when it was secularised — as, for example, the square-headed Flo. 137.— Mauclilinc Castle, from North-East. windows may then have been inserted, and much more recently the battlements have been restored. Although not, strictly speaking, a castellated edifice, this example is important as showing the similarity in general plan and arrangement of ecclesiastical and civil dwelling-houses in the fifteenth century. In the eighteenth century the property had fallen into the hands of Mr. Gavin Hamilton, an early patron of Burns, who spent much of his time during a very eventful period of his life in this town and in this THIRD PERIOD — 204 — PENKILL CASTLE house. Buildings in the style of last century had then been erected so as to form a courtyard southwards from the tower. Of these the exterior | M I I i I I I I | FIG. 138.— Mauchline Castle. Plan of First Floor. is seen in the Sketch (Fig. 137), and the window on the ground floor is that of the room in which Burns was married. PENKILL CASTLE,* AYRSHIRE. This castle stands in a commanding position on the south side of the valley of the Girvan Water, about three miles from Girvan. Before its Fio. 139.— Penkill Castle, from South-East. * For the Plans and View of this structure we are indebted to Alexander George Thomson, Esq., architect, Glasgow, by whom they were made in 1857, when he was employed by the late Spencer Boyd, Esq. of Penkill, to restore the castle. PKNKILL CASTLE — 205 — THIKD PKBIOD restoration in 1857 it was a deserted ruin, as shown by Sketch (Fig. 139). The oldest part of the building was fairly well preserved, having its roof entire. It consisted (Fig. 140) of a square keep, measuring about 26 feet 6 inches by 21 feet 6 inches, and was about 34 feet high to the top of the walls, with a round tower at the north-east corner, which contained the Fio. 140.— Penkill Castle. Plans and Section. entrance doorway and stair to the upper floors. The stair was, however, in a complete state of ruin. The ground floor was vaulted and lighted by narrow slits in each wall. The first floor and all the other floors contained one apartment, the former with a large fireplace and ambry beside it. In the north-west corner there seems to have been a garde-robe afterwards THIRD PERIOD — 206 — CASTLE, AILSA CRAIG slapped through, so as to form a communication to a later addition. The second floor had a plain fireplace, with an arched window containing stone seats. The floor above was lighted by a fine dormer window on the east front, shown in Fig. 139, and from this floor two round turrets, one on the north-west and the other on the south-east corner of the keep, were entered. An addition to the castle was built in the seventeenth century along the north end, and consisted of a building of unknown length from east to west, by about 20 feet in width. The west gable of this structure and part of the north and south walls were entire in 1857. In the Castles and Mansions of Ayrshire, by A. H. Millar, F.S.A. Scot., it is stated that Penkill was probably built about 1500, although he adds that the late Mr. G. E. Street, architect, considered that it belonged to an earlier period from the " style of ornamentation of one of the existing dormer windows." We do not know on what authority this statement rests, but the whole style of the building would lead us to conclude that Penkill was of a much later date. Mr. Millar further mentions that in 1628 the addition to the castle was made by Thomas Boyd, after his marriage with Marion Mure of Rowallan, the new building being connected to the old by the circular stair tower, and that the arms and initials of Thomas Boyd and his wife were placed over the door of this tower. Penkill was acquired by the Boyds early in the sixteenth century, the first of them dying in 1530. The dotted line on the Ground Plan shows the addition designed by Mr. Thomson, architect. CASTLE, AILSA CRAIG, AYRSHIRE. A small keep, perched on one of the few shoulders which project from the precipitous slope of the solitary " Craig." GROUND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN FIG. 141.— Castle, Ailsa Craig. Plans. The island rises abruptly from the sea, about 10 miles west from the Ayrshire coast, opposite Girvan. CASTLE, AILSA CRAIG — 207 — THIRD PERIOD On the seaward side the rocks tower above the water in magnificent precipices, but on the landward side there is a small beach, composed of masses of stones fallen from the Craig, above which the flank of the island mountain slopes very rapidly to the summit, which is about 1100 feet in height. On a ledge about 300 feet above the shore stands the keep (Fig. 141), the only approach to which is by a very steep and narrow footpath. In the^ vicinity of the tower, but higher up the mountain, there is a good FIG. 142.- Castle, Ailsa Craig. View from South-East. spring of water. The history of this remote and inaccessible tower is quite unknown. The structure bears some resemblance to the Tower of Kildonan in the south of Arran, and may perhaps have been erected by a branch of the clan to which it belonged. In any case it must have been the fortress of a pirate chief, who issued from it to plunder the surrounding seas and coasts, for the island would never yield the sustenance necessary for the captain and his crew. THIRD PERIOD - 208 - CASTLE, AILSA CRAIG The keep stands on the south-east side of the Craig, and the entrance door has been on the east or seaward side, where the access was most difficult. From marks and projections on the wall, there seems to have been an outer stair leading up to the doorway (Fig. 142). Outside of the door, the landing at the top of this stair would doubtless be moveable, as in other similar examples, such as Castle Stalcaire. Taking advantage of the slope of the site, a vaulted basement is formed under the eastern portion of the ground floor. This was entered by a trap in the landing at the entrance door, and had one very small loop for ventilation. It may either have been used as a storeroom or as a prison. Opposite the entrance door, another door gives access to the vaulted room on the ground floor, 14 feet by 11 feet, which is lighted with three small loops. The door in the north wall of the landing is modern, and may occupy the position of a loop for lighting the landing. A straight stair- case leads from the same landing to the first floor, and is continued upwards as a wheel-stair. The first floor contains an apartment 11 feet 3 inches wide by 8 feet long, lighted with two windows in the south wall, and a small loop in the north wall. It is provided with an arched fireplace which extends the full width of the room, and has an oven in the north-west angle. There is also an ambry in the north wall. On this floor another small vaulted room, about 6 feet square, occupies the space over the entrance landing. It is lighted with an oblong window about 2 feet high, placed at 7 feet above the floor. An opening in the wall between these two apartments seems to have been used as a service window. The larger room may have been the kitchen, and the small one the larder and storeroom. Above this there appears to have been a second floor. It is now almost entirely destroyed, but there are recesses at the angles, which render it probable that they were finished with turrets. This quaint and strongly-built and vaulted little tower has few features by which its age may be fixed. The thinness of the walls (2 feet 6 inches) and the arrangement of the stair and apartments seem, however, to connect it with the style and date of many of the Border keeps of the beginning of the sixteenth century. A courtyard about 30 feet long by the width of the keep appears to have existed on the north side, the east wall being continued northwards about 4 feet in height, so as to level up the ground, while there are indications at the north-east and north-west angles of the junction of courtyard walls to those of the keep. CARLETON CASTLE — 209 — THIRD PERIOD CARLETON CASTLE, AYRSHIRE. The ancient tower of the Cathcarts of Carleton, a well-known Ayr- shire family (also the proprietors of Killochan Castle). It stands on rising ground near the sea-coast, at the mouth of the Lendale Water, about seven miles south from Girvan. The estate has been in the hands of the same family since the time of Robert Bruce, and the present proprietor, Sir Reginald Cathcart, " has in his possession a charter by that monarch in 1324, and another from Robert n. in 1386."* The tower is undoubtedly of considerable age. It is of the usual quadrilateral form (Fig. 143), and has had a vault over the ground floor and another over the hall floor, part of which still remains (Fig. 144); otherwise the structure is much ruined, Fio. 143.— Carleton Castle. Plan of Ground Floor. the south-east angle having entirely fallen out and the parapet being gone, so that the architectural interest of the building is comparatively slight. The walls are 6 feet in thickness. The entrance door was probably at the south-east angle and at the level of the hall floor, into which it would give direct access. On one side of the entrance passage a narrow stair (which still survives) led down to the cellar, and on the other a wheel- stair in the south-east angle (now demolished) led to the upper floors and roof. There were separate stories in the vaults over the basement and hall, so that the tower was at least five floors in height. Some traces still exist of a wall enclosing a courtyard on the tongue of land between two burns, on which the tower stands, with vestiges of towers at the angles. * Paterson'a History of Ayr and Wigton, Vol. n. p. 135. I THIRD PERIOD — 210 — LOCIINAW CASTLE FIG. 144.— Carleton Castle, from South-East. LOCHNAW CASTLE, WIGTONSHIRE. This castle is situated in the parish of Leswalt, on a small fresh- water loch about five miles west from Stranraer. The locality is one of considerable beauty, and the utmost has been done to develop the natural features of the scene, so that the surroundings of the castle are of a very charming description. The old keep is completely cast into the shade by a large modern house which has been erected beside it, the towers of which are seen in the View (Fig. 145). The old building (Fig. 146) consists of a square sixteenth-century keep at the south-east corner of a courtyard, which is surrounded with ranges of seventeenth and eighteenth-century buildings. The keep is a small struc- LOCHNAW CASTLE — 211 — THIRD PERIOD Fia. 145.— Lochnaw Castle, from East Fio. 146.-Lochnaw Castle. Plan. THIRD PERIOD — 212 — LOCHNAW CASTLE ture, about 23 feet square, containing one apartment on each floor, with a continuous wheel-stair in the north-west corner, finished at the top with a picturesque capehouse (Fig. 147). Adjoining this a portion of the parapet is projected, so as to form an aperture or machicolation for defending the door by dropping down stones or other missiles. On the east parapet a Fro. 147.— Lochnaw Castle, from North-East. projection is corbelled out to form a passage round the chimney, at each side of which there are small shot or spy-holes. The buildings on the south and west sides of the courtyard were erected by Sir Andrew Agnew and his wife, Dame Anna Stewart, daughter of the first Earl of Galloway. Their initials, with the Stewart RUSCO CASTLE - 213 — THIRD PERIOD arms and date (1663), may be seen on the dormers (Fig. 147). They are also carved in another place, with the inscription, " Except the Lord Builde the House they Labour in vaine that Builde." The range on the north side is dated 1704. The family of Agnew, as is well known, have been possessed of Lochnaw from almost the beginning of written Scottish history. Whether the following inscription, which exists at the house, refers to the existing keep may, however, be doubted — DOM. ANDR EAS. AGNEV 1426 NOMEN. DOMI NI. FORTISSI MA. TURRIS. In The Hereditary Sheriffs of Galloivay an earlier castle is spoken of as being situated on an island in the loch. This, along with the lands, was forcibly taken possession of and blown up by Archibald the Grim in 1390. In 1426 the Douglases resigned the Bailiery of Leswalt back to Andrew Agnew, and he is said to have then built this tower. It bears some resemblance to Law and Barr Castles in Ayrshire, and may be classed with them in the Third Period. When the first Statistical Account was written, there were vestiges of the fosse to be seen on the south side, and it is further stated that at that time the loch was drained. RUSCO CASTLE, KIRKCUDBRIGHTSHIRE. A tower situated in the valley of the Fleet, about three miles north from Gatehouse. It stands on a sloping hillside, and is completely over- looked from the public road, which passes it about 100 yards to the west- ward. The Plan is a simple oblong (Fig. 148), measuring 37 feet 9 inches from north to south, by about 28 feet 8 inches from east to west, and the tower is 49 feet 6 inches high to the top of the parapet. The entrance is on the ground level in the centre of the east front ; and to the right on entering, in the thickness of the wall, is a small guardroom. A passage to the left leads to a wheel-stair in the south-east corner, which ascends to the top, and is defended at the foot with a strong door. The ground floor is vaulted, and contained a room in the vault, the entrance to which is seen in the Section (Fig. 148), about 8 feet 9 inches above the ground. This was probably the sleeping-place for herds and servants, while the ground floor might accommodate horses or cattle. In the south-west corner of the ground floor there is a circular recess, the purpose of which is not now apparent ; but it may have been intended to contain a private THIRD PERIOD — 214 — RUSCO CASTLE stair from the hall to the cellar. The first and second floors are good apartments, well lighted, with handsome fireplaces of the usuaK Scottish type, similar to that of Ruthven Castle.* The apartment in the roof, shown on Plan, is without a fireplace. It enters off the stair, which continues for a few steps up to the battlements. The parapet walk is paved with stone slabs in the usual manner. The corbels supporting the SECTION FIG. 148. — Rusco Castle. Plans and Section. parapet wall are of the chequered type common in the fifteenth century (see enlarged Sketch, Pig. 149). It will be observed (Fig. 150) that the large windows have each over their lintels a splayed projecting weathering for throwing off the rain — a rather unusual expedient in Scottish castles. The entrance doorway (Fig. 151) is peculiar, being spanned with a joggled arch, nearly straight, but having a slight curve, with rounded * Vol. i. p. 397. HUSCO CASTLE — 215 — THIRD PEKIOD corners. Above it is ;i moulded panel containing two shields, but their bearings are worn away and illegible. The supporters of the upper one — two unicorns — are, however, quite distinct, and probably were attached to the royal arms. Above one of the shields is the initial N, and above the other there is, acccording to Lands and tJieir Owners, a hunting-horn, "pertaining to the arms of the Blairs of Dunskey." On one side of the lower shield can be faintly seen the figures 65 — probably for the date 1565. Although the FIO. i49.-Rusco Castle. * . Corbels at Parapet. author of Lands and their Owners considers the house to have been built by the Ackersons, who possessed the estate previous to the sixteenth century, that does not seem, to judge from its FIO. 150.— Rusco Castle, from South-East. THIRD PERIOD — 216 — RUSCO CASTLE style, to be at all likely. Besides, he also says that in the lower shield " are the arms of the Gordons, with the usual boar's head, . — Glengarnock Castle. Caps at each side of a Fireplace. there seems to have been a wheel-stair in the south-west corner leading to the top. There is a handsome round arched window in the west wall of the hall, overlooking the stream, some 60 feet or so beneath ; there are also two narrow windows in the south gable. The fireplace must have been in the part of the east wall next the courtyard, now destroyed. The buildings round the courtyard have been at least two stories high, and have been, like the whole castle, well and strongly built. A curious fireplace occurs in the north wall of the front building. The jamb mouldings with their capitals, which alone exist, the lintel or arch being gone, do not correspond in design, as will be seen from Sketch (Fig. 225). We are satisfied that this is original, and that the fireplace, which is 10 or 12 feet above the ground, has not been tampered with. The buttress-like wall jutting outwards at right angles from the north boundary wall has been constructed to intercept the passage of any climber attempting the castle round the north side. The postern shown a little further to the west leads out to the steep face of the hill side, and may probably have been meant for a secret exit. The building marked Kitchen on the south side of the courtyard is complete on the ground floor, and is vaulted. Its low doorway at the west end has a three-centred arch, 2 feet 7 inches wide, and a bar-hole inside. The apartment is lighted by a window on the south side, at a considerable height above the ground, and by a small pointed window (seen in View, Fig. 224) towards the courtyard. Its fireplace is a neat arched projecting structure, of smaller size than usual in kitchens. At the opposite end are what seem to be the remains of a drain. The present gap in the curtain forming the entrance is wider than the original entrance gateway ; and in the ingoing of the north side of the gap, about 10 feet above the ground, there exists what seems to have been an ambry, like those seen in the ingoings of windows, thus leading to the conclusion that buildings existed above over the gateway. The ambry is shown by white lines on the north side of the gap. On the opposite side there exists on the inside the commencement of an arch ; and it seems highly probable that there has been an arched passage or pend leading to the courtyard with apartments over — as at Balvaird and elsewhere. Glengarnock, like many other Scottish castles of the Third Period, is an example of a keep with a courtyard attached, round which various buildings have gradually accumulated. The courtyard walls, like those of Doune, have round corbelled turrets at the angles, shown by lines on the Plan. These have perpendicular openings or machicolations (as at Saddell), meant for use in defence. Glengarnock has thus the usual characteristics THIRD PERIOD - 296 - CRAIGIE CASTLE of the castles of the Third Period. It is certainly not a thirteenth-century structure, as has been sometimes stated. The barony of Glengarnock belonged, at the end of the thirteenth century, to the family of Cuningham, with whom it remained till the first quarter of the seventeenth century. In the Scottish Journal of Topography (Vol. ii. p. 89), the castle is said " to have been abandoned as a residence, and shortly afterwards to have fallen into ruins, early in the last century." The same authority states that " the materials for building several farm-houses have been at different times torn from the structure," and that a storm in 1839 overthrew the missing wall of the keep. CRAIGIE CASTLE,* AYRSHIRE. The ruins of this once extensive castle are situated about five miles south from ^ilmarnock, on the south-western slope of Craigie Hill. They stand on a grassy knoll rising out of a plateau, and appear to have been surrounded by a ditch. It is greatly to be regretted that this fine specimen of Gothic Castel- lated Architecture should have been allowed to fall into such a state of ruin as it now presents, for it undoubtedly contained one of the finest specimens of a vaulted hall to be found in Scotland. Its groined arches are quite equal to any of those in our abbeys or churches, while amongst castles its only rivals of the same period have been at Tulliallan, Both- well, and Auchendoun. The neighbouring castle of Dundonald also con- tains a ruined vaulted hall ; but there the vaulting was not true groining, as pointed out in the notice of that edifice, but the spurious kind referred to in the Introduction to this volume. The hall (Fig. 226) is on the ground floor, and, along with another extended building, has divided the castle into two equal halves, with an eastern and western courtyard. It measures (Fig. 227) about 46 feet from east to west by 21 feet from north to south, and the vault was about 25 feet high to the central ridge rib. The vaulting is divided into three bays (Fig. 228), and the ribs spring from beautifully carved corbels all of different design (Figs. 229 and 230). A section of the rib mouldings is given in Fig. 229, from which it will be seen that the diagonal ribs differ from the transverse ribs, and both from the ridge ribs. The hall was lighted by three windows on each side, placed high up between the wall ribs. These windows, although extremely simple, have a very striking and massive appearance. They are small, measuring only about 3 feet 6 inches high by about 14 inches wide. They are lintel led externally and * We are indebted to Mr. Railton for a Plan and Section of Craigie Castle, which, along with our own measurements and sketches, have been of service in preparing the various drawings accompanying this notice. CUAIUIK CASTLE - 297 - T1I1UD PKUIOD V\\\\NMM I \ \\ \ '• I ! 1 1 I I i I I I II I ' -11' ' ' ' ' ' ' /'' ' •' ''•'•'•. XHTRANCE , , PEND FIG. 220. - Cruigic Castle. General I'laii. Fio. 227.— Craigie Castle. Plan of Hall (enlarged). THIRD PERIOD _ 298 — CRAIGIE CASTLE splayed towards the inner face of the wall, till they reach a breadth of nearly 8 feet, where they are arched with a chamfered semi-circle rising from a corner bead or nook shaft, finished with a simple moulded cap. The height of the opening on the inside face of the wall is about 10 feet. The springing of the arch of a window in the west wall still exists, but the east wall is entirely gone except the foundations. The ruined fire- place is near the south-east corner of the hall, and the flue is carried up in the centre of one of the windows just described. This window has Fia. 228.— Craigie Castle. Hal), from West. apparently been built up to allow the flue to pass, but whether this is an alteration or a part of the original intention is not clear owing to the ruinous condition of the structure. In the north gable there is a round dungeon-like vault, measuring about 11 feet by 8 feet. This was entered from the wheel-stair, which is shown by a circle on Plan, as having existed at the north-east corner. Outside the south gable of the hall there appears to have been a continuation of the keep southwards, as indicated by the ruins of the vaulted apartment shown on the Plan. The total length of CRA1GIE CASTLE — 299 — THIRD PEHIOD this block, including the keep, has been about 98 feet from north to south by about 36 feet in width over the walls. Above the vaulted hall there was an apartment of the same size, lighted with side arched windows, as shown in the internal elevation (Fig. 231). These windows had stone seats, and the fireplace was in the north gable, as shown by one of its jambs which still remains (see Fig. 230). Fio. 229.— Craigie Castle. Details of Hall. This upper apartment has also been of fine construction, but it is now irrecoverably gone. The entrance gateway and passage into the castle appear to have been at the north-west corner and along a roadway outside the west curtain wall. At the gateway there was probably a kind of entrance pend or arched passage, with a circular tower or bastion at the north end. Within the enclosing wall was a courtyard surrounded by buildings. From the THIRD PERIOD — 300 — CRAIGIE CASTLK courtyard there was an entrance door into the great hall, which is now and has been for long built up. The other courtyard on the east side of the great hall seems to be quite cut off from the one just referred to by the keep. It has had various enclosures and vaulted chambers, but no definite plan can now be made out ; possibly an enclosing wall surrounded the castle on the north side and left room for communication round the north end of the keep. FIG. 230.— Craigie Castle. Hall, from South. The castle evidently dates from the fifteenth century, although it is not all of such an early period. There is a wide-splayed shot-hole adjoin- ing the entrance passage which probably indicates work of the following century. The lands of Craigie were in the possession of the Lindsays from an early date. About the year 1371 John Wallace of Riccarton married the heiress of Craigie and obtained the property. The Wallaces thereafter quartered the Lindsay arms with their own, and it is mentioned in local works that a shield bearing that quartering is built into the wall of the farm steading of Craigie Mains, near the castle. ARDROSSAN CASTLK — 301 — TIIIKD PERIOD 1 Fio. 231— Craigie Castle. Section of Hall, looking East. The Wallaces are said to have resided at Craigie till 1600, when they removed to the castle of Newton-on-Ayr. After that time Craigie seems to have been allowed to fall into ruin. ARDROSSAN CASTLE, AYRSHIRE. Only a few fragments remain of this once powerful fortress of the Montgomeries. The lands were acquired by that family through marriage Fio. 232.— Ardrossan Castle. View from North-West. THIRD PERIOD 302 — ARDSTINCHAR CASTLE about 1376. The ruins stand on a knoll overlooking the town and railway station. The castle is said to have been destroyed by Cromwell, and there now only remain (Figs. 232 and 233) a portion of one tower, a vaulted kitchen, and two cellars. FIG. 233.— Ardrossan Castle. Plan. The former retains a few corbels of the parapet and the jambs of a fireplace, a loophole, &c. These and other details indicate a date probably in the fifteenth century. Various alterations have evidently been made at subsequent times — windows being built up and shot- holes and gargoyles introduced into them, &c. ARDSTINCHAR CASTLE, AYRSHIRE. This castle was the seat of the Kennedies, lairds of Bargany. Though now reduced to a fragment of the keep and a few foundations of the walls, it was once a place of some extent and importance. It stands close to the village of Ballantrae, near the mouth of the River Stinchar, on a rocky height commanding the entrance into Carrick from the south, both by the coast and by the valley of the Stinchar. The Historie of the Kennedyis states that the castle was built by Hugh Kennedy in. the middle of the fifteenth century. He was " ane secund broder [of Dunure] quha wes first putt to haue bein ane Freir ; bot his ARDSTINCIIAR CASTLE — 303 — THIRD PERIOD currage, not agreabill to sa base ane office, lost the same, and passitt with the Laird of Blaquhame to France, to Chairllis the vii., in the yeir of our Lord 1431. He was callit Freir Hew," and so pleased the King of France that he remained with him many years, accompanied him to the Holy Land, and re- ceived from him "in recom- panse of his seruice, mony gritt rewairdis of gold and mony ; and abuiff all, he. gaiff him leiff to weir airmis quar- terly in his airmis, to wit, flour-de-lyse, quhilk that hous weiris to this day." " He com to Scotland, and bocht the ten pund land of Arsten- sar, and buildit the house thairof, and conqueist mony ma Fin. 235.— Ardstinchar Castle. Keep, from South-East. FIG. 234.— Ardstinchar Castle. Keep, from North-East. landis, be the benefeitt ofi' the stipend of the King of France. This Freir Hewis oy wes callit ' Com with the penny,' quha conqueist the grittest pairt off all the lewing, quhilk now is ane gritt rent." The castle has been of con- siderable extent, the buildings having occupied an irregular platform about 120 feet from north to south and about the same from east to west. The outline can be traced, but the structures are almost entirely gone. The entrance gate was apparently at the north-west angle, and the keep, a small part of which only now exists (Figs. 234 and 235), occupied the highest point at the eastern THIRD PERIOD — 304 — ARDSTINCHAR CASTLE angle. The corbels of the parapet are the only details, and they are of the simplest pattern. Towards the end of the sixteenth century a deadly feud arose between the laird of Bargany and the Earl of Cassillis, in consequence of which 7 FIG. 236. —Kennedy Monument, Ballantrae. Bargany, with a few attendants, while returning from Ayr, was attacked by the earl with about thirty horsemen. Bargany was wounded and carried to Ayr, where he died, and his body remained in a leaden coffin in the kirk. Some time afterwards (1605) Lady Bargany died also, and was laid beside her husband in the Kirk of Ayr. The funeral of both being DUNGLASS CASTLE — 305 — THIRD PERIOD resolved on " in the new kirk of Ballantry ; quhilk the lady had caussitt build for hir husband, quhair scho had gartt sett wp ane glorieous towme," great preparations were made, and the funeral was attended by several earls and noblemen and about a thousand gentlemen, with their attendants. " His sister-sone, young Auchindrayne, beirand the Banner of Rewendge, quhairin was payntitt his portratour, with all his wondis, with his sone sittand at his kneyis, and this deattone writtine betuix his handis, 'JUDGE AND RKWEXDGK MY CAUS, o LORD ! ' and sa conwayit to Air ; bur all werry honourabilly, to the number off ane Thousand horse, of Gentil- menne ; and layd in the foirsaid Tome." The tomb still exists, the " aisle " or wing built by Lady Bargany having been preserved when the rest of the church was demolished, about the beginning of this century. It is an excellent example (Fig. 236) of the " glorious tombs " which it was the fashion to erect in the seventeenth century, and of which several examples are given further on. This aisle and tomb still constitute the last resting-place of the descendants of the ancient family of the Kennedies of Bargany. DUNGLASS CASTLE, DUMBARTONSHIRE. This fragmentary castle stands in the immediate vicinity of Bowling, on an irregular rocky cliff washed by the River Clyde, near the point where the broader estuary narrows into the river. "I I I I Kv- Fio. 237.- -Dunglass Castle. Plan. U THIRD PERIOD — 306 — DUNGLASS CASTLE The castle has suffered a great amount of demolition and spoliation, so that now only a very imperfect idea can be formed of what it was before FIG. 238.— Dunglass Castle. View from South-West. 1735, when the Commissioners of Supply made an order for using it as a quarry for repairing the quay. This work of destruction was only stopped when the place was purchased by Mr. Buchanan of Auchen- torlie. The top of the cliff was enclosed with a high wall, of which the portions shaded black on the Plan (Fig. 237) still remain, mixed up in parts with modern work. The most considerable portions now existing are the south and west walls, against which buildings were formerly erected, as is apparent from the small windows in these walls (Fig. 238). At the outside of the south wall, near its west end, there is a small landing-place from the river. This appears to have been protected by a hoard- ing in the castle wall, some of the corbels for which still remain. Over the door in this wall are the remains of a row of corbels, round the walls or a considerable part of them FIG. 239.— Dunglass Castle. North-West Turret. These probably ran (see Fig. 238). DUNGLASS CASTLE — 307 — THIRD PERIOD ' FIG. 240.— Dunglass Castle. Tower. Two corbels occur at the small break in the projecting part of the south front. They are only a few feet above the rock, and are quite accessible. Being on the outside of the castle, they appear as if they would be useful to the enemy rather than to the in- mates. But these corbels probably supported the flue of a garde-robe or other structure now removed. At the north-west corner of the enclosure a dwelling-house has been erected. It is partly old, but mostly modern. The north-west turret, with its chequered corbelling (Fig. 239), indicated by dotted lines on the Plan, gives an idea of what its features have been ; but the interior of the house is entirely modern. There are no other ancient details about the structure except the gateway in the north wall, with some narrow slits, all adjoining the house. The round tower (shown on Plan and by Fig. 240) is probably of the seventeenth century. It appears to have been a pigeon-house. The north-east corner, where the obelisk stands to the memory of Henry Bell, is considerably the highest part of the enclosure. Dunglass was the chief stronghold of the barony of Colquhoun. From 1439 to 1478 the castle was occupied by Sir J. Colquhoun, Chamberlain of Scotland. In 1480 Lady Luss had a liferent of the lands and fortress, and was bound to keep the latter in good repair. The letters V. C. are said to have been carved over one of the door- ways, and they are believed to repre- Fio. 241.-Dunglass Castle. Colquhoun Arms. Sent Humphrey Colquhoun of Luss, who was treacherously slain at Ban- nachra in 1592,* and by whom the more modern house is believed to have been erected. On the corbel of the north-west turret (Fig. 241) there is a rude carving of the Colquhoun arms — a saltier impaled — with the letter C. alongside, and a face rudely carved on a shield. , * Irving's Dumbartonshire. THIRD PERIOD — 308 — MUGDOCK CASTLE MUGDOCK CASTLE,* STIRLINGSHIRE. This ancient castle, the home of the Grahams, and the probable birth- place of the great Montrose, is situated in the parish of Strathblane, about seven miles north from Glasgow. It is now in a very fragmentary condition, but from what remains one can see that it has been a large and important fortress. It stands in an upland district on the west side of Mugdock Loch (Fig. 242), a small sheet of water covering less than fifty acres, but which has evidently been at some former period of greater extent than it is now. Fio. 242.— Mugdock Castle. Plan. The ground around the castle is very irregular. From the chapel to the south tower (Fig. 243), a distance of about 320 feet, there runs a fairly level ridge, with a steep bank sloping down from the north side of the chapel to the old level of the loch. From this point the ridge bends round towards the east and south for about 200 yards, in the form of a peninsula, so that one half of the castle bounds (on the north and east) was protected by water ; while the remaining half, which along the south side lay in the track of the present roadway, was doubtless secured round the south and west sides by a ditch with a rampart, over which there was probably a drawbridge opposite the portcullis gate. What remains of the castle (see Fig. 243) comprises part of the north-west wall of enceinte, with a square tower at either extremity ; portions of the south-west wall, with the jambs of the portcullis gate ; and the chapel and other buildings, which stand detached to the northwards. Extending from * We are much indebted to the proprietor, J. Guthrie Smith, Esq., for assistance in preparing the Plan and notice of Mugdock. MUGDOCK CASTLE the flatter southwards, for a distance of about 200 feet, the foundations of a wall have been traced (as shown by lines on Plan), while scattered about the ground in various directions fragmentary pieces of wall have at different times been disclosed ; but these are not in sufficient masses to afford much additional in- formation. The tower at the south-west corner is almost entire. It is an irregular square on Plan, of about 24 feet in diameter, and con- tained four • stories. It measures 59 feet in height at the south-west corner, from the ground to the top of the parapet wall. The first floor is spanned by a vault supported on broad splayed ribs, similar to the vault at Tester. On the ground floor, in the thickness of the wall, and up a few steps, there is a very complete garde-robe, having no visible outlet, but that would be without doubt to the ditch, and may probably be con- cealed by a bank of earth and vegetation. The entrance doorway was on the first floor (Fig. 244), and was originally reached by a ladder from the court- yard, there being no internal communication between it and the ground floor. From the first floor a wheel-stair in the south-east corner gives access to the second floor, at the — 309 — THIRD PERIOD FIG. 243.— Mugdock Castle. Plan. THIRD PERIOD — 310 — MUGDOCK CASTLE level of which the wheel-stair ends, there not being sufficient thickness of wall above to accommodate it. The second floor is on the same level as the top of the wall of enceinte (Fig. 245) ; and the manner in which the latter buts against the tower gives ample thickness for such a stair in the lower stories. From the second floor upwards a straight flight of steps in the east wall leads to the top of the tower, where the battlements, which are in good preservation, consist of a high parapet wall without embrasures. The roof of the tower is modern, but is exactly of the same form as the old roof, which had to be taken off a few years ago and repaired. This FIG. 244. — Mugdock Castle. Interior of Courtyard. tower may or may not have been the keep of the castle. It is quite likely that it is merely one of the mural towers — of which there were probably several round the enceinte — and its appearance favours this idea. It is a remarkably interesting example of good workmanship, with several pointed doors, and one which is lintelled, and has the jambs curved so as to form a corbel at each side beneath it. The other tower, which is situated at a distance northwards of about 54 feet, is very ruinous, only the vaulted ground floor remaining. It also enters from the courtyard, and the ground floor has had no communication with the floors above. The curtain wall between these towers is nearly entire. The doorway MUGDOCK CASTLE — 311 — THIRD PERIOD (see Fig. 245), adjoining the south tower and passing through the curtain, is comparatively modern. This curtain wall seems to have received against the interior a large apexed roof, the triangular form of which — evidently of old construction — can be seen upon the wall which finishes square above the roof. The gateway, which is 8 feet 4| inches wide, is very ruinous, but still retains (as shown on Plan) the rebates for outer and inner folding wooden FIG. 245.- Mugdock Castle. View from South-West. gates, and the groove for a central portcullis. Unfortunately no remains are preserved of the upper chamber, in which the apparatus for working the portcullis would be placed. About 30 feet south-east from the gate- way a small fragment is the only remaining portion of this wall still existing (see Fig. 243). Of the chapel (shown on the Plan and referred to above) not much can be said, as all the stone dressings and indications of ecclesiastical work have been destroyed. That it was a chapel is the tradition of THIRD PERIOD - 312 - DALZELL CASTLE the district, and there is nothing in its plan which contradicts this idea. It measures internally 40 feet from east to west by 17 feet 3 inches from north to south ; and although the walls are thin, and the building seem- ingly stands outside the walls of enceinte, it resembles in these respects the chapels of Dunstaffnage and Skipness. The tower, which projects northwards from the chapel, seems to have been a latrine, the termination of two large flues (now filled up), such as are usual in similar buildings, being visible in the outside gable above the steep bank. A modern mansion has been built in the centre of the courtyard by John Guthrie Smith, Esq. This is connected on the first floor with the old tower by a covered passage carried on a bold stone arch, so that the tower now forms a part of the modern mansion. Its preservation is thus secured, and all the other parts of the ruins are also carefully protected. The portion of the Plan shown by hatched lines consists of a row of offices, probably dating from the seventeenth century. The estate and castle of Mugdock were in the possession of the Grahams from early in the thirteenth century, and it is quite possible that the existing ruins are part of the castle referred to in a deed signed in 1372 " Apud Manerium de Mugdok." A more modern mansion seems to have been erected, as frequently happened, within the ancient walls, probably in the sixteenth or seven- teenth century. According to Mr. J. Guthrie Smith, it is stated by Spaldmg in his history* that in 1641, when Montrose was a prisoner in Edinburgh Castle, Lord Sinclair, by direction of the Committee of Estates, " violently brak up the gates and doors " of the place of old Montrose, and that they also demolished his " staitly house of Mugdok" Mr. Smith observes that the castle " was only partially destroyed at this time, for the earl was living there in retirement for some time before he started on his famous campaign of 1644." The same authority tells us that "the part of the house fronting the loch and one of the towers (the northmost shown on Plan) were allowed to fall into ruins after they were harried by the Buchanans in 1644." Out of the remains of this harried and burnt mansion a nondescript house was erected in 1655 of no architectural interest, with which a vaulted cellar of the old building was incorporated. It was used as a dwelling-house till about thirteen years ago, when it was removed, and the present fine mansion erected in its stead. DALZELL CASTLE,f LANARKSHIRE. The residence of Lord Hamilton of Dalzell, situated about two miles south from Motherwell. The site of the castle is on the steep bank of a * History of the Parish of Strathblane. t We are much indebted to Lord Hamilton of Dalzell for his kind assistance in the preparation of this description, and for the use of the Plan of the castle. DALZELL CASTLE — 313 THIRD PEItlOD brawling burn, which runs in a deep and rocky gorge along the east side of the building, winding round the south side a little further off, so as to leave space for terraced gardens at various levels. The situation of the castle is very charming and romantic, the varied undulating ground studded with ancient trees, and the wild rocky glen formed by the burn contrasting with the majestic sweep of the Clyde, which flows past a little to the southwards. William Cobbett, who visited Dalzell in 1832, in describing the castle and surroundings, says that it is the place at which, if he were compelled to reside in Scotland, he would choose to live. !j Fio. 246.— Dalzell Castle. Plan of Ground Floor. The buildings, which are of three periods, form a courtyard, as shown on Plan (Fig. 246), where the part tinted black indicates the keep, occupy- ing the centre of the east side. This is the most ancient portion of the structure, and is doubtless of the Third Period, probably early in the six- teenth century. The hatched portions extending on either side and along the south, together with the west enclosing wall, show the portions next erected during the seventeenth century ; while the buildings on, the north side, shown in outline, were constructed about 1857, from designs by the late Mr. R. W. Billings, architect, who stayed here for the greater part of THIRD PERIOD — 314 — DALZELL CASTLE three years superintending and working with his own hands at the carrying out of these and other extensive alterations then effected by Lord Hamil- ton. The Plan here shown is a reduced copy of one made by Mr. Billings, portions of the modern buildings, which are very extensive, being omitted. The original castle, as we have seen, was well defended by nature along the east and south sides, and there were indications of a moat along the west side. The two entrance gateways in the western enclosing wall, one of which is seen in Fig. 247, were originally smaller doorways. FIG. 247.— Dalzell Castle. View from West. They are represented in a water-colour view of the castle made in the early part of the century. The keep is a massive structure, measuring about 39 feet by 32 feet and 48 feet high to the top of the parapet on the east side next the burn (Fig. 248). It has a curious and unusual projection at the south-west angle, like the flat buttress of a Norman keep. The projection is 2 feet 9 inches by about 17 feet in breadth, and contained in the centre the original entrance doorway. This break in the wall does not go to the top, and was probably connected with the defence of the entrance. Imme- diately inside the doorway was a portcullis, the grooves for which still remain, and there was probably a small chamber above for working it. DALZELL CASTLE 315 THIRD PERIOD The keep consisted of a vaulted basement, with a lofty vaulted hall above, which was divided into two stories, having carved corbels carrying Fio. 24S.— Ualzcll Castle. View from East. an intermediate timber floor. Above this was another story, /with wall- chambers and galleries ; while on the level of the battlements there was the usual chamber in the roof. The stair from the entrance passage THIRD PERIOD — 316 — DALZELL CASTLE ascends by a straight flight to the first floor in the thickness of the south wall, from which level it continues to the top in a wheel-stair in the south-east corner of the tower (Fig. 249). The hall floor was also entered by an outside door in the north wall at the level of the first floor, 10 or 12 feet above the ground. This door is exactly opposite the lower door, but a story higher, and was approached, previous to Mr. Billings' alterations, by an outside stair. It was without doubt originally reached in the usual manner by a moveable ladder, the outside stair having probably been constructed at the time of the extension of the castle. The alterations effected on the keep by Mr. Billings consisted in form- ing a new principal entrance to the castle, by cutting the triangular-headed FIG. 249. -Dalzell Castle. Plan of First Floor. doorway (shown on Fig. 250) through the west wall of the keep, which is about 7 feet thick. To make room for this doorway, Mr. Billings says * that a two-inch arrowlet was removed, as was also a similar one in the opposite wall to admit of the enlarged window shown on Plan. He further men- tions that " the loose slaty rock and tenacious clay of the dungeon floor was then excavated to the required depth, so as to obtain sufficient height of ceiling, and by the simple and comparatively uncostly means adopted, we at once obtained our object of access and communication, combined with a highly characteristic, light, and roomy hall of entrance." " In excavating the clay from the dungeon we went below the foundations, and under- * See Building News, 1859, p. 581. DALZELL CASTLE — 317 — THIRD PERIOD building became necessary." He describes the foundation as being in a very unsatisfactory state. " By the unbroken, sloping surface line of clay, which is fully two feet lower on the south side than on the north, Fio. 250.— Dalzell Castle. South-East Angle of Courtyard. we saw clearly that the massive walls had been simply founded on the natural surface of the ground without the slightest attempt at bedding the stones on a level, and that, instead of making the ground flat, the builders had brought the walls to a horizontal line by roughly wedge- THIRD PERIOD 318 - DALZELL CASTLE shaping the masonry. The whole castle had thus stood for centuries on a sloping bank of clay, with moisture enough continually passing over its face to have slipped the whole mass at any moment." On the hall floor (see Fig. 249) — now the dining-room — Mr. Billings enlarged the windows, put in a new fireplace, took out the intermediate floor, and pulled forward the corbels already referred to, which supported it, in order to make them serve as trusses for ribs inserted by him on the under-surface of the arch. All the corbels except one were renewed. The old ones (a sketch of one of which is given, Fig. 250) were built into the walls of the terraced gardens, where they still remain. There is a singular sculptured figure, with outstretched arms and lolling tongue, in low relief in the present south entrance to the hall. The gables and roof of the keep, with the capehouse of the stair, were restored by the late Mr. Maitland Wardrop, architect, before Mr. Billings appeared on the scene. Although Dalzell has always continued to be inhabited by the ancestors of Lord Hamilton, it would appear that it had become partly ruinous, when the seventeenth-century additions to the castle, on the south side of the courtyard, were undertaken. These present some peculiarities which will be noticed as we proceed. The additions referred to comprise a new entrance doorway and a large wheel-stair erected against the south-west corner of the keep, which coincide, as will be seen on Plan, with the flat buttress projection. Behind this was placed a new vaulted kitchen with a large fireplace, measuring about 11 feet by 6 feet inside, and projecting 5 feet externally, which forms a very picturesque feature, as seen from the opposite side of the burn (see Fig. 248). There was evidently no kitchen in the original tower, and, as often happened, this was one of the first additions found necessary. Running along the south side of the courtyard are various lofty vaulted cellars — the chamber at the extreme end being a second kitchen of about twice the size of the one just noticed, or 23 feet by 19 feet 6 inches, with a large fireplace in the thickness of the west wall, and having a stone conduit for the supply of water in the fireplace (not shown on Mr. Billings' Plan). Another arched conduit exists for supplying water from the courtyard. A passage leads from this kitchen to a vaulted round tower at the south-west corner of the castle (see Fig. 246). This portion of the building was supposed by Mr. Billings to date from the fourteenth century, and to be the oldest part of the castle ; but there is nothing to indicate a period so remote. The walls are not of the massive kind found in structures of that date ; and in the castles of a subsequent date it is invariably found that the keep is the nucleus around which the other buildings have gathered in the course of successive generations. DALZELL CASTLK _ 319 — THIRD PERIOD At Dalzell there is no sufficient reason apparent for supposing any other order of events to have occurred, but rather the reverse ; and this brings us to the peculiarities just referred to, which seem to show that this kitchen and south-west tower are rather later than the south-east part of the addition now under consideration. In the middle cellar of this wing there will be observed on the Plan projections on either side, connected with dotted lines running obliquely across the room. These details indicate the remains of an ancient fireplace, the dotted lines representing its arch. This fireplace seems to have belonged to a room (probably a kitchen) which occupied the space into which a staircase now penetrates, and has been altered when the buildings were continued westwards. It is, however, possible that a portion of the west gable of the newer kitchen, with the whole of the west enclosing wall (except where altered by Mr. Billings), may be as old as about the time of the erection of the keep. Fio. 251. — Dalzell Castle. Shield over Window of Staircase. Owing to the numerous alterations which have occurred, the various levels at the junction with the keep are different, and require a compli- cated arrangement of steps, which is rather puzzling at first sight. On the first floor level of the southern wing a massive wheel-stair is boldly projected into the courtyard upon a series of corbels, and rises the full height of the wing ; it is crowned with a pointed roof (see Figs. 247 and 250). The whole of the first floor of this wing has been modernised inside. It consists of the drawing-room and ante-drawing-room, with very elaborate plaster ceilings, wholly the work of Mr. Billings, and done by his own hands. Most, indeed, of the new ornamental work and stone and plaster was executed by him personally. In the wall of the library there is a small ambry about 5 feet above the floor, and measuring 2 feet wide. It was originally protected in front by wire netting, and is supposed by Lord Hamilton to have been a shrine for holding a sacred figure. The floors above this added wing contain part of the bedroom accommodation of the castle. Over one of the windows of the large staircase adjoining the keep, as seen in Fig. 250, and in THIRD PERIOD - 320 BOGHALL CASTLE the enlarged Sketch (Fig. 251), occur the initials, twice repeated, I. H., with a shield, and the date 1649. Fig. 252 shows the tympanum of the window above. The barony of Dalzell was in the possession of a family of that name from the end of the thirteenth century till 1647, when it was acquired from Lord Dalzell, Earl of Carnwath, by James Hamilton of Boggs, ancestor of the present proprietor, Lord Hamilton. James Hamilton was a nephew of the Dalzells, FIG. 252.— Dalzell Castle, and it is his initials and arms which have just been Tympanum of Window referre(J to. in Staircase. BOGHALL CASTLE, BIGGAR, LANARKSHIRE. The town of Biggar occupies an important strategic position, being situated in the strath by which the vales of the Clyde and Tweed are almost joined together. It was at this point that a branch of the Roman road diverged from the main north route of " Watling Street," and led down Tweeddale towards the standing camp on the Lyne. This position has therefore doubtless been always regarded as a valuable one, and been occupied by a place of strength. Biggar possessed from the twelfth century a free rectory ; and in 1545 a collegiate church was founded by Lord Fleming, a large portion of which is still preserved. The possessors of the barony can be traced back to the twelfth century. About the end of the thirteenth century it passed by marriage into the hands of the family of Fleming. They were supporters of Bruce ; and Malcolm Fleming, of the Galloway branch, was created Earl of Wigton. The family occupied a prominent position in the kingdom during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, and served their country well both at home and abroad. Some of them filled important posts, such as High Chamberlain, &c. ; and in 1458-9 the Fleming of that date was created a peer, with the title of Lord Fleming of Cumbernauld. For a time the title of Earl of Wigton, borne by the elder line of Fleming, was in abeyance ; but it was revived in 1606, in favour of Lord Fleming of Bygar and Cumbernauld. He was the representative of a younger branch, in which the title continued till it became extinct, in 1747, at the death of John, sixth earl.* Boghall Castle, once the seat of the above powerful family, is now reduced to the relics of three towers, which stand detached in a cultivated field on the south side of the town of Biggar. The Plan (Fig. 253) shows * The Upper Ward of Lanarkshire. By J. Vere Irving and Alexander Murray, Vol. i. p. 295. BOCillALL CASTLK — 321 — THIRD PERIOD the relative position of these towers, and the dotted lines show the probable positions of the enclosing walls of the courtyard, with the gateway and mansion-house, so far as these can be gathered from the views by Grose, Clark of Eldon, and Riddel of Glenriddel, made about a century ago. The whole structure was formerly surrounded by marshes and a deep fosse. The gatehouse was situated at a salient angle of the north wall, H (- TOWER AT A ENLARGED Fio. 253.— Boghall Castle. Plan. and, from the old views above referred to, was evidently a substantial structure, having a central archway and guardrooms on each side, the summit being crowned with a corbelled and embrasured parapet, with turrets at the angles. The north-east and north-west angles of the enceinte were protected by substantial round towers. Fig. 254 shows the form of the north-east tower, which is the best preserved. From (the style of the masonry and form of the shot-holes in them, and of the corbelling under the parapet, these towers have evidently been erections of the THIRD PERIOD — 322 — BOGHALL CASTLE Third Period. They are circular externally, with a diameter of about 17 feet, but have contained square apartments internally of about 8 feet in width. These towers were vaulted on the ground floor and also at the top, so as to carry a stone roof. This is a style of tower which was not uncommon in the above period. The whole enclosure extends to 192 feet from east to west by 205 feet from north to south. There was a circular tower at the south-east angle, but there does not appear to have been any FIG. 254.— Boghall Castle. North-East Tower. tower at the south-west angle. The curtain walls were provided with shot-holes, widely splayed, like those of the towers. The mansion-house stood at the south-east angle of the courtyard. It consisted of a plain oblong structure of the T form. The tower, still existing, contained the entrance door and staircase in the centre of the mansion-house. Its existing condition is seen in Fig. 255. A moulding at the eaves contains the date 1670, which is probably original. Beneath this are the windows which lighted the staircase, and between them a BOGIIALL CASTLE — 323 — THIRD PERIOD panel containing the arms and supporters of the Earls of Wigton. The roof, although ruinous, is only about a hundred years old. The original roof (as shown in the drawings above referred to, as well as in Fig. 256, which is taken from a drawing in the library of the Royal Scottish Academy) was a lofty conical one. The mansion-house has, from its style, been evidently a structure of the Fourth Period, probably as late as the above date of 1670. HVX^v Fro. 255.— Bodiall C.astle. Staircase Tower. The enceinte, with its towers and gatehouse, have undoubtedly pre- sented a large and important example of the Courtyard Plan of the Third Period. It is unfortunate that so few of its features have been preserved. The fate common to so many of our ancient edifices has overtaken it, the stones having been nearly all carted away within the present century to form materials for the building of dykes and farm offices. THIRD PEUIOD — 324 — BOGHALL CASTLE 1NNEBWICK CASTLE — 325 — THIRD PERIOD INNERWICK CASTLE, HADDINGTONSHIRE. This once extensive building, now reduced to a state of ruin, occupied the whole platform of a detached point of red sandstone rock, which pro- jects into the deep and rocky ravine of the Thornton Burn, about a mile and a half from its junction with the sea, and five miles south-east from Dunbar. This mass of sandstone is perpendicular for a considerable ft*. .— Uraii; G'atlie Tower. Details. Craig Came, or Kellechaffe, as it was anciently called, was granted by Robert the Bruce to John, son of Neil, Earl of Carrick, and from him the Neilsons who built the castle claimed their descent. In a panel in the north front above the doorway are the Neilson arms, cheveron, argent, and or ; in chief two sinister bands couped, and erect gules, and in base a dagger point downwards. Over this are the initials I. N. (probably John Neilson). On another shield in the same panel are the arms of his wife, with the initial M., and over all these has been an inscription, probably the motto of the family " Hie Regi." HILLS CASTLE, KIRKCUDBRIGHTSHIRE. Situated about eight miles west from Dumfries, this house stands in a high and lonely situation, and now forms a portion of a farm-steading. HILLS CASTLE 391 FOURTH PERIOD The latter occupies part of the site of ancient buildings on the north side of the courtyard. The castle (Fig. 307) consists of a keep in the south- west corner, with a range of later buildings joined to it on the east. The courtyard is enclosed on the west side with a high wall, having a striking and picturesque entrance gateway in the centre (Fig. 308), 6 feet 5 inches wide, with a small chamber above it, measuring about 8 feet 8 inches long by 4 feet 3 inches wide. This chamber seems to have been reached by a stair from the courtyard, and has its entrance door at the north end. GATE . ;WAV Fio. 307.— Hills Castle. Plan. The keep measures about 29 feet 10 inches from east to west by about 23 feet 6 inches from north to south, and 45 feet from the ground to the top of the parapet. The entrance is from the courtyard at the north-east angle of the tower, and leads directly to the vaulted ground floor through a lobby formed by the projection inwards at the north-east corner of the wheel-staircase which goes up to the parapet walk. There are three stories above the vault, with an attic, and a fireplace occurs in each story, with garde-robes on the first and second. The gargoyles along the parapet are peculiar and are all alike, being formed of two stones with circular bands round them in imitation of cannons (Fig. 309). The later addition adjoining is a plain building with a communication to the keep on the FOURTH PERIOD 392 HILLS CASTLE first floor. The former is much more ruinous than the latter, which is in a fair state of preservation. The writer of the history of Lands and their Owners supposes this PIG. 308. — Hills Castle. View from North-West. castle to have been built in the reign of Robert in. This opinion neither an architect nor an antiquarian could endorse, for it is not supported either by the style of the structure or by record. But there does not ISLE TOWER — 393 — FOURTH PEKIOD Fio. 309.— Hills Castle. Gargoyle. require to be any speculation on the subject, as we learn from the same history that in 1527 James Douglas of Drumlanrig resigned his lands of Hills into the king's hands, for a new charter in favour of Edward Maxwell in Breconside. This charter was granted in the following year, and the present tower was no doubt erected soon thereafter. This is evident from the arms over the entrance doorway (Fig. 310). Those in the upper panel are worn away, but are recognisable as the Maxwell arms from the crest of the stag rising from a holly bush. In the compartment beneath are the Maxwell arms, together with the arms of the Carsons (three crescents), and the ,^.^~ ,- p,yi r initials of Edward Maxwell and Janet Carson, \ f"'-n_l»-~ his wife. Maxwell died before 1566, so that \*—~ «~'^S*f,'iff^$ the date of the erection of Hills is narrowed to the thirty-eight years before his death, or between 1528 and 1566. Several other stones containing arms are to be seen about the buildings, one of which exhibits the arms and initials of Edward Maxwell and his wife Agnes Maxwell. This proprietor succeeded in 1593, and was alive in 1643. He doubt- less erected some of the buildings. Over the gateway are the arms shown on Fig. 311. The date of 1721 is also observable, and probably indicates the time when the existing wing was added. Plates of all the arms at Hills are to be found in the privately printed volume on the Maxwells by Sir William Fraser. FIG. 311.— Hills Castle. Arms. ISLE TOWER, DUMFRIESSHIRE. This simple but picturesque tower (Fig. 312) is situated about five miles north-west from Dumfries. It stands on the bank of the Nith, which it is supposed at one time surrounded the tower, from which circumstance it derives its name. The edifice is quite entire, and being incorporated with a larger modern house, is still inhabited by the proprietor, J. G. Fergusson, Esq. It is of very small dimensions, measuring over the walls about 23 feet by 20 feet. FIG. 310.— Hills Castle. Maxwell Arms. FOURTH PERIOD 394 — POURMERKLAND TOWKR The entrance is on the east side, and is defended by a strong iron yett having a wooden door in front, and the usual bar-hole in the masonry. The arrangements connected with these are complicated, and are minutely described by Dr. Christison in his paper on Iron Yetts.* FIG. 312. -Isle Tower. Over the doorway are the Fergusson arms (see Sketch, Fig. 312), with the initials of John Fergusson (who succeeded to Isle in 1580), and those of his wife, B. R., and the date of the erection of the tower, 1587. Adjoining Isle is the farm of Ellisland, occupied for a few years by the poet Burns, who, it appears, had his residence for a period in the tower. FOURMERKLAND TOWER. f Situated in the parish of Holywood, Dumfriesshire, about five miles north-west from the county town. It is a simple oblong structure (Fig. 313) about 23 feet 6 inches by 19 feet, and about 30 feet in height to the eaves and 44 feet to the ridge. The tower contains four stories, and the * Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, Vol. v. New Series, 1882-3. t We are indebted for the drawings of this castle to Mr. W. F. Lyon. FOURMERKLAND TOWER — 395 — FOURTH PERIOD arrangement of the apartments is extremely simple. A wheel-stair in one corner adjoining the entrance doorway runs from top to bottom, giving access to the single room which occupies each floor. There are no battle- ments (Fig. 314), but simple eaves and gables, the roof spanning from wall to wall. Two round angle turrets, at diagonally opposite corners, serve to give a castellated air to the simple tower. The ground floor is vaulted, and feebly lighted by three small loops. Over the doorway, in a panel, are the Maxwell arms (a saltier, with a holly leaf in chief, a mullet or star on dexter side, and stag's head on base), with the date above 1590, GROUND FLOOR SECOND FLOOR Fio. 313.— Fourmcrklaud Tower. Plans and Section. on either side of which occur the initials of Robert Maxwell, while I. C. at the bottom of the panel are those of his wife. Above the panel, and communicating with the staircase on the first floor, there projects a stone drain, supposed by Mr. Lyon to be connected with the defence of the tower. That it served such a purpose is likely enough, seeing that the doorway is immediately beneath. A similar stone drain projects over the doorway in the north curtain of Craigmillar Castle, where, however, its interior connection and arrangement is now lost. The large window on the first floor is modern, as is also the dormer window at the roof, and the upper courses of the masonry of the turrets. FOURTH PERIOD — 396 — LAG TOWER The curious oblong windows in the gables, formed like shot-holes, and opening into the roof, are uncommon and remarkable features. This is FIG. 314.— Fourmerkland Tower. an admirable and almost unaltered example of the simple keeps of the Fourth Period. LAG TOWER, DUMFRIESSHIRE. This keep stands about three miles from Auld Garth Bridge, the road winding round green pasture hills. It is situated on a knoll in the midst of a wilderness of rank vegetation and ruins, adjacent to a farm-steading. The building (Fig. 315), of which the walls remain to a considerable height, measures 29 feet 9 inches from north to south, by 25 feet 3 inches from east to west. The door is in the middle of the LAG TOWER — 397 — FOURTH PERIOD south end, and led directly by a passage through a wall 5 feet 9 inches thick into the basement floor, which consists of an apartment 17 feet 11 inches long by 13 feet 6 inches wide. The upper floors, of which there were three, contained each one room of the same dimensions. From a passage in the north-east corner of the tower a wheel -stair 3 feet 3 inches wide led to the upper floors. The entrance seems to have had both an outer door and one which folded into the passage. Another door also opened into the ground floor, and it is probable that the foot of the stair had also a separate door. None of the floors were vaulted. The ground floor is lighted by a small slit 5 inches wide, and has no other opening. The first floor has a fireplace in FIG. 315.— Lag Tower. Plan. the north end, and two side lights with pointed arches. The second floor has a fireplace also in the north end, with a garde-robe alongside, and similar arched windows towards the west. The corbelling for the joists of the third floor remains, but most of the walls above this height are gone. From the north-west corner of the tower a ruined wall runs diagonally down the hill for about 35 feet, and at the foot of the hill, at a distance of about 40 feet north-westwards, there are the remains of ruined outbuildings. Lag belonged from the beginning of the fifteenth century to the family of Grierson, the last occupant of the house being Sir Robert FOURTH PERIOD 398 BONSHAW, ROBGILL, WAKDHOUSE Grierson of Lag, a well-known enemy of the Covenanters, in the latter half of the sixteenth century. EDINGHAM CASTLE, KIRKCUDBRIGHT. A fragment situated a few miles eastwards from Dalbeattie. It has been a small structure, measuring about 28 feet from east to west by 20 feet 2 inches (Fig. 316). The entrance is on the east side, and it leads into a small porch (Fig. 317), from which two doors lead into Pio. 316.— Edinerham Castlo. Plan. Fro. 317.- -Edingham Castle. the vaulted ground floor, which was probably divided into two apart- ments. The stair is in the south-east corner, and leads to the first and second floors. The history of Edingham is apparently not well known, at all events we have not found any reference to it in any of the usual works on Galloway. BONSHAW, ROBGILL, AND WARDHOUSE TOWERS,* DUMFRIESSHIRE. These towers are all situated in the same locality, and within one mile of each other, being in the parish of Annan, and from four to five miles distant from the town of that name. They stand in a singularly beautiful valley, through which runs the Kirtle Water. Of the three towers, only Bonshaw is anything like perfect, the other two having had very rough usage. They have all evidently been built about the same time, and have * We are indebted for Plans of these towers and for the notes regarding them to James D. Roberton, Esq. , Park Terrace East, Glasgow. nONSIIAW, ROBGILL, WARDHOUSE — 399 — FOURTH PERIOD many points of resemblance to each other. They are within a few feet of the same size, the average dimensions being about 34 feet by 25 feet (see Figs. 318, 319, 320). Bonshaw is slightly the largest. Bonshaw and Robgill have each a splayed base, and the entrance doorway and staircase are alike in both. The mode in which Robgill was finished at the top cannot now be positively ascertained, but the other two towers Fio. 318.— Bonshaw Towor. were almost identical in the corbelling and parapet, and both have splayed shot-holes and the same small high window on the ground floor. In each instance the ground floor only is vaulted. BONSHAW (Fig. 318) stands on the top of a high bank on the right side of the Kirtle, which here winds through a deep narrow valley. It FOURTH PERIOD — 400 — BONSHAW, ROBGILL, WARDHOUSE is most picturesquely situated, and stands about 90 feet back from the cliff, with the entrance doorway facing the south. On the edge of the cliff are the remains of old buildings which probably formed part of the courtyard walls. Over the moulded entrance doorway (Fig. 319) is the following inscription : — * FIG. 319. — Bonshaw Tower. Inscriptions. The entrance passage in the thickness of the wall is vaulted, and a pendant from the roof contained the monogram shown in same Fig. The ground floor (Fig. 320) has four large finely splayed shot-holes, one on each of the four sides, and on the west side adjoining the dungeon FIG. 320.— Bonshaw Tower. Plan. there is a small window high up in the vault. The small dungeon measures about 8 feet by 5 feet, and is constructed so as to partly project into the cellar from which it enters — a somewhat peculiar arrange- * We are indebted to Mr. Armstrong for this illustration. BONSHAW, ROBGILL, WARDHOUSE 401 FOURTH PERIOD ment. The height of this floor is 9 feet 8 inches. A good wheel-stair adjoining the doorway leads to the three upper floors and battlements. There is only one room on each floor. On the first floor is the hall, measuring 27 feet by 17 feet 8 inches, and 10 feet 3 inches from the floor to the floor above. It has been well lighted at the upper or fireplace end, where there are four windows. The fireplace is large and handsome ; it projects 2 feet 1 inch from the wall, and is about 7 feet high to the top of its moulded cornice. On the projecting jambs are two holes as shown on the Plan. They are about 6 inches square and occur at about 2 feet from the floor, and were evidently meant for a beam sliding through. Can they have been for a revolving spit ? The ambry in the south wall has an Old Gothic-shaped lintel. A few steps up the staircase from the hall there is a carefully cut stone sink, with a drain to the outside. The second floor has four windows, the east one being placed high up in the wall. This floor contains a small garde-robe and the usual wall press, but no fireplace. The building is in good order and is well cared for, but unfortunately about fifty or sixty years ago the old roof, which was covered with large stone flags, was taken off and the stones used for the floor of a farm-stead- ing. A common slated roof was put on in place of the old. The water is carried from the roofs and battlements by cannon-shaped gargoyles. Bonshaw was built by the Irvings, and is still in the possession of that family. ROBQILL TOWER is situated about three-quarters of a mile down the Kirtle Water from Bonshaw, and has a somewhat similar situation — on the edge of a cliff about 40 feet high. The tower (Fig. 321) remained entire till about ten years ago, when it was wilfully pulled down to the PIG. 321.— Robgill Tower. Plan of Ground Floor. level of the hall floor in order to allow of a dining-room connected with the adjoining modern house being built over the ancient basement floor. The kitchen was on the ground floor, where the fine arched fireplace still survives. The arch is rounded on the edge a'nd projects some inches from the line of the wall. 2 c FOURTH PERIOD 402 — THIRLSTANE CASTLE WAREHOUSE is also situated on the banks of the Kirtle, almost opposite Bobgill, but only on the ground floor (Fig. 322) is the outline of the tower entire. Some years ago the building fell, through neglect and decay, but was immediately re-erected as we see it now. The FIG. 322.— Wardhouse Tower. Plans. staircase is narrower than in the other towers, and is situated in the corner opposite the door. The upper floor windows are about 2 feet square, placed in the centre of arched recesses. Only one side of the hall fireplace remains ; it has been large and good. This tower has been a story higher than its neighbours at Bonshaw and Robgill. THIRLSTANE CASTLE, SELKIRKSHIRE. The ruins of the old tower of the Scotts of Thirlstane stand behind the modern mansion of Lord Napier and Ettrick, the representative of the distinguished family of Scott-Napier. It stands in a remote upland district about seventeen miles south-west of Selkirk. The tower is now greatly ruined, and presents no architectural features. It has been one of the ordinary simple Border peles of the Fourth Period. The lintel of the doorway, which was discovered in the walls of the farm-house, has now been replaced in its original position ; on it are carved the letters ^\~, " the initials of Sir Robert Scott and his first wife, Mary Cranston, indicating a date somewhere between 1590 and 1620 " (Craig Brown). DRYHOPE — 403 — FOURTH PERIOD GAMELSCLEUCH,* SELKIRKSHIRE. A ruined simple keep, about two miles from Ettrick, built towards the end of the sixteenth century by Symon Scott, called "Simon of the FIG. 323.— Gamelscleuch. Plan. Spear." It is now reduced to walls little more than one story high (Fig. 323). DRYHOPE,! SELKIRKSHIRE. A tower of one of the branches of the Scotts. It stands near the lower end of St. Mary's Loch. In 1592 Scott of Goldielands was com- missioned to demolish it, owing to the owner having been " art and part in the late treasonable attempt against the king at Falkland." The tower, however, still stands, though dismantled and ruinous. It is a Fio. 324. — Dryhope, Plan. simple keep (Fig. 324), measuring 33 feet by 22 feet, with walls about 4 feet thick. It was four stories in height (Fig. 325), and the disposition of the apartments was the ordinary one. All architectural features have now vanished, and even the corner stones are to a great extent removed. Dryhope is celebrated in song as the home of the " Flower of Yarrow." Mr. Craig Brown mentions that " built in the wall of the new onstead is * The Sketch is by Mr. W. Anderson. t Idem. FOURTH PERIOD — 404 BLACKHOUSE CASTLE FIG. 325.— Dryhope. View from North-East. an elegantly sculptured tablet from the old tower, bearing the initials P. S. ' M. S., for Philip and Mary Scott, parents of the ' Flower of Yarrow.' " BLACKHOUSE CASTLE,* SELKIRKSHIRE. A ruinous tower on the left bank of the Douglas Burn, two and a half miles from the north-east end of St. Mary's Loch. It has been a simple Fio. 326.— Blackhousc Castle. * The Sketch is by Mr. W. Anderson. KIRKHOPE TOWER - 405 - FOURTH PERIOD oblong pele with a round tower at one angle adjoining the door and containing the staircase. It is supposed to be an old home of the Douglases, and the scene of the Douglas tragedy. The walls are now reduced to one story in height (Fig. 326), but the form of the plan bears evidence of its being probably a Fourth Period structure. KIRKHOPE TOWER, SELKIRKSHIRE. " This lonely Border tower is situated about seven miles west from Selkirk, on a green hillside overlooking the vale of Ettrick. It stands on very rough uneven ground, sloping southwards from the entrance front down to the valley, while behind the tower the hills rise suddenly and steeply. On the east a deep ravine containing a brawling stream cuts off the tower from easy access on that side. The building is in a fair state of preservation, having evidently been inhabited till within recent years, but it is now getting into a state of decay. It is of small size, but like all these old towers it has a solid and imposing appearance. The struc- ture (Fig. 327) is nearly square, its external measurements being 27 feet 4 inches from east to west by 22 feet 8 inches from north to south, and it is four stories high, with an attic (Figs. 327 and 328). The ground floor is vaulted, and being provided with only one small zig-zag slit, it is almost dark. The entrance door to the ground floor is on the south side, and from the ingoing of the door a straight stair leads to the first floor. Immediately over this doorway, now built up, was the principal entrance, which was placed on the first floor, in order that, in case of danger or in the absence of the head of the house, the lower door could be permanently secured, and access gained by a short ladder to the upper door. The stair to the upper floors is in the corner, necessi- tating, as frequently happens, that the principal room had to be traversed before reaching it. This stair was of timber, and is now completely decayed. There are no windows in either the east or west ends, except small ones between 30 and 40 feet above the ground, and on the north side there are only the small slit on the ground floor, and a staircase " bole " at a con- siderable height above the ground. Security against a Border raid has thus evidently been a main object in designing the structure, and more than once has this little tower resisted attacks with both fire and sword. The arrangements of the battlements are of a late type, being provided with roofed-in shelters for the sentries instead of the usual corbelled angle turrets. The corbels supporting the parapet are of the rudest kind, being merely square undressed blocks. The masonry, likewise, is composed in a great measure of stones such as are found lying on the slopes around. There has been a barmkin in front, not seemingly in immediate con- nection with the tower, but entirely commanded and overlooked by it. It is situated about 30 yards to the south, and measures some 30 yards FOURTH PERIOD — 406 KIRKHOPE TOWER from east to west by 15 yards from north to south. This was evidently a place of security for cattle. The walls were of considerable thickness, but are now a mass of ruins. There is no evidence of the date of the erection of Kirkhope, but it FIRST FLOOR GROUND FLOOR PIG. 327. — Kirkhope Tower. Plans of Ground Floor and First Floor, and View from South- West. was doubtless built after the year 1535, when an Act of Parliament on the building of Border peles and barmkins was framed. The Act requires that the proprietor " sail big ane sufficient barmkyn upon his heritage and landis, of stane and lyme, contenand thre score futis of the square, ane KIRKIIOPE TOWER — 407 — FOURTH PERIOD eln thick, and six elnes heicht for the resett and defense of him, his tennents, and his gudis in troublous tyme, with ane toure in the samen for himself gif he thinks it expedient. And all ather landit men of smaller rent and reuenew big pelis and greit strenthis as they plese for saifing of thamselfs, &c. ; and that all the saidis strenthis, barmkynis, and pelis .be biggit and completit within twa yeris under pane." But, as observed in connection with Sniailholrn Tower,* it is doubtful if this Fio. 32S.— Kirkhope Tower. View from North-East. Act was ever passed. The style of the work clearly belongs to the Fourth Period. During the terrible devastation of the Borders in 1543 the gates of Kirkhope were burned, and the cattle and sheep driven off. Mr. Craig Brown, in his History of Selkirkshire (p. 353), mentions that "previous to its acquisition in the beginning of last century by the Duchess of Buccleuch (Mou mouth's widow), Kirkhope belonged to the Scotts of Harden, one of the wealthiest families on the Scottish border. The tower itself was frequently occupied by the laird's eldest son, and there is reason to believe * Vol. i. p. 137. FOURTH PERIOD — 408 — OAKWOOD TOWER that ' Auld Wat ' himself, while he was yet ' Young Wat,' lived here when he wooed and won the 'Flower of Yarrow.'" Of this redoubtable hero and the beautiful Mary Scott of Dryhope Tower, Border ballads and songs are full. Their marriage took place in 1576, and in a note to the ballad of "Jamie Telfer," Sir Walter Scott says that the marriage contract still exists " in the charter-room of Mr. Scott of Harden." OAKWOOD TOWER,* SELKIRKSHIRE. A keep situated about three or four miles south-west from Selkirk, on the edge of a steep bank sloping down to the valley of the Ettrick, not FIG. 329. — Oakwood Tower. Plans, Section, and North Elevation. * We are indebted for the Second and Third Floor Plans, the Section, and measured Elevation of this tower to Mr. William Anderson. OAK WOOD TOWEK — 409 — FOURTH PERIOD far from the meeting of Ettrick and Yarrow, and within a few miles of royal Newark and the lonely Tower of Kirkhope, and in the very centre of the Border country made famous by Sir Walter Scott and the Ettrick Shepherd. Oakwood Tower is in a good state of preservation, although it has been considerably altered and repaired. It now forms a portion of a farm-steading, the upper floors being used as a granary, and a wide opening for backing carts into, for the purpose of loading and unloading grain, has been cut out of the east end. The tower is oblong on Plan (Fig. 329), measuring about 38 feet from east to west by about 23 feet 6 inches from north to south, and about 49 feet in height to the ridge of the roof. It contains a vaulted ground floor, with two stories and attics above. The entrance doorway (Figs. 330 and 331), situated near the centre FIG. 330.— Oakwood Tower. Entrance Doorway. of the north side, is round-headed, with a bold flowing moulding. An inner door opens from the entrance passage into the ground floor, and from this passage a wheel-staircase in the north-west angle leads to the various upper floors. A peculiarity of this staircase is the width of the newel, which measures from 2 to 3 feet in diameter, and is built with small stones and mortar. The small chamber on the ground floor adjoining the staircase has now no entrance from the interior. It may have entered formerly either from under the stair or by a trap from the floor above. The door shown to the outside is modern. The hall, on the first floor, is about 19 feet 6 inches long by 16 feet wide. It contains a very fine fireplace in the north wall (Fig. 332). The opening measures 7 feet 2 inches wide by 5 feet to top of arch, which is composed of three stones jointed in the method shown. Some masons' marks are conspicuous on FOURTH PERIOD — 410 — OAKWOOD TOWER these stones. The roof is entirely modern, and so are the intermediate wooden floors. The square turrets at the diagonally opposite corners (Fig. 333) are supported on ornamental corbels, that at the north-west angle being enriched with nail-head, dog-tooth, and billet enrichments, Fie. 331. — Oakwood Tower. View from North-East. while in that at the south-east angle the arrangement of the same ornaments is reversed (Fig. 334). This style of enrichment was common all over Scotland during the seventeenth century. The square and enriched turrets, without any parapet, are indicative of a late date. OAKWOOD TOWER — 411 — FOURTH PEUIOU At Oakwood all the dressed and moulded work, corners, and crow- steps are of carefully hewn sandstone, and the general walling is of rubble. From Mr. Craig Brown's work on Selkirkshire we find that Oakwood was from the beginning of the sixteenth century in the possession of a family of the name of Scott. In 1541 a royal charter was granted to William Scott for Oakwood and South Bowhill, in the neighbourhood, "with the condition of erecting a house and policy," and supplying armed horsemen to serve in the king's wars. The tower does not seem to have been built till about sixty years after this, as there occurs over FIG. 332.— Oakwood Tower. Fireplace in Hall. one of the windows on the second floor of the south front a carved stone (Fig. 335) with the initials R. S. (Robert Scott) and L. M. — probably those of his wife, and believed to be a daughter of the house of Murray — with the date "Ano 1602." It is doubtful whether this stone was originally intended for its present position. It seems to be wrought for the key- stone of a moulded arch, and has been placed where it now is without any special fitness for its position. It can, therefore, scarcely be regarded as determining the date of the castle ; but if brought from an older build- ing, it would indicate that the tower is of a later date than/ that on the stone, a view which would coincide with the style of the structure. The FOURTH PERIOD — 412 — OAKWOOD TOWER tympanum of the dormer above the carved stone just referred to contains three fleurs-de-lys (Fig. 336), while the lintel of one of the windows of the FIG. 333.— Oak wood Tower. View from South-West. east elevation and some of the chimney -heads are carved with dog- tooth ornaments (see Fig. 333). GOLDIELANDS TOWER 413 FOURTH PERIOD Fio. 334.— Oakwood Tower North-West Angle Turret. Fio. 336.— Oakwood Tower. Dormer. GOLDIELANDS TOWER, ROXBURGHSHIRE. A simple oblong tower, standing on a height above the right bank of the Teviot, about two miles south from Hawick. It faces the valley of the Borthwick Water, and commands the access to it. The tower (Fig. Fio. 337. -Goldielands Tower. Plan of First Floor. 337) measures 34 feet by 24 feet, with walls above 4 feet in thickness. The entrance doorway is on the ground level, and the turnpike staircase adjoins it, and the partition enclosing it juts out into the interior. The ground floor contains the usual vaulted cellar, and on the first floor is FOURTH PERIOD — 414 — BARNS TOWER the hall, 19 feet 6 inches by 15 feet, with a small room in the recess formed by the projection of the staircase. The elevations present no features of interest, the parapet being gono. Goldielands was the residence of one of the offshoots from the Scotts of Branxholm towards the end of the sixteenth century, and is frequently mentioned in Border song. The building is probably of about the above date. BARNS TOWER, PKEBLESSHIRE. A well-preserved tower situated close to the south bank of the Tweed, about two and a half miles above Peebles. It forms a rectangular keep TH I RD FLOOR FOURTH FLOOR LINTEL OVER FIRST FLOOR WINDOW GROUND FLOOR lliillli'il SECTION FIG. 338. — Barns Tower. Plans, Section, &c. BARNS TOWER — 415 — FOURTH PERIOD (Fig. 338), 28 feet by 20 feet, and is three stories in height, with an attic. The ground floor is vaulted. The building has been considerably altered, and the roof and floors are modern. The entrance doorway (Fig. 339) on the ground floor still retains its grated iron yett, which Dr. Christison regards as probably the oldest in Scotland. The tower was originally on a level site, but the ground around it has been excavated, so that it now stands on an isolated knoll. There used to be a tripod beacon light lying in the attic, which has now found a place in the museum at Peebles. Opposite the entrance door another door leads into the vaulted basement, and a stair in the thickness of the north-west wall conducts to the hall on the first floor, which is 17 feet 6 inches by 14 feet. The stair from the first to the second floor has been entirely altered, the FIG. 339.— Barns Tower. View from South-West. remains of the old stair being still visible. There was probably a garde-robe where the present stair now is, as there is an opening or shoot in the outer wall just below that point. The upper part of the tower is entirely altered, a modern roof with gables being substituted for the original parapet. The chimney on the west gable is a false one, as there are no fireplaces in that wall. The building is rough cast, and much overgrown with ivy. This tower belonged in the end of the sixteenth century to the repre- sentative of the ancient family of the Burnets of Burnetland, who estab- lished themselves in the Manor district in the fourteenth century. On the lintel of the window above the doorway are carved the initials W. B. and M. S. (see Fig. 338) for William Burnet and his wife, Margaret Stewart of FOURTH PERIOD — 416 — CTASTLEHILL Traquair. This laird, who was well known by the nickname of "Howlet," "was renowned (1591) for his sagacity in conducting midnight expedi- tions."* He was also a staunch cavalier, and appeared at the Weapon Show of 1627 "well horsed, with a buff-coat and steel bonnet, lance and sword, accompanied with seven horsemen."! The date 1498 is cut in the lintel of the entrance door, but this inscription appears to be of comparatively modern origin. CASTLEHILL, PEEBLESSHIRE. A ruin (Fig. 340) situated about two and a half miles up the valley of the Manor, a southern tributary of the Tweed, and about four and a half miles from Peebles. This was probably a seat of the Burnets of Barns; at least it belonged to them from 1716 to 1760. The tower, which has been a rectangular block 37 feet 6 inches by 39 feet 6 inches (Fig. 341), stands on a rocky knoll between the public road and the river. It is a much stronger building than Barns, the walls being about 7 feet thick. There are two vaulted cellars on the FIG. 340.— Castlehill. ground level with the rock for their floor. The entrance is on the side next the river, and has had an iron yett and stair in the thickness of the wall very similar to those of Barns. Of the first floor there only remains the west and part of the south wall. This floor has also been vaulted, and contains the remains of a wheel-stair at the north-west corner (see Fig. 341). There is an arched recess in the wall in the basement under this stair, and a similar recess occurs at Barns in the same position. A new iron yett has recently been put on in imitation of that at Barns, * Chambers's Peeblesshire, p. 400. t Ibid. p. 400. POSSO CASTLE — 417 — FOURTH PERIOD GROUND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN Fio. 341.— Castlehill. Plans of Ground Floor and First Floor. and the top of the vault and some of the walls have been covered with cement for preservation. POSSO CASTLE, PEEBLESSHIRE. The ancient seat of the Bairds, who were succeeded in the sixteenth century by the Naesmyths. It is now a ruin, situated about four miles up the Manor valley, and six miles from Peebles. A few fragments of walls are all that remain. 2D FOURTH PERIOD — 418 — NETHER HORSBURGH CASTLE It seems to have been an L-shaped courtyard 7G feet by 68 feet, with a small keep at the northern end 30 feet 6 inches by 24 feet 6 inches, the walls of which were 4 feet 3 inches thick. WRAE CASTLE. A tower situated on the western side of the Tweed, about ten miles above Peebles, and now consists of only a fragment of considerable height of one angle of the building. It belonged to a branch of the Tweedies. HORS BURGH CASTLE, PEEBLESSHIRE. The seat of the Horsburghs, who were for generations sheriff-deputes of Peeblesshire, and are considered the oldest territorial family in the country.* The ruins of the castle are situated on a remarkably prominent knoll two miles below Peebles, from which it overlooks the Tweed, and com- mands a view of Peebles, and Neidpath in the distance. It forms a prominent object in the landscape, but on closer examination consists of only a few fragments of walls about 4 feet thick, with traces of stairs at two places. Some years ago the walls, which are of whinstone, were patched up in a rather injudicious manner. NETHER HORSBURGH CASTLE, PEEBLESSHIRE. Another ruin erected by the same family as the preceding! (Fig. 342). Situated beside a mountain stream which flows into the Tweed about three Fio. 342. — Nether Horsburgh Castle. View. * Chambers's Peeblesshire, p. 128. t Ibid. p. 374. HIRKNDEAN CASTLE — 419 — FOURTH PERIOD miles below Peebles, and on its northern side. It is a rectangular keep 32 feet by 26 feet, with walls 4 feet 3 inches thick, but is in a state of complete ruin. The basement has been vaulted, and the door seems to have been on the northern side. Some of the walls are three stories high, but are very fragmentary. There are traces of a stair at the north-east corner, but the east wall is entirely gone. The structure is all built with whinstone. HUTCHEONFIELD TOWER, PEEBLESSHIRE. The ruins of a small vaulted tower on the hill face overlooking Eddlestone Water, about three quarters of a mile north from Peebles. Nothing now remains but a vault. HIRENDEAN CASTLE, MIDLOTHIAN. This castle stands about five miles south from Temple. It has a lonely situation (Fig. 343) at the base of the Moorfoot Hills, which tower behind the castle in picturesque groups ranging in height from about 1700 to 2000 feet. Fio. 343.— Hirendean Castle. View from North. As will be seen from the Sketch very little of the castle remains — merely a corner — and no description of it can be given further than that it has been a small keep, the foundations of which are probably buried beneath the green-covered mounds seen in the View. While thus the FOURTH PERIOD — 420 — MINTO TOWER outward aspect of the castle has almost entirely disappeared, its history has likewise vanished. In answer to a question on this subject in the Scotsman of 13th August 1889, it was stated that the lands of Moorfoot, or Morthuweit, on which Hirendean stands, " were granted by David I. to the Abbey of Newbattle about the middle of the twelfth century. The deed of gift is contained in a charter, which is to be found in the Book of Newbattle (Bannatyne Club Publications)." At the Reformation these lands, along with the other valuable properties belonging to the Abbey, fell into the possession of Mark Ker, and it is supposed that the castle was built by one of his family. MINTO TOWER,* OR FAT LIPS TOWER, ROXBURGHSHIRE. This tower stands on a rujjced situation on the summit of the well- known Minto Craigs. PIG. 344. — Miiito Tower. East and North Elevations. The upper part of the building above the corbelling (Fig. 344) has lately been restored, but all beneath is old. As it now stands it presents a favourable specimen of a Border keep, having the usual * For the drawings of this keep we are indebted to Mr. William Anderson, architect, Galashiels. TIMPENDEAN CASTLE _ 421 — FOURTH PERIOD vaulted ground floor (Fig. 345), comprising a lower story, with an upper loft in the vault, and three stories above, the floors of which are of timber supported on stone corbels, the whole being served with a narrow wheel- stair in the south-east corner, which commences on the ground level just inside the doorway. FIG. 345.— Minto Tower. Plans and Section. The building measures over the walls 32 feet 6 inches by 26 feet 9 inches, and contains one room only on each floor, and has no mural closets. The three upper floors contain each a fireplace. They are well lighted, the first floor having a look-out all round from windows provided with stone seats. Fat Lips is supposed to have been a keep of the Turnbulls. TIMPENDEAN CASTLE, ROXBURGHSHIRE. A simple tower, which stands on rising ground between the valley of the Teviot and that of the Jed, about three miles north-west of FOURTH PERIOD — 422 — TIMPENDEAN CASTLE Jedburgh. From a curve cut out of the south-west angle of the walls (Fig. 346) it would appear that additions were at one time made or contemplated on the west side of the tower, and some " tusks " or bond stones projecting westwards from the north and south walls (Fig. 347) seem to point to the same conclusion. But these additions, if they ever existed, have been completely removed and the old tower again stands alone, and almost in its original form, except where ruined. The entrance door in the east wall, and probably the fireplace in the basement, were, how- ever, alterations made at the time of the proposed additions. The tower is 29 feet from east to west, by 24 feet from north to south, and has walls about 4 feet in thickness. The original entrance doorway is in the north side. It is a plain circular-headed opening with outer rebate for an iron yett, and inner rebate for a wooden door. The entrance to the cellar in the basement, which is vaulted, is opposite the entrance door, and the entrance passage gives access on the left to the circular staircase in the FIRST FLOOR GROUND FLOOR FIG. 346.— Timpendean Castle. Plans of Ground Floor and First Floor. north-east angle. The walls of the basement are pierced with shot- holes. The first floor contained the hall (17 feet by 16 feet 3 inches) and a small apartment or recess, 9 feet by 5 feet 4 inches at the east side. The fireplace is 8 feet 6 inches wide. The hall has been lighted by windows in the north and south walls. A stone sink is inserted in the wall of the staircase nearly on the level of the hall floor. There have been two floors above the hall, but they are now greatly destroyed, the side walls being almost entirely broken away. A small stream flows past the south side, and, in a slight ravine, CORBKTT CASTLE — 423 — FOURTH PERIOD along the east side of the tower. Artificial ditches are still traceable along the south and west sides, as many as three successive mounds and hollows being observable to the west. The ground rises to the south, and there the ditch seems to have been dammed up and filled with water. How far these ditches have been intended for defence, or whether they FIG. 347.— Timpendean C'astle. View from North-Weot. have formed part of a Dutch garden connected with the enlarged mansion, it is difficult to determine. They are much better preserved than earth- works of that kind generally are. Timpendean formed part of the territory of Bonjed worth, and remained in the family of Douglas from 1497 till the present century.* CORBETT CASTLE, ROXBURGHSHIRE. A small tower (Fig. 348) standing on the top of the steep bank which bounds the valley of the Kale Water, about one mile south from Morebattle. The tower (Fig. 349) measures only 22 feet 2 inches by 16 feet 4 inches externally. It has contained a single small apartment on each floor, but the * Jeffrey's Roxburghshire, Vol. 11. p. 374. FOURTH PERIOD — 424 — COKBETT CASTLE building having been partly reconstructed and modernised internally, the original arrangements cannot now be determined. The entrance doorway, which is original, is on the ground floor. It contains a rebate on the outside for the iron yett, as well as one on the inside for the wooden door. - The lintel of this doorway (Fig. 350) is remarkable from its containing the sacred monogram I. H. S., together with the initials of the founder and FIG. 348. - Corbett Castle. View from South-West. those of his wife, with the date. This property, like the adjoining Gateshaw, may possibly have been of old a possession of the Abbey of Melrose, which connection may be intended to be marked in this way. Corbett doubtless belonged at an early date to a proprietor of the same name, "one of the oldest surnames in Scotland."* It afterwards passed into the hands of the Kers, and from the initials on the lintel the present * Jeffrey's Roxburghshire,, Vol. n. p. 307- \ COWDENKNOWES — 425 — FOURTH PERIOD structure was evidently built by one of that family. The walls are well pierced with shot-holes for defence. The upper part of the tower FIG. 349. — Corbett Castle. Plan. has been reconstructed and the parapet removed, so that the Sketch gives but an imperfect representation of its original appearance. FIG. 350.— Corbett Castle. Monogram,